Archives

Is Sinn Féin Really Fit For Government?

A Growing Catalogue of Arrests, Resignations, Expelling’s and Charges Raises Questions.

As Sinn Féin positions itself as a “Government-in-waiting”, the party continues to face uncomfortable scrutiny over the number of members, former members and associates who have been arrested or charged with serious offences in recent years.

An examination of publicly reported cases between 2015 and 2025 reveals a significant series of criminal investigations involving individuals linked to the party; ranging from sexual offences and child exploitation to violent crime, coercive control, fraud, and high-profile gangland-related charges. While the party has consistently stressed that individuals facing prosecution are immediately suspended and that Sinn Féin “does not tolerate criminality,” the accumulation of cases has prompted renewed debate about whether the organisation is adequately equipped to manage governance at national level.

A Decade of Difficult Headlines.
Among the most serious cases is that of Mr Jonathan Dowdall, the former Dublin City councillor who was arrested and later charged in connection with the Regency Hotel investigation. Dowdall ultimately pleaded guilty to facilitating the murder of Mr David Byrne and received a four-year prison sentence before entering the Witness Protection Programme.

Also significant is the conviction of Mr Michael McMonagle, a former Sinn Féin member in Derry, who pleaded guilty to multiple counts of sexual assault against minors. He was sentenced to prison and later returned to court for breaching court-imposed restrictions.

Then there was Mr Niall Ó Donnghaile a Senator and former Sinn Féin Seanad leader who was suspended (reported Sept 2023) and resigned from the Seanad in December 2023.
Referred internally to PSNI/Social Services after it emerged, he had sent “inappropriate” messages to a 17-year-old; party says there were no criminal findings, but the matter led to his suspension and later resignation.

Mr Barry McElduff, a Former Sinn Féin MP (West Tyrone) was suspended in January 2018 and then resigned as MP shortly afterwards. The reason was he posted a video widely seen as mocking the Kingsmill massacre, (Whitecross massacre) which saw the shooting dead of 10 workmen, which caused major public outrage; suspension was a party sanction (the incident was not a sexual/criminal charge but was a conduct controversy that led to suspension/resignation).

In Belfast, Mr Cathal McLaughlin, a councillor at the time of his suspension from the party, was charged and later convicted of sexual assault, receiving a suspended sentence. His appeal was dismissed.

In recent days a female, a party member in Co Laois, was expelled from Sinn Féin after her home was searched by an Garda Síochána and her partner was arrested in connection with a terrorism-related investigation. The probe relates to an alleged far-right extremist group plotting an attack on a mosque in Galway, linked to explosives found in Co Laois and Co Down.
Sinn Féin’s statement says the member failed to inform the party that her home had been raided, or to alert the party to the seriousness of the situation. That failure was cited as the reason for expulsion. Her partner, a man in his 30s, remains detained under Section 30 of the Offences Against the State Act. He is not named in initial press reports.
The fact that a raid occurred on the house of a party member linked through a partner to an extremist investigation, touches on issues of vetting, disclosure and risk management within the party structure.

The full facts are not yet publicly available. However, we understand that the suspect in this far-right extremism probe met Mrs Mary Lou McDonald campaigning during the general election and urged people to vote for the party last year, declaring: “Let’s bring our country back.” While not known as a party member he was in attendance at a party event in Dublin some six weeks ago.
Sinn Féin have confirmed that the woman and her partner, who is being held in a Midlands Garda Station, were signed into Leinster House twice.
We ask the question, “Is Sinn Féin now expelling members for terrorist activities, God knows in the past they were welcomed?”

Why have so many Councillors Jumped Ship in the past decade?

Name.Council/AreaWhen leftReported Reason/ Context
June Murphy.Cork (Fermoy).Sept 2015.Resigned citing “an increasingly negative experience” amid local bullying/discipline disputes.
Kieran McCarthy.Cork County Council.June 2015 (expelled).Expelled after an internal review into constituency structures (financial/disciplinary disputes).
Melissa Mullane. Cork.2015 Suspended (12 months).Following the Cork East internal review; part of the same row that saw other departures.
Ger Keohane.Cork County Council.Nov 2015.Resigned from Sinn Féin (reported as a defection) part of multiple Cork departures in 2015.
Noeleen Reilly.Dublin City Council (Ballymun-Finglas).Feb 2018.Resigned citing an “orchestrated bullying campaign”; previously suspended by the party.
Lisa Marie Sheehy.East Cork.Sept 2017.Resigned citing intimidation / being “plotted against” (connected to the Cork East disputes).
Sorcha O’Neill.Sorcha O’Neill Kildare (former Sinn Féin councillor).Apr 2017.Resigned citing “bullying, hostility and aggression” within the local organisation.
Gabe Cronnelly.Galway County Council.May 2020.Resigned from Sinn Féin and sat as an Independent; cited lack of local/national support.
Paul Hayes.Cork County Council May 2020.May 2020.Resigned from Sinn Féin and sat as an Independent; cited lack of local/national support.
Danielle Twomey.Cork County Council (East Cork).Dec 2023.Resigned citing relentless online harassment and internal party “backhanded moves”; now Independent.
Aidan Mullins.Laois County Council.Aug 2024.Resigned after being told he would be suspended for three months; said he was being “silenced” on migration and related issues.
Caroline Dwane-Stanley.Laois County Council.Dec 2024.Resigned saying the party was “not a safe place”; cited the party’s handling of a controversy affecting her family.
Ursula Gavan.Limerick City & County Council.Jan 2025.Resigned citing “family loyalty” after her husband, Senator Paul Gavan, was left off the party’s Seanad selection.

