A new €3.9 million national funding initiative has been launched to support innovative cybersecurity research, protect critical infrastructure and strengthen Ireland’s ability to respond to emerging digital threats.
The Research Ireland-Cyber Security Innovation Challenge 2026 was announced by Minister of State at the Department of Justice, Home Affairs and Migration, Ms Catherine Ardagh TD, in partnership with Research Ireland and the National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC). The programme aims to bring together researchers, industry specialists and public sector organisations to develop practical solutions to some of Ireland’s most pressing cybersecurity challenges.
With cyberattacks becoming increasingly sophisticated and disruptive, the initiative represents a significant investment in strengthening national security, safeguarding businesses and protecting essential public services. The funding programme will concentrate on five priority areas: improving national cyber threat detection and response capabilities, supporting Ireland’s transition to post-quantum cryptography, strengthening cybersecurity preparedness among small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), enhancing the protection of critical national infrastructure, and encouraging disruptive ideas capable of transforming cybersecurity practices.
Successful research teams will initially qualify for funding of up to €50,000 during a Concept Phase, allowing them to assess proposed solutions, validate their ideas and establish multidisciplinary partnerships. Projects demonstrating strong potential may subsequently advance to a Seed Phase, receiving up to €200,000 to develop and test their solutions further. The programme will culminate in a competitive Prize Phase, with one winning team eligible for a €1 million award to support advanced development and move its innovation closer to practical deployment.
Minister Ms Ardagh emphasised the importance of investing in research and innovation to protect Ireland’s economy, national security and increasingly digital society. The initiative is intended to encourage collaboration across academic, industrial and government sectors, while developing solutions capable of addressing real-world threats. The NCSC has identified the growing complexity and frequency of cyber incidents as major challenges requiring stronger detection, prevention, response and recovery capabilities. Particular attention will be given to preparing Ireland for emerging technological risks, including advances in quantum computing that could undermine existing encryption systems.
Research Ireland has also highlighted the value of interdisciplinary research, stakeholder engagement and practical innovation in delivering lasting improvements to national cyber resilience. Beyond strengthening Ireland’s cybersecurity capabilities, the programme is expected to encourage research collaboration, support technological advancement and create opportunities for innovative solutions benefiting businesses, public institutions and wider society.
The Irish Government has decided that RTÉ will receive €240 million in public funding in 2027 instead of the €260 million previously promised.
That statement raises two important questions: Is the Government justified in holding back the extra €20 million? And has RTÉ delivered the reforms it promised in return for such substantial public funding?
RTÉ Director General Mr Kevin Bakhurst strongly disagrees with the Government’s decision. He says RTÉ planned its future on the basis of a three-year Government funding commitment and that changing the figure at this late stage will affect its five-year strategy. And he has a point. But taxpayers are also entitled to look at what RTÉ promised to deliver in return. What happened to the promised staff reductions? One of RTÉ’s major reform commitments was to become a smaller and more efficient organisation. RTÉ’s strategy proposed reducing its workforce by up to 400 positions, roughly 20% of its workforce, over the five-year transformation programme. Its 2025 Voluntary Exit Programme was therefore an important first test. RTÉ received 325 applications from staff wishing to leave, and RTÉ itself said its target for 2025 was “over 100” exits under the voluntary scheme. What actually happened? Only 67 employees left through the Voluntary Exit Programme in 2025. RTÉ also abolished or “suppressed” another 30 posts, giving a headline figure of 97 positions removed.
But there is an important distinction. Sixty seven people actually left through the redundancy programme. The additional 30 were posts removed following other departures or organisational changes. Therefore, against RTÉ’s own stated target of more than 100 voluntary exits in 2025, only 67 were achieved. That means the actual redundancy programme delivered roughly two-thirds of its first-year target. And RTÉ still has a very considerable distance to travel if it is to achieve its overall ambition of reducing staff numbers by up to 400.
RTÉ’s own internal review subsequently acknowledged that the voluntary exit scheme failed to produce departures on the scale required. It found that the criteria were restrictive, the application period was too short and that, if the experience were repeated, RTÉ might have to make around 500 offers to achieve 300 exits. That surely strengthens the Government’s argument that the promised transformation has not progressed as quickly as expected.
What about RTÉ’s €22.5 million surplus?
RTÉ reported a €22.5 million surplus for 2025. At first glance that produces an obvious question: Why does an organisation reporting a €22.5m surplus need another €20m from Government? The answer is more complicated. RTÉ says some planned expenditure was postponed into 2026 and that part of the surplus arose from accounting adjustments rather than cash sitting unused. It also says €9.6 million resulted from the release of accounting provisions and accruals, so that portion should not simply be regarded as spare cash.
Nevertheless, taxpayers are entitled to ask:
Exactly which projects were postponed?
How much did each project cost?
