Pre-deceased by his parents Gerry and Mary; Mr Ryan passed away peacefully surrounded by his loving family, while in the care of staff at Manor Nursing Home, Nenagh, North Co. Tipperary .
His passing is most deeply regretted, sadly missed and lovingly remembered by his sorrowing family; loving sister Bernie (Moroney), brothers John, Jer and Tim, brother-in-law Donie, sister-in-law Eileen, nieces Antoinette, Bernadette and Clodagh, nephews Barry, Greg and Seán, grandniece Ciara, grandnephews Michael, Seán and Cian, also regretted by William, Luiza and Algis, cousins, extended relatives, good neighbours and a wide circle of friends.
Requiescat in Pace.
Funeral Arrangements.
The earthly remains of Mr Ryan will repose at Tierney’s Funeral Home, Roscrea, on Saturday afternoon from 5.00pm until 7.00pm same evening. His remains will be received in the Church of St Cronan, Roscrea,on Sunday afternoon at 12:30pm to further repose for Funeral Mass at 1:00pm, followed by interment immediately afterwards in the adjoining new graveyard.
For those persons who would wish to attend Requiem Mass for Mr Ryan, but for reasons cannot, same can be viewed streamed live online, HERE.
The extended Crowe family wish to express their appreciation for your understanding at this difficult time, and have made arrangements for those persons wishing to send messages of condolence, to use the link shown HERE.
“The family of Mr Ryan would like to thank the staff of Manor Nursing Home, Nenagh, for the excellent care and attention that was afforded and received by the deceased.”
Minister for Rural and Community Development and the Gaeltacht, Mr Dara Calleary TD, will visit Tipperary and Clare on Friday, 24 July, for a full programme highlighting newly completed community, recreational and biodiversity projects.
The Minister’s visit begins at 9:00am with the official opening of Thurles Market Quarter, Town Parks, Thurles. He will then open Loughtagalla Biodiversity Play Park, Thurles at 10.30am, followed by Carrig Community Park, Carrig, Co. Tipperary, at 11.50am.
At 12.35pm, Minister Calleary will travel to Lorrha to view the renovated St Ruadhan’s Hall and visit the SCEAL Community Shop and Café, two facilities supporting local services and community life.
The afternoon programme moves to County Clare, beginning in Bunratty at 3.15pm, where the Minister will launch a new boat for Bunratty Search and Rescue Service.At 5.15pm, he will officially open the upgraded Lahinch Playground and launch the Clare Outdoor Recreation Plan on the town’s promenade. The day will conclude at 6.45pm with the opening of Corofin Community Centre.
This series of engagements will recognise the work of local volunteers, community organisations and public bodies involved in bringing the projects to completion.
Together, the developments provide improved parks, play areas, rescue resources, meeting spaces and community services for residents and visitors. They also demonstrate the important role locally led projects can play in strengthening rural towns and villages, supporting wellbeing, protecting biodiversity and creating welcoming public spaces for people of all ages.
One Council Restores History While Another Erases It – The Loss of Thurles’s Famine Double Ditch.
The decision by Dún Laoghaire-Rathdown County Council to spend approximately €660,000plus VAT restoring a historic ha-ha wall in Marlay Park (latter a sunken landscape boundary that uses a hidden trench and a vertical retaining wall), has understandably generated debate. The 197-metre structure, believed to date from the early nineteenth century, was designed to separate landscaped gardens from grazing animals without interrupting views across the estate. Much of its original locally sourced granite survived beneath vegetation, but the wall had fallen into disrepair. Restoration required specialist conservation work, dismantling and rebuilding sections of dry-stone wall, repairing the ditch and incorporating drainage infrastructure. The original contract was valued at €625,398 excluding VAT, with the final estimate rising to €660,374 following delays, unsuitable ground material, severe weather and difficulties obtaining appropriate stone.
