The unfolding controversy surrounding Liberty Recycling, a Dublin-based charity chaired by Sinn Féin TD Mr Aengus Ó Snodaigh, raises even more troubling questions about financial oversight, corporate governance and the protection of public funds. What began as a Garda investigation into suspected money laundering has developed into a major examination of how a charitable organisation, established to provide employment and training opportunities for people affected by drug addiction, was managed and supervised.
According to evidence presented to the High Court, investigators are examining substantial international financial transfers through the charity’s bank accounts that appeared inconsistent with its normal activities. Gardaí have seized luxury vehicles and other high-value goods, including BMW X5s, Rolex watches and designer handbags, with assets valued at approximately €300,000. The investigation has also raised questions about the purchase of other expensive vehicles, including a Porsche, and the establishment of separate commercial entities associated with the charity.
Particularly concerning are the findings presented by the Charities Regulator, which alleged that there was little or no effective management or oversight of the charity’s activities by its trustees and directors. The regulator also raised concerns that the charity’s operations, assets and financial arrangements had become intertwined with those of separate companies that were not registered charities.
A further complication concerns a letter submitted in connection with the establishment of one of those companies, Liberty Developments. The document bore a signature attributed to Mr Aengus Ó Snodaigh, who disputes its authenticity and maintains that he neither signed it nor authorised anyone else to sign on his behalf. The authenticity of that signature remains unresolved and is a matter requiring independent examination.
It is important to emphasise that there is no evidence presented to date that Mr Ó Snodaigh or the other charity trustees were involved in, or aware of, the suspected criminal activity. Mr Ó Snodaigh is not personally under criminal investigation. However, the absence of evidence of criminal involvement does not remove the wider questions surrounding the responsibilities of those entrusted with overseeing charitable organisations.
Charity trustees have a duty to safeguard assets, ensure proper financial controls, understand the organisations operating under their supervision and protect the purposes for which charitable funds are provided. These responsibilities become particularly important where public funding is involved.
Liberty Recycling reportedly received more than €2 million in State funding in recent years through employment-related programmes. Its financial difficulties and subsequent closure have placed approximately 100 jobs and training opportunities at risk.
The High Court has appointed provisional liquidators following an application by the Charities Regulator, placing the charity’s affairs under independent control. Beyond the financial investigation, there is a genuine human cost. Workers, trainees and vulnerable individuals who depended on the organisation now face uncertainty about their futures. The central issue is not simply whether criminal wrongdoing occurred. It is also whether the systems designed to prevent financial misconduct, protect charitable assets and ensure accountability were sufficiently robust.
There are legitimate questions that deserve answers. How were substantial international financial transactions monitored? What oversight existed over the creation of associated commercial companies? How were major vehicle purchases authorised? What safeguards protected public funding? And how could a document bearing a disputed signature enter the corporate record? These questions must be answered through proper investigation, independent scrutiny and established legal processes, without prejudging anyone’s guilt.
The Liberty Recycling controversy should also prompt a broader examination of charity regulation in Ireland. Public confidence in the charitable sector depends on transparency, effective oversight and the responsible management of money donated or provided for the public good. Thousands of legitimate charities carry out invaluable work across the country. Their reputations should not be undermined by weaknesses in the governance of individual organisations. Accountability is not an accusation of criminal guilt. It is a fundamental responsibility of anyone entrusted with managing charitable resources, particularly where public money and vulnerable communities are involved.
The priority must now be to establish the full facts, protect those affected and ensure that appropriate lessons are learned. The public deserves nothing less.
Ireland is encouraging motorists to switch to electric vehicles, but the rising cost of public charging is now threatening one of the biggest reasons for making that switch; saving money. A press report published on November 4th 2026 highlights a serious concern. Charging an electric vehicle at some public charging stations can now cost MORE per kilometre than driving a petrol or diesel car. And this is not just a problem with expensive motorway rapid chargers. Both SLOW public charging and FAST public charging are becoming increasingly expensive.
The Latest Confirmed Esb Charging Prices Following the latest ESB price increases on November 2nd 2026: Slow / Standard Public Charging (Ac) – Pay-as-you-go: 70 cent per kWh. Contactless payment: 72 cent per kWh. Generally used for kerbside, town and neighbourhood charging. Fast / Rapid Public Charging (Dc) – Pay-as-you-go: 83 cent per kWh. Contactless payment: 85 cent per kWh. Typically used at motorway service stations and rapid charging hubs. Home Charging – Can cost as little as 12 cent per kWh on certain discounted night-time tariffs.
