Archives

Death Of William Connolly, Formerly Of Thurles, Co. Tipperary.

It was with great sadness that we learned of the death, today Wednesday 21st October 2026, of Mr William Connolly, Kilnamanagh, Co. Dublin and formerly of Holycross, Thurles, Co. Tipperary.

Pre-deceased by his wife Margaret; Mr Connolly passed away peacefully, surrounded by his loving family, while in the care of staff at Kiltipper Woods Care Centre, Kiltipper Road, Kiltipper, Dublin 24.

His passing is most deeply regretted, sadly missed and lovingly remembered by his sorrowing family; sons Liam, Shay, Paddy, Martin, Mick and Barry; sisters Mary and Sal, daughters-in-law Janet, Michelle and Lisa, sister-in-law, grandchildren, great grandchildren, nephews, nieces, extended relatives, neighbours and friends.

Requiescat in Pace.

Funeral Arrangements.

The earthly remains of Mr Connolly will repose at the Ramon Massey & Son Funeral Home No.3 Main Street, Tallaght Village, Dublin D24, (Eircode D24 NY65, opposite The Priory), on Thursday afternoon from 4:00pm until 7:00pm same evening.
His remains will be received into the Church of St Kevin, Treepark Road, Kilnamanagh, Dublin 24, (Eircode D24 V8W8) on Friday morning to further repose for Requiem Mass at 10:00am, followed, immediately afterwards, by interment in Newlands Cross Cemetery, Ballymount Road., Ballymount, Dublin 24, (Eircode D24 KICY).

For those persons who would wish to attend Requiem Mass for Mr Connolly, but for reasons cannot, same can be viewed streamed live online, HERE.

The extended Connolly family wish to express their appreciation for your understanding at this difficult time, and have made arrangements for those persons wishing to send messages of condolence, to use the link shown HERE.

Bovine TB Confirmed On Nine Irish Pig Farms Across Five Counties.

But Which Counties Are Affected?

Bovine tuberculosis (TB) has been confirmed in pig herds on nine farms across five counties in Ireland during 2026, raising fresh questions about the spread of the disease, its impact on pig farmers, and the need for greater transparency over where infections have occurred.

The Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine (DAFM) confirmed the cases in a report published on 21 October 2026. Laboratory testing identified the infection as Mycobacterium bovis, the bacterium responsible for bovine TB, a disease more commonly associated with cattle.
Although TB has occasionally been detected in Irish pigs over the years, the Department has acknowledged an increase in infections during 2026.
However, one important detail remains unanswered: which five counties are affected?

How Was TB Detected in the Pigs?
Unlike cattle, which are subject to a national TB testing programme, pigs are generally not routinely tested for tuberculosis while on farms. Instead, infections are usually discovered during post-mortem veterinary inspections at meat processing plants.
Where suspicious lesions are found, samples undergo laboratory examination to determine whether Mycobacterium bovis is present.
According to the Department, most infected pigs do not display obvious clinical symptoms, meaning infection may remain undetected until slaughter.
Following detection, affected farms may be required to undertake herd testing under veterinary supervision. Testing involves a skin test similar to that used in cattle, with results assessed approximately 72 hours later. Pigs confirmed to be infected are subsequently slaughtered.

Nine Farms Affected – A Significant Development.
Ireland has approximately 300 pig farms, and the identification of infection on nine farms therefore represents around 3% of the country’s pig farms.
While that does not mean 3% of Irish pigs are infected, the number of affected farms is significant enough to warrant further investigation. The report also indicates that one of the affected farms experienced particularly extensive infection throughout its herd.
For pig producers operating in an already challenging economic environment, the consequences of TB infection can be substantial.

An additional concern is compensation.
Unlike cattle farmers, pig producers do not contribute to the national bovine TB levy, and the Department has indicated that there is currently no equivalent compensation arrangement for affected pig farmers. This raises questions about the financial support available where infection results in the removal of animals.

Which Five Counties Have Been Affected?
Despite confirming that nine pig herds in five counties have tested positive, the Department has not publicly identified those counties in the reporting examined for this article.
Knowing the geographical distribution would help farmers and veterinary professionals better understand the situation.
It would also allow comparisons with the established distribution of bovine TB in cattle.
For example, cattle TB statistics for the 12 months ending August 31st 2025 identified particularly high herd incidence in veterinary districts covering North Tipperary, Wicklow, Meath and Dublin.
Five veterinary districts across the above four counties recorded herd incidence above 10%, with both east and west Wicklow included.
However, it is essential to emphasise that there is currently no evidence establishing that these are among the five counties affected by TB in pigs. Cattle TB incidence statistics cannot be used to identify the locations of pig herd infections.
The publication of a county-level breakdown by the Department would remove this uncertainty without requiring the identification of individual farms.