Local construction professionals and taxpayers are entitled to question whether that represents value for money. Public bodies must explain how costs are calculated, why projects exceed their initial budgets and whether procurement arrangements adequately protect the public purse. Dún Laoghaire-Rathdown County Council has already faced criticism over the €753,528 cost of works at an entrance to Deerpark in Mount Merrion. That project is frequently described as the construction of “14 steps”, although the council says it also included a wheelchair-accessible ramp, retaining walls, granite paving, seating, landscaping, pedestrian crossings, road resurfacing, drainage, traffic-signal equipment and other public-realm works. The criticism of these costs is legitimate. Nevertheless, one important fact should not be forgotten: Dún Laoghaire-Rathdown County Council recognised that an historic structure was worth preserving.
That approach stands in painful contrast to what happened in Thurles.
The Thurles Great Famine Double Ditch was regarded locally as a rare surviving famine-era landscape feature. Local historical accounts date its construction accurately to 1846 and associate it with relief work provided to men and boys during the Great Famine. Rather than representing the landscaped elegance of a wealthy Dublin estate, this Double Ditch recalled hunger, poverty and the desperate struggle of local families to survive. It was not simply an old embankment. It was a physical connection with one of the darkest periods in Irish history. For generations, the route was also described locally as a public walkway and Mass path. Campaigners argued that it formed part of the social history of Thurles and should have been incorporated into a protected heritage trail.
Despite repeated warnings, the entire section of the Double Ditch was cleared in March 2022 supported by local councillors, as part of works connected with as yet a non existent, only proposed Thurles inner relief road. Contemporary photographs and local reporting showed mature vegetation being removed and the historic landscape feature being levelled by machinery.
Historic Thurles Double Ditch Eradicated in 2022. Pic. G.Willoughby.
Once such a structure is destroyed, it cannot truly be recreated. A replica might reproduce its approximate appearance, but it cannot restore the original stones, soil, boundaries and physical connection with the people who constructed it during the Great Famine.
This is the real loss suffered by Thurles. Tipperary County Council regularly speaks about protecting heritage and connecting communities with their past. Yet the treatment of the Double Ditch demonstrates the gulf that can exist between heritage policies and decisions taken on the ground. Roads and development are necessary, but heritage protection does not require a complete rejection of progress. It requires imagination, consultation and a willingness to examine alternative designs before destruction becomes inevitable.
The contrast between the two councils is striking. In Dublin, hundreds of thousands of euro are being spent restoring an aristocratic landscape feature. In Thurles, a structure associated with ordinary people surviving the Great Famine was treated as totally expendable. The Marlay Park bill deserves detailed scrutiny. So does every major publicly funded project. But the principle of conserving historic structures should be welcomed.
Led by the denials of elected councillors; mainly Mr Michaél Lowry (Non Party), Mr Sean Ryan (FF) and Mr Seamus Hanafin (FF), together with senior council officials, through wilful ignorance, self-deception, blind persistence and despite knowing better oversaw this reckless destruction. Thus the tragedy in Thurles is that the debate never reached the question of restoration costs.
The Double Ditch was not protected long enough for restoration to become an option. Dún Laoghaire–Rathdown County Council may reasonably be criticised for excessive costs. Tipperary County Council should be criticised for allowing irreplaceable local history to be destroyed.
One council appears willing to spend too much preserving history. The other did too little before all of that history was totally eradicated and lost forever.
Neither approach represents good stewardship of public money or public heritage, and the waste continues without the consent of the Irish taxpayer.
A striking new bronze artwork planned and in place at the entrance to FBD Semple Stadium in Thurles; celebrating Tipperary’s unique place in the history of Gaelic games.
The permanent public artwork was commissioned by Tipperary County Council in partnership with Tipperary GAA and the management of FBD Semple Stadium. It is installed near the stadium entrance, and expected to create a new landmark for supporters, visitors and the wider Thurles community.
Set to be unveiled; artwork celebrating Thurles as birthplace of the GAA. Pic: G. Willoughby.
Rather than honouring one individual player or official, we understand the sculpture is intended to represent Gaelic games more broadly. The original commission sought a bronze design featuring male and female sporting figures, reflecting the traditions of hurling, camogie, Gaelic football and ladies’ football.