So we ask “Pattern or Misfortune?
Sinn Féin would argues that such incidents are comparable to those occurring in other major parties and insists that swift disciplinary action is taken when allegations emerge. In several cases, the party suspended individuals even before charges were formally brought, citing safeguarding concerns.

Critics, however, contend that the volume and gravity of cases linked to Sinn Féin is “disproportionately high,” particularly compared with other parties of similar size. They also point to instances where individuals remained active in local structures despite concerns being flagged, or where the party leadership sought to distance itself, only after legal proceedings became public.

Security analysts note that Sinn Féin’s rapid growth, combined with historically looser local-level structures, may have contributed to inconsistent vetting and oversight. Several of the cases involved long-standing activists who operated within community-based settings with limited central supervision.

Mounting Political Pressure.
Opposition politicians have already moved to capitalise on the issue, arguing that Sinn Féin has yet to demonstrate that it can meet the standards of transparency, safeguarding and organisational discipline expected of a party preparing to lead government.
Privately, some within Sinn Féin acknowledge that the headlines of the past decade, and particularly the high-profile nature of the most serious cases, have caused significant internal discomfort.

The Question for Voters.
As the party continues to anticipates entering government for the first time in the Republic, the question lingers: Can Sinn Féin convincingly reassure the public that its structures, oversight and internal controls are robust enough for national leadership?

The answer may ultimately rest not on the number of individuals charged, but on whether the party can demonstrate that it has learned from its many past failures, and whether voters believe Sinn Féin can uphold the standards it repeatedly demands from other parties in Government.

Climate Change Advisory Council Calls For Faster Action.

Ireland has failed to achieve the targeted emission reductions during the first Carbon Budget period (2021-2025).

Instead of the maximum emissions of 295 million tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent (Mt CO2eq) set out in the Carbon Budget to 2025, we will overshoot by about 10 Mt CO2eq. Whilst acknowledging progress made, the Council warns that this overshoot will need to be paid back in the next Carbon Budget period (2026-2030) making it increasingly difficult to achieve.

The biggest blockage to Ireland’s progress remains our dependence on expensive, harmful fossil fuels, which were subsidised by €4.7bn of taxpayers’ money in 2024.

Launching the final chapter of its Annual Review the Council once again, called out Transport, where emissions remain stubbornly high. Both the Government and the public can do more collectively and individually to make significant emissions reductions. The Council calls for increased expenditure on public transport ensuring efficient, reliable and timely services, increased grants for less expensive electric vehicles (EVs) and the rapid implementation of a demand management strategy to help drive down emissions in this sector.

In addition, the Council has emphasised the critical role that Local Authorities play in driving climate action at community level, especially with the establishment of flagship “decarbonisation zones” within each local authority area. These zones create momentum and deliver locally tailored solutions for households and businesses.

The Council re-emphasised the significant opportunity that Ireland has to invest in households, communities and businesses, rather than paying extremely punitive compliance costs estimated to be up to €26bn for failing to meet EU targets.

Commenting, Ms Marie Donnelly, Chair of the Climate Change Advisory Council said, “In our first Carbon Budget period, progress has undoubtedly been made in the built environment with the roll out of retrofits in our homes, the increased uptake of protected urea in agriculture and the growth in the development of renewable energy especially wind and solar, including on our houses. However, we need to redesign how we commute, heat homes, and power the economy. That means real investment in people, infrastructure, and communities, not more delay.”

“We have the opportunity and the resources to transform Ireland, both in terms of reducing emissions and preparing for future climate events. We must act now because if we don’t, we will pay the financial and societal price by losing out on secure and affordable energy, a healthier and more sustainable society, both today, and for future generations.”

Ahead of Ireland’s Presidency of the European Union, the Council has urged the Government to fully integrate all climate and energy-related EU directives into Irish law within the legally binding time limit.

Government Announces 2 Tipperary Projects Funded Under 2025 Integration Fund.

  • Government announces 117 projects to be funded under the 2025 Integration Fund.
  • €3.6 million will be made available to 117 not-for-profit, civil society and community-based organisations for integration based projects.
  • Grants of up to €100,000 will be allocated to successful organisations to assist in the integration of migrants.

The Irish government announced the names of 117 community-based projects set to receive €3,612,974 in funding under the 2025 Integration Fund. The Fund helps enable community organisations across Ireland to play a greater role in promoting the integration of migrants.

The Integration Fund combines the two funds previously known as the International Protection Integration Fund and the Communities Integration Fund. Since their inception, both funds have provided close to €10m in funding to over 1,000 projects across the country.

