Ireland’s political and media class increasingly seems trapped in a cycle of outrage, where emotion appear to matters more than realism.
The recent arrest of Dr. Margaret Connolly; sister of Irish President Mrs Catherine Connolly; on board a Ga, so called aid flotilla immediately caused uproar in Irish political and media circles. Government figures condemned Israel, activists treated the incident as a major international drama, and RTÉ coverage became highly emotional.
At the same time, Eurovision exposed another reality that many activists do not want to face. Despite loud campaigns demanding Israel be excluded, Israel still took part in Eurovision and finished in second place. RTÉ and several other broadcasters boycotted the contest over Israel’s participation, but Eurovision went ahead anyway without their participation. So will RTE, who this year ignored licence fee payers, decide to repeat this boycotting scenario again next year?
That raises a very simple question; what exactly is the long-term plan? If the goal is somehow to make Israel disappear, that is not serious politics. Israel is not going anywhere. It is a strong country with major international alliances, a powerful economy, and the world’s largest Jewish population.
If the goal is to isolate Israelis from international events, that also appears to be failing. Eurovision continued. International organisations continue working with Israel. Trade continues. Sporting and cultural events continue. And if Israel competes again next year in Sofia, Bulgaria, the wider world will largely move on, regardless of any Irish outrage.
This is where many ordinary people are beginning to lose patience with what critics now call the “Paddystinian” movement.
Many feel the movement has gone far beyond criticism of Israeli government policy and has become something more obsessive and even hostile. Criticising Israel is perfectly legitimate, just as criticism of any government is legitimate. But when every issue becomes centred around Israel, people naturally begin asking questions.
There is also growing concern about the atmosphere being created for Jewish people living in Ireland. Across Europe, Jewish communities have reported rising hostility and intimidation since the Gaza conflict intensified. Many Irish Jews now feel increasingly uncomfortable speaking openly about their identity or opinions. That should rightly alarm decent people.
A country can support Palestinian civilians without turning hostility toward Israel into a national obsession. It is possible to care about Gaza while also rejecting hatred, intimidation, and political hysteria.
Many people now treat attending such weekend protests in major cities as a kind of social pastime, with large numbers taking part, despite having only a limited understanding of the history or complexities behind the issues involved.
Unfortunately, parts of Irish public debate no longer seem interested in balance or nuance. Too often, disagreement is treated as proof of moral failure. Anyone who questions the dominant activist narrative, risks abuse, smears, or social pressure. That is not healthy democratic debate.
Ireland once had a reputation as a calm, sensible country known for diplomacy and peace-building. Increasingly, however, parts of Irish politics and media appear more interested in performative outrage than practical solutions. Meanwhile, the rest of the world simply keeps moving.
Israel continues trading internationally, participating in global events, building alliances, and developing economically. Eurovision survived the RTE boycott. International audiences still voted for the Israeli entry in huge numbers. That reality may be uncomfortable for activists, but it is reality nonetheless.
Movements built mainly on anger and grievance eventually run into a problem: outrage alone is not a strategy. Shouting louder does not necessarily change minds. In fact, constant moral lecturing often pushes ordinary people away, and that may ultimately be the biggest danger for Ireland itself. Because countries that become consumed by ideological crusades can end up isolating themselves far more than the people they are trying to punish.
In the end, most people simply want balance, common sense, and a bit of perspective, not this endless outrage, division, and political theatre pumped out on news bulletins and via social media.
If the Roads Around Cashel Fall Silent, Best Turn for Home.
If you find yourself out late around the town of Cashel, Co. Tipperary, take a bit of advice from the old people; go home before the road goes quiet.
Tourists especially beware, because according to the folklore of the Galtee country, there are worse things abroad at night than a Garda checkpoint or a missed Fish & Chipper.
Rock of Cashel, Co. Tipperary.
Long before horror films discovered the headless horseman, Ireland already had the Dullahan, latter a charming individual who travelled the roads carrying his own head under his arm and announcing death wherever he stopped. No door lock kept him out. No gate latch held him back. The only known deterrent was gold, which feels very Irish altogether. Even supernatural evil respects inflation.
The most entertaining version of the tale comes from an old story called “The Good Woman”, collected by Thomas Crofton Croker in the nineteenth century. The story is set around the Galtee Mountains and Cashel, where a horse dealer named Larry Dodd makes the sort of decision that proves Irish folklore exists mainly to warn men against acting the maggot after dark.