Think about that for a moment. A motorist using an ESB rapid public charger and paying by contactless card can now pay more than SEVEN TIMES the electricity rate available to someone charging at home for 12 cent per kWh. Even using a slower public charger at 70 cent per kWh costs nearly SIX TIMES that cheap home rate.
How Does This Compare With Diesel? Electric family car using expensive public rapid charging – Almost €70 for approximately 450 km of winter driving. Family diesel car – Approximately €110 for around 950 km. That works out at: Electric vehicle: €15.56 per 100 km. Diesel vehicle: €11.58 per 100 km. In this particular comparison, the electric vehicle costs approximately 34% MORE per kilometre than your diesel car. These are illustrative vehicle and charging costs, not a claim that every electric car is more expensive than every diesel car.
The Real Problem Is Fairness People with private driveways and access to cheaper home electricity can still make substantial savings by driving electric vehicles. But what about motorists living in: Apartments? Terraced houses without driveways? Homes without private parking? Areas where home charging simply isn’t possible? These motorists may have little choice but to depend on public charging. They are effectively being charged substantially more simply because they cannot install a charger at home. And even when they choose slower public charging instead of rapid charging, the price can still be many times higher than charging at home.
More Chargers Alone Will Not Solve This Problem. The Government has announced its National EV Charging Infrastructure Strategy 2026–2028. More charging infrastructure is certainly needed. But what is the point of installing thousands of additional chargers if ordinary motorists cannot afford to use them? According to press reports, the Department of Transport currently has no plans to regulate public EV charging prices.
The latter raises an important question; who is protecting motorists from excessive public charging costs?
Ireland needs:
Affordable public charging, both slow and rapid.
Clear and transparent prices across all charging networks.
Fair charging options for apartment residents and households without driveways.
Greater competition and scrutiny of public charging tariffs.
A Government strategy that addresses the cost of charging, not simply the number of chargers installed.
The Bottom Line Electric vehicles are supposed to offer motorists a cleaner and more economical alternative to petrol and diesel. For people who can charge at home cheaply, that financial advantage often remains. But for motorists who depend entirely on public charging, the situation is becoming very different. Ireland cannot expect motorists to make the transition to electric vehicles, while allowing public charging to become more expensive than the petrol and diesel alternatives it is supposed to replace. A fair transition must work for everyone, not just homeowners with private driveways.
Ireland Doesn’t Just Need More Ev Chargers. It Needs Public Charging That Ordinary Motorists Can Afford. Do you think the Government should regulate public EV charging prices to protect motorists?
In her 91st year and pre-deceased by her husband Des, son-in-law Eamon Leahy, parents JP and Margaret Brady (Clonmel), and her ten siblings; Mrs Hanafin passed away peacefully at her place of ordinary residence.
Her passing is most deeply regretted, sadly missed and lovingly remembered by her sorrowing family; daughter Mary, son John, grandchildren MaryClaire, Darragh and John, brothers Oliver and Tony, sisters Celia and Anna, nieces and nephews (especially Sinéad), sisters-in-law, extended relatives, neighbours, friends and Padre Pio devotees everywhere.
Requiescat in Pace.
Funeral Arrangements.
The earthly remains of Mrs Hanafin will repose at Hugh Ryan’s Funeral Home, Slievenamon Road, Thurles, (Eircode E41 CP59), on Friday afternoon, November 6th from 5:00pm until 7:00pm, same evening. Her remains will be received into the nearby Cathedral of the Assumption, Cathedral Street, Thurles, (Eircode E41 A528),on Saturday morning November 7th, at 10:30am, to further repose for Requiem Mass at 11:00am, followed by interment, immediately afterwards, in St Patrick’s Cemetery, Moyne Road, Lognafulla, Thurles, Co. Tipperary.
For those persons who would wish to attend Requiem Mass for Mrs Hanafin, but for reasons cannot, same can be viewed streamed live online, HERE.
The extended Hanafin and Brady families wish to express their appreciation for your understanding at this difficult time, and have made arrangements for those persons wishing to send messages of condolence, to use the link shown HERE.