Could There Be a Link Between TB in Cattle and Pigs?
This is one of the most interesting aspects of the Department’s findings. The Department confirmed that whole-genome sequencing of Mycobacterium bovis isolates from infected pigs, has identified close genetic relationships with TB strains circulating locally.
That finding suggests that the infection in pigs is connected to the wider regional epidemiology of bovine TB. However, a close genetic relationship does not establish the precise route of transmission.
Bovine TB can affect several mammalian species, and possible transmission pathways require careful veterinary and epidemiological investigation.
The important questions include whether infections are associated with local cattle, wildlife, contaminated environments or other sources. Establishing the source of infection is particularly important if further cases are to be prevented.

Is There a Risk to Consumers?
The Department has confirmed that pigs passing the required ante-mortem and post-mortem meat inspections are considered fit for human consumption.
Where suspicious lesions are identified during inspection, further laboratory investigation is undertaken. Although bovine TB is a ‘zoonotic disease’, meaning it can infect humans, the discovery of infected animals should not automatically be interpreted as evidence that contaminated pork has entered the food supply. The existing veterinary inspection system plays an important role in detecting potentially infected animals and protecting food safety.

TB Remains a Major Challenge for Irish Agriculture.
The emergence of additional infections in pigs comes against the background of continuing efforts to control bovine TB in Ireland’s cattle population. In a parliamentary response on October 8th 2026, the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine reported that national cattle herd TB incidence had declined to 5.40% for the 12 months ending September 27th 2026, compared with 6.08% one year, previously. Although this represents an improvement, TB remains a significant animal health and financial challenge.
The Government introduced additional measures during 2026 under its Bovine TB Action Plan, including changes to cattle movement testing and disease-control requirements.
The detection of TB in pigs illustrates that the disease is not exclusively a cattle issue and that wider animal health surveillance remains important.

Questions That Still Need Answers
The Department’s confirmation provides valuable information, but several questions deserve further clarification:

  1. How many of the nine affected farms are located in each county?
  2. Were the cases linked to nearby cattle TB outbreaks or wildlife reservoirs?
  3. Have veterinary investigations identified the likely source of infection?
  4. Will compensation or other financial assistance be considered for affected pig producers?
  5. Which five counties recorded confirmed TB infections in pigs during 2026?

The above are reasonable questions in the public interest. County-level information could be provided without disclosing the identity or exact location of individual farms.

Conclusion: More Information Is Needed
The confirmation of bovine TB on nine pig farms across five Irish counties is an important development for the country’s pig sector. It also highlights the importance of post-slaughter surveillance, veterinary investigation and cooperation between farmers and the Department of Agriculture.
The reported genetic relationship between strains detected in pigs and those circulating locally deserves further scientific attention.
However, the geographical distribution of the cases remains unclear. Identifying the five affected counties would be a useful first step towards understanding the scale and potential sources of the problem. Until those details are released, speculation about the location of affected pig herds would be premature.

Ireland’s Triple Lock – Should We Keep It Or Change It?

The Triple Lock is being debated in Dáil Éireann today, Wednesday, 21st October 2026.

But what exactly is it, and why does it matter to ordinary Irish people?

What is the Triple Lock?
At present, before Ireland can send 12 or more soldiers on certain overseas military missions, three approvals are generally needed:

  1. The United Nations (UN) must authorise the mission.
  2. The Irish Government must approve it.
  3. Dáil Éireann must also approve it.

Hence why it is called the Triple Lock.

What does the Government want to change?
The Government wants to remove the need for UN approval. The Irish Government and Dáil would still have to agree before our troops could be sent on these missions.

Why does the Government want this change?
At present, five powerful countries; America, Russia, China, Britain and France can each block decisions at the UN Security Council. This means that even if Ireland wants to send soldiers on a worthwhile peacekeeping mission, one of these countries could prevent the UN from approving it.
The Government believes Ireland should make its own decisions rather than depend on these powerful countries.