The location is particularly significant. The Gaelic Athletic Association was founded in Hayes’ Hotel, Thurles, on November 1st 1884, while the Ladies Gaelic Football Association was also established in the town in 1974. The artwork will therefore recognise Thurles not only as one of Ireland’s great sporting towns, but as the birthplace of organisations that have shaped Irish community life for generations.
Semple Stadium itself has played a central role in that history. It is the home of Tipperary hurling and football and one of the country’s most famous GAA venues. The stadium was named after Mr Tom Semple in 1971 and hosted the historic 1984 All-Ireland Hurling Final, during the GAA’s centenary celebrations.
Full public details of the completed sculpture, including the selected artist and the formal unveiling arrangements, have not yet been clearly published on the council’s official project page.
When unveiled, the new bronze tribute should provide a lasting reminder of Thurles’ proud contribution to Ireland’s national games.
Where else in Ireland would a crossroads, latter situated on a blind hill, be allowed to have traffic approaching and exiting at 100 km/h?
Well this remains the case at Turtulla Cross, Thurles, Co. Tipperary. The proposed replacement of Turtulla Cross with a roundabout has been welcomed by local councillors as a major step forward. Nobody disputes that this junction has a serious safety problem. It has been associated with one pedestrian fatality, numerous collisions and long-standing concern among residents, motorists and public representatives.
Turtulla Cross, Thurles, Co. Tipperary, showing blind hill, which, despite previous TII intervention, remains flooded for 10 months of the year. Pic: G. Willoughby.
The present 100 km/h limit is a maximum permitted speed, not an instruction to drive at that speed. Nevertheless, allowing traffic to approach a known hazardous junction under a 100 km/h limit sends entirely the wrong message. Drivers travelling at or near that speed have less time to recognise danger, react to another vehicle and stop safely.
However, welcoming action should not mean giving Transport Infrastructure Ireland and Tipperary County Council a blank cheque. Before large sums of public money are committed to constructing a roundabout, the authorities must explain why a significantly cheaper and quicker safety measure has not been properly trialled; namely reducing the speed limit on the approach and exit to Turtulla Cross from 100 km/h to 50 or 60 km/h.
A roundabout would inevitably force approaching vehicles to slow considerably. That raises an obvious question: why not introduce lower approach speeds now and assess the results before committing to an expensive construction project?
The Government’s own Speed Limit Review recommended lower limits, including a proposed reduction of the default limit on national secondary roads from 100 km/h to 80 km/h. Official guidance also recognises 60 km/h transition zones on national and other significant roads entering areas where traffic conditions become more complex.
A properly designed trial could include a 60 km/h transition zone, a further 50 km/h limit immediately approaching the junction, prominent warning signs, refreshed road markings, flashing speed indicators, improved lighting and targeted Garda enforcement. The trial should be supported by speed surveys and collision-risk assessments, with the results published openly. A few hundred metres closer to Thurles town such signs exist, so just grab a screwdriver or pliers and move them.
According to Tipperary County Council’s May 2026 management report, preliminary design has commenced for a safety scheme involving a roundabout. The project is expected to enter the Part 8 planning process in 2026, with construction anticipated in 2027, or 2028 or maybe 2030.
That timetable provides an opportunity to test lower-cost interventions before construction begins. Public money must be treated with respect. A roundabout may ultimately prove necessary, particularly if the junction’s layout, visibility or traffic movements cannot be made acceptably safe through speed management alone. But that conclusion should be demonstrated through real evidence, not just simply assumed by councillors wishing to take advantage of a video opportunity.
TII and Tipperary County Council should publish the up-to-date collision history, traffic speeds, projected construction cost, alternatives considered and the reasons those alternatives were rejected.
Spending millions without first testing an enforceable speed reduction would be a failure of common sense and responsible public administration. Safety must come first, but value for money, transparency and evidence must come with it.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish.AcceptRead More
Privacy & Cookies Policy
Privacy Overview
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
Recent Comments