How much of the €22.5m surplus represented genuine underspending?
And why isn’t that information presented in a simple, easily understood breakdown?
RTÉ receives much more than €240 million overall. There is another important point often overlooked in this debate. RTÉ does not operate on €240 million alone. In 2025 its total revenue was approximately €383.4 million. That included licence-fee income, additional Government funding and substantialcommercial income from advertising and other activities. So the €240m being discussed is RTÉ’s public-funding allocation, is not the broadcaster’s entire annual income. RTÉ operates television channels, radio stations, news services, RTÉ Player, digital services, regional reporting, Irish-language broadcasting, sport, drama, entertainment, documentaries and cultural programming. Nobody seriously suggests all of this can be provided for nothing. But when hundreds of millions of euro of public money are involved, the public is entitled to know exactly what it is buying.
Where is all the money going? There should be a straightforward annual statement telling taxpayers:
How much goes on staff?
How much goes on management?
How much goes on television and radio programmes?
How much goes on sports rights?
How much goes to independent producers?
How much goes on buildings and property?
How much goes on technology?
How much has actually been saved?
And crucially, How many of the promised redundancies and staff reductions have actually happened?
The Government certainly has questions to answer. It publicly committed itself to predictable multi-year funding and RTÉ understandably made plans on that basis, but RTÉ also made commitments. It promised a smaller, more agile organisation and proposed reducing staffing by up to 400 positions. In the first major voluntary redundancy programme, RTÉ sought more than 100 exits. Despite receiving 325 applications, only 67 people ultimately departed under that scheme. That cannot reasonably be described as the level of progress originally envisaged. Public funding should come with public accountability. So perhaps the real question is not simply whether RTÉ should receive €240m or €260m.
It is this: Before another €20 million of taxpayers’ money is handed over, shouldn’t RTÉ be required to show clearly how the money already provided has been spent, why its redundancy programme fell short of its own target, how it intends to achieve the promised reduction of up to 400 positions and exactly what measurable reforms the public/taxpayer is getting in return?
Not before time, owners of derelict properties across Co. Tipperary are facing a tougher new regime as the Government moves to increase pressure on long-neglected buildings and bring more vacant properties back into use.
Budget 2027 has put dereliction firmly back on the agenda, with plans for a new ‘Derelict Property Tax’ intended to strengthen enforcement nationally. For Tipperary, however, the crackdown is already well under way. Tipperary County Council says the number of properties on its Derelict Sites Register rose from 84 in January 2025 to more than 120 by the end of that year, as its Vacant Homes Team stepped up efforts to identify neglected buildings and engage with owners. The Council has also initiated compulsory purchase proceedings, with one property already transferred into Council ownership.
Owners face a clear choice. At present, once a property is entered on the Derelict Sites Register, Tipperary County Council can require its owner to carry out works to remove the dereliction. Failure to act can lead to financial penalties, an annual levy equivalent to 7% of the property’s market value, court proceedings or, ultimately, the property being acquired through a Compulsory Purchase Order.
That means the message to owners is becoming increasingly clear:
Repair it. Sell it. Bring it back into use. Or face escalating intervention.
Tipperary is already identifying more properties The increase in properties appearing on the county’s register is significant. Rather than waiting for complaints alone, the Council says its teams have been actively identifying vacant and derelict sites throughout Co. Tipperary and intensifying engagement with owners. Residents can also report suspected vacant or derelict properties, which the Council’s Vacant Homes Team can then investigate and follow up with the owner. This could have major implications for all towns and villages where abandoned houses, former shops and deteriorating buildings have remained unused for years.
But there is money available to save these buildings The Government’s approach is not based solely on taxation and enforcement. Owners and purchasers of qualifying properties in Tipperary can currently receive up to €50,000 through the Vacant Property Refurbishment Grant, with an additional €20,000, where the building is confirmed as derelict. That means a qualifying derelict property could receive grant assistance of up to €70,000 to bring it back into residential use. The scheme is already having a substantial impact locally. By the time Tipperary County Council prepared its 2026 budget, it had received 784 applications, approved 576 of them and recorded more than €33 million in housing investment through the programme. More than 200 completed properties had already returned to occupation.
Empty rooms over shops are also being targeted. A further initiative launched this year could make a significant difference to Tipperary’s town centres. Since March 2026, grants of up to €135,000 have been available to help convert qualifying vacant space above commercial premises into homes. There is also additional funding where an entire former commercial building is being converted into multiple residential units. These measures could prove particularly important in traditional Tipperary town centres, where many street-level shops remain in use, while upper floors have stood empty for decades.