Could this be good for Ireland?
Yes. There are some possible benefits. Ireland could make more of its own decisions. Irish soldiers could take part in more international peacekeeping missions. Our Defence Forces could gain valuable experience. Ireland could work more closely with other European countries. We could help protect people in countries affected by conflict, even when the UN Security Council cannot agree.

But what are the dangers?
There are genuine concerns. Removing UN approval takes away an important safeguard. Future governments might face pressure to join military operations overseas. Irish soldiers could become involved in controversial or dangerous missions. Some people fear this could gradually weaken Ireland’s military neutrality.

Would Ireland be giving up its neutrality?
No, not automatically. Ireland would not suddenly become a member of NATO. We would still have our own Government and Dáil making decisions. However, future governments would have more freedom to decide which overseas military missions Ireland joins. That is why this debate matters.

What would be best for Ireland?
Many people believe Ireland should be able to make its own decisions without Russia, China, America or any other powerful country having the final say. But that freedom must come with strong safeguards.
Our soldiers should only be sent overseas for lawful missions with clear peacekeeping or security purposes, and any decision should face proper scrutiny in the Dáil. Above all, Ireland should protect its long-standing reputation as a neutral country committed to peace.
The Triple Lock should not be removed unless stronger legal safeguards are put in place first. Irish neutrality must be clearly protected in law, not simply promised by politicians. Before our soldiers are sent overseas, there should be proper Dáil approval, independent legal checks and clear proof that the mission is lawful and genuinely necessary. Ireland must never become involved in unlawful wars or military operations that undermine our independence.
We must also protect our Defence Forces. Every overseas mission should have a clear purpose, proper equipment, an assessment of the dangers involved and regular reviews by the Dáil. There should also be meaningful public consultation before major changes are made to our neutrality protections.
The Government argues that removing the UN approval requirement would give Ireland greater freedom to participate in peacekeeping. That is a reasonable argument, but greater freedom must come with greater accountability, not fewer safeguards.
Above all, we must remember that governments come and go. Any new law must protect Ireland not just today, but for future generations.
The public view is simple; Ireland should remain independent, militarily neutral and committed to peace, while retaining the freedom to make its own decisions. We should strengthen those protections before changing the Triple Lock, not afterwards

In conclusion changing the Triple Lock could benefit Ireland, but simply removing UN approval is not enough. We need a system that gives Ireland greater independence, while protecting our neutrality and ensuring that Irish soldiers are never sent into unnecessary conflicts.

Sinn Féin Demands Crackdown On Drug Gangs – But Also Backs Drug Decriminalisation

A Question of Political Accountability.

Today in Dáil Éireann, Sinn Féin demanded urgent Government action against criminal gangs threatening families over unpaid drug debts.

Mr Matt Carthy TD, Sinn Féin’s spokesperson on Justice, introduced a motion calling for an immediate crackdown on drug-debt intimidation.
Mr David Cullinane TD, Sinn Féin’s Waterford representative, spoke of the devastation caused by the horrific deaths of the English family in Waterford and demanded stronger State action.
Mr Mark Ward TD, Sinn Féin’s spokesperson for Community Safety, had also called for urgent action against organised criminal gangs. These are serious concerns, and families threatened by drug criminals deserve protection.

But there is another side to the political debate that the public should know about.
In June 2026, an Oireachtas committee recommended removing criminal penalties for possession of ALL illegal drugs for personal use; not just cannabis, but also cocaine and heroin.
Several political parties welcomed these recommendations.

Among the politicians publicly supporting a move towards decriminalisation are:

Ann Graves TD – Sinn Féin: Defended the Oireachtas committee’s recommendations and criticised Government resistance to a comprehensive health-led approach.
Gary Gannon TD – Social Democrats: Chaired the Oireachtas Drugs Committee and explicitly advocated decriminalising possession for personal use.
Holly Cairns TD – Social Democrats: Challenged the Taoiseach over implementing the committee’s recommendations.
Ivana Bacik TD -Labour Party: Called for urgent implementation of the committee’s proposals.
Marie Sherlock TD – Labour Party: Served on the committee and supported its work and recommendations.
Roderic O’Gorman TD – Green Party: Called on the Government to act on the committee’s recommendations.

Indeed the parties that welcomed the June report included Sinn Féin, Labour, the Social Democrats and the Green Party.