“It was a privilege that Mona lived out her life in her own home and we sincerely thank all those who made this possible.“
Government must urgently fund nature restoration as 90% of Ireland’s EU-protected habitats are in unfavourable condition, warns Climate Change Advisory Council.
Council criticises lack of dedicated funding for nature restoration in Budget 2027.
Restoring Ireland’s natural environment could deliver almost €33bn in socio-economic benefits by 2050 and strengthen protection against flooding, coastal erosion and other climate impacts.
Professor Yvonne Buckley
Publishing the Biodiversity chapter of its Annual Review 2026 today, the Climate Change Advisory Council has criticised the Government’s failure to commit adequate funding for nature restoration in Budget 2027. No specific allocations for nature restoration have been made through the Infrastructure, Climate and Nature Fund, despite the need to urgently reverse biodiversity loss and prepare Ireland for the growing impacts of climate change.
The latest conservation assessments show that 90% of Ireland’s EU-protected habitat types and 42% of protected species are in unfavourable conservation status, with the majority of protected habitat types continuing to decline.[1] Reversing this decline requires immediate action to tackle the pressures driving biodiversity loss, alongside sustained investment to restore habitats.
The Council says Ireland’s natural habitats must be recognised and invested in as critical natural infrastructure. Healthy wetlands and floodplains help absorb and store excess rainfall, while coastal dunes and saltmarshes provide natural defences against erosion, sea level rise, and storm surges. As these habitats deteriorate, communities lose protections that complement built flood and storm defences.
There is also a strong economic case for investment. Ireland’s draft National Restoration Plan estimates that ecosystem restoration and re-establishment could deliver €32.9 billion in socio-economic benefits between 2024 and 2050, against estimated costs of €5.8 billion. These benefits include reduced flood risks, improved water quality, increased carbon sequestration and healthier ecosystems.
Funding for the National Parks and Wildlife Service has increased in recent years, with €112 million allocated for 2027. While welcoming this investment, Ireland’s investment gap for biodiversity protection and restoration is estimated at €700 million per year and a dedicated, long-term funding programme to deliver the National Restoration Plan is urgently needed.
The Council is calling for multi-annual funding commitments, greater investment in nature-based measures and financial supports for farmers and landowners to restore and manage habitats. With more ecologists and conservation specialists currently needed to support existing work, restoration efforts would also support further skilled employment creation in rural Ireland.
Professor Yvonne Buckley, Member of the Climate Change Advisory Council, said: “Nine in ten of Ireland’s EU-protected habitat types are in unfavourable condition. We know how serious the problem is, yet we still haven’t committed the long-term funding needed to turn things around. There is a clear business case for this investment into biodiversity and nature restoration efforts. Without functioning and restored ecosystems, Ireland will suffer economically, ecologically and socially. The increase in funding for the National Parks and Wildlife Service is welcome but it is not enough. While we also welcome the commitment of €715 million to the Office for Public Works for flood-risk management between 2026 and 2030, we need to see the same level of ambition when it comes to restoring the wetlands, peatlands and coastal habitats that help protect communities across Ireland. Nature is critical infrastructure that helps us to achieve our climate mitigation and adaptation targets with many co-benefits. It is not an optional extra.”
In his 89th year, Dr White, sadly passed away peacefully while in the care of staff at Fennor Hill Care Facility, Urlingford, Co. Kilkenny.
The passing of Dr White is most deeply regretted, sadly missed and lovingly remembered by his sorrowing family; daughters Jess and Pippa, grandchildren Alex, Darcie and Riley, sister Dorothy, extended relatives, neighbours and a wide circle of friends.
If you would like to make a donation in Dr White’s memory, please consider a dementia research charity in memory of Dr. Norman Everett White, (19th March 1937 – 2nd November 2026).
Much loved father, grandfather, brother and uncle, raconteur, food gourmand, reader and thinker; Dr White greatly enjoyed life’s pleasures. Despite experiencing dementia towards the end of his life, he maintained his curiosity and humour. “Life death does end and each day dies with sleep.” – extract from “No worst, there is none”, (Sonnets of Desolation” 1885), by Victorian poet and Jesuit priest, Gerard Manley Hopkins.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish.AcceptRead More
Privacy & Cookies Policy
Privacy Overview
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
Recent Comments