A major test for Tipperary, The policies are now in place. The real question is whether enforcement will follow. Tipperary has hundreds of buildings and sites capable of becoming homes, businesses or community facilities instead of remaining boarded up and deteriorating. The Government and local authorities are increasingly combining grants for those willing to act with financial penalties and compulsory purchase powers for properties that remain derelict. For owners, the days when an abandoned building could simply be left untouched indefinitely may be coming to an end. For the people of Tipperary, the hope will be that this new push does more than add names to a register.
The real measure of success will be seeing boarded-up and crumbling properties restored, occupied and brought back into the life of our towns and villages.
The Government has announced Budget 2027, with a number of changes aimed at helping with the cost of living.
Here are some of the main points in simple terms:
Income Tax. The amount you can earn before paying the higher 40% rate of income tax is increasing to €46,500. The main personal and employee tax credits are also increasing by €125 each, meaning many workers should pay less income tax.
Minimum Wage The national minimum wage is increasing by 79 cent an hour to €14.94.
Pensions & Social Welfare The State Pension and most main weekly social welfare payments will increase by €10 per week. The Fuel Allowance is also increasing by €5 per week to €43.
Disability Support A new €500 cost-of-disability payment is being introduced, with the first payment expected in January 2027.
Renters The Rent Tax Credit is increasing to €1,150 for a single renter and up to €2,300 for a jointly assessed couple.
First-Time Buyers The maximum available under the Help-to-Buy Scheme is increasing from €30,000 to €35,000 for eligible first-time buyers purchasing or building a new home.
Childcare There will be increased childcare support, with the Government aiming to reduce costs for families. Childcare fees are to be capped at €550 per month under the new measures, with some families potentially saving around €1,000 a year per child.
Students Third-level student fees are expected to fall by a further €150, alongside additional supports for some families with more than one child attending college.
Petrol, Diesel & Heating Existing reductions in excise duty on petrol and diesel are being extended through the winter and into the spring. There will also be relief on carbon tax for home heating, with further increases on home heating oil and gas being paused.
Home Energy More than €650 million is being provided for home energy improvements, including solar panels, battery grants and other energy-efficiency measures.
Cigarettes A packet of 20 cigarettes will increase by €1, with additional taxation also being introduced on vaping products.
Overall Budget 2027 contains a mixture of tax cuts, higher welfare payments and additional supports for childcare, housing and energy costs. As always, how much you gain from the Budget will depend on your own circumstances, including your income, family situation and whether you rent, own a home or receive social welfare.
A plaque is being unveiled in Glenties, Co. Donegal, honouring one of the most remarkable humanitarian figures of the Irish Great Famine; the Polish explorer, scientist and relief worker Sir Paweł Edmund Strzelecki (KCMG CB FRS FRGS DC), also known as Paul Edmund de Strzelecki and Sir Paul Strzelecki, (1797–1873).
Strzelecki became the principal agent in Ireland for theBritish Association for the Relief of Distress in Ireland and Scotland, better known as the British Relief Association. Born near Poznań, capital of the Wielkopolska region, he was already internationally known as an explorer and scientist when, in January 1847, he volunteered for unpaid relief work in Ireland. He was initially given responsibility for the desperately affected western counties of Donegal, Mayo and Sligo, and based himself for a time in Westport, Co. Mayo. [Strzelecki was also later associated with Florence Nightingale and helped her in facilitating the publication of a series of her articles.]
Sir Paweł Edmund Strzelecki, (1797–1873)
There he saw at first hand the devastation caused by hunger, disease and the collapse of ordinary life. His most important humanitarian initiative was the development of a scheme to feed starving children directly through schools. By March 1848, nearly 200,000 children were receiving school meals, while clothing was also distributed. The scheme was non-denominational and contemporary colleagues believed that it saved many young lives.
The British Relief Association’s funds were largely exhausted by the summer of 1848, and its main operations came to an end. But Strzelecki’s work for Ireland did not. Following another disastrous potato failure, he returned to Ireland in June 1849, using charitable money raised in Britain, through his own advocacy, and it is this return that raises a fascinating question for County Tipperary.
Did Strzelecki Visit the town of Cashel? Between June and September 1849, Strzelecki undertook an extraordinary relief journey. Research by historians Professor Peter Gray and Dr Emily Mark-FitzGerald records that he travelled approximately 2,700 miles across Connaught and Munster, distributing a further £6,400 (approximately £1,055,509.76 in 2026), in charitable aid. Strzelecki was not confined to the western counties he had first visited in 1847. In 1849 he was travelling extensively through Munster as well as Connacht, and County Tipperary, of course, is part of Munster. So could that 2,700-mile journey have brought him to Cashel? At present, we cannot say that it did. No document yet identified explicitly states that Strzelecki visited Cashel. No known letter headed “Cashel”; newspaper report of his arrival; or other contemporary source presently allows us to claim a visit as historical fact. But there is a genuine reason for asking the question.