Larry is riding home from Cashel one June evening after buying a horse. He’s feeling pleased with himself, no doubt after “just the one pint” that became several. Along the road he meets a mysterious cloaked woman walking alone at twilight.
Now, any sensible person in rural Ireland knows there are only three explanations for a woman silently appearing on a lonely road after sunset; a banshee, a fairy, trouble. Larry, unfortunately, ignores centuries of accumulated wisdom and offers her a lift. She says nothing. Climbs up behind him. Still says nothing, which, to be fair, should have been the first warning sign to any member of the male species.
Eventually the horse stops near the ruins of an old church. The woman slips down soundlessly and glides away across the graveyard. Larry, displaying the sort of judgement that has doomed Irish men since mythology began, chases after her looking for a kiss and catches her, only to discover she has no head.
At this point the story becomes considerably less romantic. Larry faints dead away and wakes among a gathering of Dullahans; headless ladies and gentlemen, soldiers, priests, musicians and skeletons tossing skulls around like hurling balls. Naturally enough, someone offers him a drink. Well this is still Ireland after all.
Things go poorly from there but eventually he escapes with his life, though not with his dignity, and his horse disappears entirely which may be the most authentically Irish ending imaginable. Survive supernatural terror if you like, but someone is still stealing the livestock.
So if you’re around Cashel late at night and happen to see a silent figure on the roadside, perhaps keep driving. Do not offer lifts. Do not flirt. And, absolutely do not follow mysterious women into ruined churches.
The old stories survive for a reason, and mainly because somebody ignored obvious warning signs and succeeded to live just long enough to warn the rest of us.
Poster published, by Mary Lou McDonald, (Sinn Féin).
Serious concern has been expressed following the appearance of Arab Barghouti, son of convicted Palestinian militant leader Marwan Barghouti, at the most recent Sinn Féin Ard Fheis in Belfast.
According to reports from the event, Arab Barghouti addressed delegates and supporters to sustained applause during proceedings focused on international solidarity and Middle East issues. Critics have described the reception as deeply inappropriate given the violent history associated with his father.
Marwan Barghouti is currently serving multiple life sentences in Israel after being convicted in 2004 for involvement in attacks that killed five civilians during the Second Intifada. Israeli courts found him guilty on several counts of murder and membership in a terrorist organisation. While some political activists, sadly, continue to portray him as a symbol of Palestinian resistance; while many victims’ families and international observers regard him accurately as directly responsible for acts of terrorism that caused immense civilian suffering.
Opponents of Sinn Féin’s decision to provide a platform for Arab Barghouti argue that inviting representatives connected to individuals convicted of orchestrating deadly attacks risks undermining efforts to promote peace, reconciliation and respect for innocent victims of violence.
“This was not simply a controversial political appearance,” one critic stated. “It amounted to the normalisation and sanitisation of terrorism in front of a large public audience. The victims of these attacks, and their families, deserve better than to see applause for those associated with such unbelievable brutality.”
The controversy has also reignited debate around the responsibilities of political parties when selecting international speakers for major public conferences. Commentators have argued that democratic institutions should remain vigilant against attempts to romanticise or rewrite the legacy of political violence, regardless of where it occurred.
A similar sentiments were widely expressed on Tuesday April 28th last, when Arab Barghouti addressed a public meeting in at a pub in Cross Guns, Dublin 9. The event, promoted online by pro-Palestinian activists and Sinn Féin supporters, focused on solidarity with Palestinian prisoners and support for Marwan Barghouti, the jailed Palestinian political figure and former Fatah leader. Again attendees heard speeches concerning the situation in Gaza, Palestinian prisoners, and international solidarity campaigns. Promotional material referred to Marwan Barghouti as a “jailed Palestinian leader,” while critics again noted that he was convicted by an Israeli court for involvement in attacks that killed civilians during the Second Intifada.
Others have defended the invitation on the grounds of international solidarity with the Palestinian cause, noting that Marwan Barghouti remains a widely recognised political figure among many Palestinians and international campaigners.
Nevertheless, critics maintain that no political grievance can justify the targeting and killing of civilians, and that public representatives should be careful not to blur the distinction between political advocacy and the glorification of violence and hatred.