Scheme A was open to projects that specifically promote the integration of International Protection Applicants; while Scheme B was open to smaller scale projects that promote the integration of any migrant group. All applications have been assessed against the selection criteria set out in the funding call guidelines.

Of the 2025 Integration Fund Successful Projects, Tipperary benefitted from only two grants, namely:-

Scheme A

Organisation Name.Project Name.Amount.County.
Silver Arch Family Resource Centre.Unity Youth Hub.€94,874.Tipperary.
South Tipperary Development Company.Bridging Language for Employment.€38,900.Tipperary.

Also under Scheme A the other organisations who benefited included:- one in Cavan; two in Cork; three in Donegal; twenty three in Dublin; four in Galway; one in Kerry; one in Kilkenny; two in Limerick; one in Louth; three in Mayo; two in Meath; one in Sligo; one in Westmeath and one in Wexford.

Scheme B

Under Scheme B the other organisations who benefited included:- one in Carlow; two in Clare; five in Cork; four in Donegal and six in Dublin

This level of funding has been made available in 2025 as a targeted measure and parity funding may not be available in future editions of the fund.

Cycling To Fiscal Responsibility? Not When Your Bike Shed Pricier Than My House.

  • €18,611 Per Bike? That’s One Expensive Two-Wheeler Area.
  • Bike Rack or Bank Vault? €336K Suggests the Wheels Were Secured Through Gold Bars.

Simon Harris faced a wave of criticism from the public after news broke about the €336,000 bike shed erected at Leinster House.

Dozens of emails accused the then Taoiseach and other politicians of wasting taxpayer money, with some suggesting the project symbolised everything wrong with government spending priorities.

Leinster House’s Deluxe Bike Hangar: While Taxpayers Wait In The Rain.

An internal audit later found that no value-for-money assessment was carried out before construction began. The controversy intensified after it emerged that a separate €190,000 was being spent on a fitness instructor for TDs.

Failure by OPW to plan “hot air” openings for Tipperary politicians.

Many correspondents expressed anger over what they saw as misplaced priorities, contrasting the bike shed’s cost with ongoing struggles faced by families of children with disabilities and survivors of State institutions.
One disgruntled observer locally in Thurles was heard to quip that a section of the shed should open occasionally, to allow “hot air” to escape, from Tipperary politicians.

FAI Moves To Seek UEFA Ban On Israel.

Questions Raised Over Motivation and Governance.

The Football Association of Ireland (FAI) has voted overwhelmingly to submit a motion to UEFA calling for the suspension of the Israel Football Association (IFA) from European football competitions.

The motion, passed by 74 votes to 7 with 2 abstentions, was adopted at an extraordinary general meeting of the FAI. It urges UEFA to remove Israel from participation in club and international competitions, citing alleged breaches of football governance and human rights obligations.

Grounds for the Motion:
The proposal contends that the Israel Football Association:

  • Operates clubs in illegal settlements in the occupied West Bank, without the consent of the Palestinian Football Association — said to breach UEFA and FIFA statutes.
  • Has failed to uphold UEFA’s anti-racism and equality policies, contrary to Article 7bis of the UEFA Statutes.
  • UEFA has already decided that no European competition matches can take place in Israel due to ongoing security concerns. However, the FAI motion goes further, seeking to completely suspend Israel from all UEFA competitions.

Next Steps and Potential Outcomes:
The FAI’s motion will now be transmitted to UEFA, where it may be considered by the organisation’s Executive Committee or Congress.

If acted upon, the suspension could see:

  • Israeli clubs removed from the Champions League, Europa League, and Conference League.
  • The Israeli national team barred from European Championship and World Cup qualifying campaigns conducted under UEFA.

No formal timetable for discussion or decision has been announced by UEFA.

Potential Consequences
Analysts warn that the move could have wide-ranging implications:
Sporting disruption: Fixtures involving Israeli clubs or national sides could be cancelled or restructured.
Legal risk: The Israel Football Association could challenge any suspension before the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS), arguing that it is politically motivated.
Diplomatic impact: UEFA could face political and commercial pressure from member governments and sponsors.
Precedent: A ban on Israel could prompt demands for similar action in other politically charged situations, raising questions about consistency and governance in sport.
Financial Context: – FAI’s Dependence on State Support.

This debate comes as the FAI continues to rely heavily on Irish Government and UEFA financial assistance.

In January 2020, the State, UEFA and Bank of Ireland agreed a €30 million rescue package to save the FAI from insolvency. This included €20 million in taxpayer funding through Irish government loans and grants.

In October 2025, the Government confirmed a further €3 million allocation in Budget 2026; same to support the development of League of Ireland academies.

This financial dependency has led some observers to ask who exactly initiated or influenced the FAI’s extraordinary meeting and subsequent vote and whether the association consulted adequately with its funding partners before taking a political position of such scale.

Broader Questions: While many within Irish football support calls for greater international accountability, others caution that the FAI, still emerging from years of financial crisis and governance reform, must act with care to avoid drawing itself into complex geopolitical disputes.

As UEFA weighs its response, the move has sparked debate not only about Israel’s role in European football, but also about the role of the Irish football authorities themselves, an organisation dependent on public funds now taking a stand on one of the most divisive issues in world sport.