As already stated, Sinn Féin and other opposition parties are demanding urgent Government action against criminal gangs terrorising innocent families over unpaid drug debts. Yet these same parties have welcomed proposals to decriminalise possession of illegal drugs for personal use, including cocaine and heroin. But would decriminalisation stop these gangs threatening families?
The answer is that there is no evidence it would, on its own. Drug dealing would remain illegal, criminal gangs could continue controlling supply, and drug debts could still be enforced through threats and violence. Indeed, this very concern was raised before an Oireachtas committee in October 2024.
With 1,027 cases of drug-related intimidation recorded during 2024 and 2025, Sinn Féin and every party advocating decriminalisation should explain precisely how their proposals would protect innocent families and weaken the criminal gangs responsible. The public deserves answers, not just political promises.

It is important to be accurate: Decriminalising possession does not mean legalising drug dealing, trafficking or intimidation. Those advocating reform argue that addiction should be addressed through healthcare rather than criminal punishment.

Nevertheless, there are legitimate questions for every political party advocating these changes.

  1. Would removing criminal penalties for personal possession reduce the power of drug gangs – or could it have unintended consequences?
  2. What safeguards would protect communities against drug dealing, recruitment of young people, addiction and drug-related intimidation?
  3. How would these proposals affect the demand that sustains the illegal drugs market?

Justice Minister Mr Jim O’Callaghan of Fianna Fáil has rejected the proposal to decriminalise possession of all drugs, while supporting today’s Sinn Féin motion against drug-debt intimidation.
The Government and Opposition must both explain how their policies would reduce the harm caused by illegal drugs.
The public deserves clear answers, consistent policies and effective protection for families living in fear.
Drug-debt intimidation, organised crime, addiction and the consequences of changing our drug laws must all be part of an open and informed national debate.

What do you think? Should possession of cocaine, heroin and other illegal drugs for personal use remain a criminal offence in Ireland?

Major Listeria monocytogenes Food Products Alert.

Recall of several Supervalu and Inspired By Centra Smoked Salmon, Mackerel and Prawn Cocktail products due to the presence of Listeria monocytogenes

Alert Summary dated Tuesday, 20th October 2026.

Category 1: For Action.
Alert Notification: 2026.67.
Product Identification: Please see table below.
Batch Code: All use-by dates.
Country Of Origin: Ireland
.

Message: The below identified Centra and Supervalu Smoked Salmon, Mackerel and Prawn Cocktail products are being recalled due to the presence of Listeria monocytogenes. Recall notices will be displayed at point-of-sale.

Product Names. Pack sizes.
Supervalu Smoked Salmon. 300g.
Supervalu Smoked Salmon.150g.
Supervalu Smoked Salmon.100g.
Supervalu Smoked Salmon. 40g.
Supervalu BBQ Salmon. 100g.
Supervalu Whiskey Smoked Salmon. 100g.
Supervalu Organic Smoked Salmon. 100g.
Signature Applewood Smoked Salmon. 300g.
Signature Applewood Smoked Salmon. 100g.
Supervalu Peppered Oak Roasted Salmon Darnes. 185g.
Signature Dingle Gin Infused Smoked Salmon. 100g.
Signature Tastes Smoked Salmon Ribbons. 80g.
Signature Tastes Organic Smoked Salmon. 250g.
Signature Tastes Dill & Black Pepper Smoked Salmon. 100g.
Signature Atlantic Prawn Cocktail. 180g.
Supervalu Prawn Cocktail. 180g.
Supervalu Smoked Peppered Mackerel. 160g.
Centra BBQ Salmon. 100g.
Centra Smoked Salmon. 100g.
Inspired Applewood Smoked Salmon. 80g.
Inspired Atlantic Prawn Cocktail. 180g.

Nature Of Danger: In healthy people, symptoms of Listeria monocytogenes infection can include mild flu-like symptoms, or gastrointestinal symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, and diarrhoea. However, in people who are more vulnerable, the infection can be severe and can lead to serious complications. People who are more vulnerable to Listeria monocytogenes infections include pregnant women, infants, older adults, and people with weakened immune systems. The incubation period, the time between initial infection and first symptoms appearing, is on average 3 weeks but can range between 3 and 70 days.

Action Required: Manufacturers, Wholesalers, Distributors, Caterers and Retailers:

Retailers: are requested to remove the implicated batches from sale and display recall notices at point-of-sale.

Wholesalers/Distributors: are requested to contact their affected customers and recall the implicated batches and provide a point-of-sale recall notice to their retailer customers.

Consumers: Consumers are advised not to eat the implicated batches.