Bournea Reaching Out Historical Society had another very successful Lecture on Tuesday April 28th 2026.
Tim Maher Reports:
Dr John Reynolds a former member of An Garda Siochana at Templemore Garda College and well-known historian, lectured on the Foundation of An Garda Siochana in 1922 and the Templemore Museum and Archives.
Our vice Chairperson Michael Costigan introduced Dr. John Reynolds to the audience on behave of our non-resident Chairperson Christine Timoney who lives in Australia. Michael welcomed John to Lismackin Hall on behalf of Bournea Reaching Out Historical Society and gave a brief summery of his achievements to date.
Photo shows Dr. John Reynolds with members of ‘Bournea Reaching Out Historical Society’. Pic: Courtesy Tim Maher
Dr Reynolds detailed the changeover from the RIC (Royal Irish Constabulary) armed police force of the United Kingdom in Ireland from 1822 until 1922, to the unarmed Irish police force An Garda Siochana, and how they managed the changeover after the Irish War of Independence and during the Irish Civil War.
After a tea break and a chat, he continued the second part of his lecture on how he set up the Templemore Garda Museum. He told us, he had hundreds of visitors per week from home and abroad visiting. They had groups of school children, tourist, and many other groups, like ourselves, visiting before the COVID-19 virus hit. When the pandemic was over,unfortunately the museum was never opened again and some parts move to a new Dubin Garda museum.
We finished up with our vice chairperson Michael Costigan thanking him for his time and his wonderful lectures. Dr Reynolds said he would be delighted to come again to lecture on a different subject. He is the author of two books that he had for sale, ‘The Templemore Miracles‘ and ‘46 Men Dead‘.
We had a great turnout and thanks to everyone who attended and made it a great night.
“Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” — Attributed to philosopher George Santayana.
Antisemitism, or prejudice and discrimination against Jewish people, has existed for centuries but has sadly seen renewed global concern in recent years due to rising hate crimes, extremist rhetoric, and worst of all, online misinformation.
An example of this is the rise in anti-Semitism and growing tensions around the Ireland v Israel soccer match, causing deep concern across Irish communities. While people have strong views on the middle east conflict, there is an urgent need for restraint, calm language, and respect for public safety. Calls for protests by poorly informed individuals around the match have increased in recent weeks, but many believe demonstrations should be halted to avoid further division, intimidation, or violence, and to ensure the focus remains on peace, dialogue, and the protection of all communities from hate crime.
“Those that fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it.“ — Quote attributed to Sir Winston Churchill.
Amin al-Husseini.
On May 6th, 1943, one of the most controversial figures in Middle Eastern history, Muslim leader Amin al-Husseini, (1897-1974), sent a letter to the Bulgarian government objecting to a proposal that would have allowed thousands of Jewish children to escape Europe and immigrate to British Mandate Palestine. This letter remains one of the clearest documented examples of the Mufti’s▲ active collaboration with Nazi Germany and his opposition to Jewish rescue efforts during the Holocaust.
▲ Mufti: An Islamic legal scholar qualified to issue fatwas (religious decrees).
During World War II, the former Grand Mufti of Jerusalem became closely aligned with the Axis powers. After fleeing the Middle East, following anti-British unrest in Iraq, Husseini settled in Berlin, where he was welcomed by senior Nazi officials and supported by the German government.
While in Germany, he broadcast pro-Nazi and antisemitic propaganda in Arabic; encouraged resistance against Britain and the Allies; opposed all Jewish immigration to Palestine, and recruited Muslims into Waffen-SS units operating in the Balkans. In November 1941, Husseini met directly with Adolf Hitler in Berlin. Records of the meeting show that both men discussed opposition to Jews and British influence in the Middle East.
The Bulgarian Rescue Proposal. By 1943, reports of the mass murder of European Jews had begun spreading internationally. At the same time, efforts were underway to rescue Jewish children trapped in Nazi-controlled territory. One proposal involved allowing approximately 4,000 Jewish children and several hundred accompanying adults to leave Bulgaria for British Mandate Palestine. Husseini strongly opposed the plan. According to historical records cited by the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum and multiple historians, he contacted German and allied officials to block the transfer. In correspondence connected to these rescue efforts, Husseini argued that Jews should not be allowed to emigrate to Palestine and suggested they instead be sent to places where they would remain under tighter control, including Poland.