At exactly the time Strzelecki was travelling through Connacht and Munster, Cashel Poor Law Union in Tipperary was itself facing a severe humanitarian and financial crisis and Cashel was being discussed in Parliament because of that crisis. It is important to be clear about this point. Parliament was not discussing Cashel because Strzelecki was known to have visited. Cashel was being discussed because thousands of people were dependent on poor relief and because the Union’s ability to finance that relief had become gravely strained.
On 17 May 1849, the House of Commons heard that 12,000 poor people in Cashel Union, Tipperary were receiving outdoor relief. The situation was described in stark terms: even this relief was said to be insufficient to keep people alive, and some recipients were reportedly selling part of their ration of yellow meal simply to obtain clothing. This was not merely a hunger crisis. It was also a crisis of the Poor Law system itself.
Poor Law Unions were expected to raise much of their money locally through rates, but years of famine had devastated tenants, occupiers, landlords and the productive capacity of the land. Large numbers remained dependent upon relief while the people expected to finance that relief were themselves increasingly impoverished. Cashel came before Parliament again on July 13th1849, right in the middle of Strzelecki’s 1849 journey. The House of Lords considered estimates for a number of distressed Poor Law Unions. For Cashel, Poor Law Commissioner Sir Edward Twisleton estimated that £20,000 might be collected in rates over the following six months.That estimate was strongly challenged in debate as unrealistic.
A memorial plaque can be found beside Clerys Department Store in Dublin. (Memorial text is in Polish, Irish and English).
The wider figures were alarming: thirty-two unions were said to have debts of about £231,000, (£38,097,298.65 in 2026), while their estimated expenditure for the next six months was £464,000, (£76,524,458 in 2026). Even if projected rate collections were achieved, an enormous deficit would remain.
So Cashel’s appearance in Parliament tells us something very important. The Union was part of the continuing famine emergency, a landscape of mass outdoor relief, indebted Poor Law Unions and exhausted local ratepayers, and at precisely that moment, Strzelecki was travelling 2,700 miles across Connacht and Munster distributing private charitable aid. That coincidence is what makes the Cashel question worth investigating.
The Surviving Cashel Records There is another important development. The original Cashel Poor Law Union Board of Guardians minute books for the famine period survive, and Tipperary Studies has digitised them for public access. The online Cashel collection includes both the 1848–1849 and 1849–1850 minute books, precisely the records covering Strzelecki’s return to Ireland. An original Cashel Rate Book for 1849 also survives online. It runs to 232 pages and records property and rating information for the Cashel electoral division, during the very year in question. Other 1849 rate books survive for electoral divisions within Cashel Union, including places/villages such as Fethard, Drangan, Graystown, Kilpatrick and Tullamain. So far, however, no reference to Strzelecki has been identified in the searchable or indexed portions of the Cashel records.
That does not settle the question. The Board of Guardians minute books are large handwritten manuscript volumes, and not every name, letter, visitor or donation can reliably be found through ordinary text searching. A reference could appear under a variant spelling, as “Count Strzelecki”, in a piece of incoming correspondence, in the record of a donation, or simply in handwriting that has never been indexed. The proper next stage is therefore a page-by-page examination of the Cashel Guardians’ minutes for the summer of 1849, particularly from July to early September. Historians should look not just for Strzelecki’s name but for:- letters from London or Dublin; private charitable donations; relief remittances; visiting relief agents; special grants; outside assistance; and references to individuals distributing charitable funds.
So, Did Strzelecki Come To Cashel, in Co. Tipperary? We still cannot say yes. But we can now state the historical circumstances much more clearly. In the summer of 1849 Paul Strzelecki travelled approximately 2,700 miles across Connacht and Munster distributing charitable aid. During those same months Cashel Poor Law Union was supporting around 12,000 people on outdoor relief and was being discussed in Parliament because of the enormous financial strain created by continuing famine distress. The original Cashel Board of Guardians records for that period survive, and are publicly available for investigation. What remains missing is the final documentary link placing Strzelecki himself in Cashel.
So the responsible conclusion remains: Did Paul Strzelecki Visit Cashel In 1849? Possibly, but not yet proven. What makes the possibility so intriguing is that we now know the scale of his movements. This was not a short journey through a handful of familiar western districts. It was a 2,700-mile humanitarian journey across Connacht and Munster, undertaken during a summer when Cashel was experiencing exactly the type of continuing distress Strzelecki had returned to Ireland to relieve. As Glenties commemorates this remarkable Polish humanitarian, perhaps it is also an appropriate time for Cashel and County Tipperary to examine their own surviving famine records.
Somewhere in those handwritten pages may yet lie the answer to one fascinating local question; “Did Paul Strzelecki Travel To Cashel?“
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish.AcceptRead More
Privacy & Cookies Policy
Privacy Overview
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
Recent Comments