Jews Being Deported To Treblinka 1942.
What “Poland” Meant in 1943. By May 1943, Nazi-occupied Poland had become the centre of the Holocaust. Extermination camps including Auschwitz-Birkenau, Treblinka, Sobibor, and Majdanek were operating there, and hundreds of thousands of Jews had already been murdered. The Warsaw Ghetto Uprising had just been crushed weeks earlier. Children sent to Auschwitz-Birkenau,Treblinka,Sobibor,and Majdanek were primarily targeted for immediate extermination, with the vast majority murdered in gas chambers upon arrival. Jewish children were deemed “unfit for labour,” leading to instant separation from parents and death. In Auschwitz-Birkenau, over 200,000 children were killed immediately upon arrival, together with over 700 babies born there, murdered prior to late 1944. Treblinka and Sobibor in fact were pure death camps (Operation Reinhard). Children, alongside adults, were usually sent immediately to the gas chambers upon arrival. Majdanek Functioned as both a concentration and extermination camp, where children were either immediately murdered or faced death through starvation, disease, and, in some cases, older children were kept for forced labour.
Some children were kept in “family camps”(often to be murdered later) or used for sadistic medical experiments. Only about 700 children were alive upon liberation in January 1945.
Historians generally agree that senior Nazi collaborators, such as Husseini, were aware that deportations to Poland placed Jews in grave danger, though scholars continue debating precisely how much he knew about the mechanics of the extermination process itself.
Collaboration Beyond Propaganda Husseini’s wartime role extended beyond speeches and diplomacy. Historical documentation confirms that he worked closely with senior Nazi figures including Heinrich Himmler and Joachim von Ribbentrop. He also helped recruit Muslim volunteers for Nazi military formations in Bosnia and the Balkans. Photographs and wartime records additionally place him visiting Nazi facilities and meeting SS leadership during the war years. At the same time, many historians caution against exaggerating his role. Institutions such as Yad Vashem▲, note that while Husseini was unquestionably a Nazi collaborator and antisemite, there is no evidence he was one of the architects of the Holocaust itself.
The Core Message of Husseini Letter. The May 1943 correspondence remains historically significant because it demonstrates that Husseini was not merely sympathetic to Nazi Germany in abstract political terms. He actively intervened against efforts to rescue Jewish refugees. The central theme of the Mufti’s correspondence was unmistakable; Jewish refugees must not be allowed to reach Palestine. Historical records show that Husseini urged Axis-aligned governments to prevent Jewish emigration to the Middle East and instead redirected Jews to territories where they would remain under Nazi authority and surveillance. One of the most chilling lines associated with these communications was his recommendation that Jews be sent to countries “where they would find themselves under active control, for example, in Poland.”
For many historians and commentators, this episode illustrates how antisemitism, wartime Arab nationalism, and Nazi ideology intersected during World War II. Others caution against using Husseini’s actions to generalize about all Palestinians or all Arab political movements, noting that political views across the Arab world were never uniform.
What is beyond serious historical dispute, however, is that the Grand Mufti aligned himself with Nazi Germany, spread antisemitic propaganda, and opposed attempts to allow Jewish refugees to escape to Palestine during the Holocaust.
That aside, there is a strong current argument that sport should continue independently of politics. Supporters of that view see international sport as one of the few arenas where countries and peoples still meet under shared rules, even during periods of political conflict. They further argue that former Ireland manager and women’s captain Brian Kerr and Louise Quinn; together with Shamrock Rovers captain Roberto Lopes; musician Christy Moore; bands Fontaines DC and Kneecap, are not elected government ministers, and that ordinary supporters should not automatically be treated as representatives of Irish State policy. Anger tends to be most effective when it is channelled into a coherent ethical stance rather than confrontation for its own sake. Targeting Jewish people, Israeli civilians, or individual athletes with abuse, undermines the moral credibility protesters may want/wish to project.
Bodies like UEFA and FIFA generally resist team exclusions unless there is overwhelming international consensus or direct breaches of competition rules. The FAI has publicly argued that refusing to fulfil fixtures could damage Irish football competitively and institutionally.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish.AcceptRead More
Privacy & Cookies Policy
Privacy Overview
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
Recent Comments