Archives

Death Of Brigid Brennan, Formerly Of Thurles, Co. Tipperary

It was with great sadness that we learned of the death yesterday Wednesday 7th October 2026, of Mrs Brigid Brennan (née Quinlan), Marian Terrace, Clonmel, Co. Tipperary and formerly of Glastrigan, Borrisoleigh, Thurles, Co. Tipperary.

In her 102nd year and pre-deceased by her husband Richard (Dick) and their infant son Joseph; Mrs Brennan passed away peacefully, while in the care of staff at Bramleigh Lodge Nursing Home, Ballynastick, Co. Tipperary.

Her passing is most deeply regretted, sadly missed and lovingly remembered by her sorrowing family; loving sons and daughters Richard, Maureen (O’Mahony), Breda (Murphy), John, Leisha (Fahey), Joe, Paddy, Sadie (Tobin), Patricia (Moynihan), Jo, Annie and Bill, her 39 grandchildren, 45 great-grandchildren, sons-in-law, daughters-in-law, nieces, nephews, sisters-in-law, extended relatives, neighbours and friends.

Requiescat in Pace.

Funeral Arrangements.

The earthly remains of Mrs Brennan will repose at John O’Donoghue and Sons Funeral Home, Kickham Street, Clonmel, Co. Tipperary, (Eircode E91 PK19), on Friday afternoon, October 9th from 5:00pm until 7:00pm, same evening.
Her remains will be received into the Church of St Peter and St Paul, Gladstone Street, Clonmel, Co. Tipperary, (Eircode E91 YY01), on Saturday afternoon, October 10th, to further repose for Requiem Mass at 1:00pm, followed by interment, immediately afterwards, in St Patrick’s Cemetery, Moanmehill, Clonmel, Co. Tipperary.

For those persons who would wish to attend Requiem Mass for Mrs Brennan, but for reasons cannot, same can be viewed streamed live online, HERE.

The extended Brennan and Quinlan families wish to express their appreciation for your understanding at this difficult time, and have made arrangements for those persons wishing to send messages of condolence, to use the link shown HERE.

Budget 2027 – Ireland Announces €5.9 Billion Investment In Justice, Policing And Public Safety

Government increases justice funding by €400 million, with major investment in Garda recruitment, prison expansion, legal aid, youth justice and domestic violence services.

The Minister for Justice, Home Affairs and Migration, Mr Jim O’Callaghan, has announced a €5.9 billion allocation for Ireland’s justice sector under Budget 2027, representing an increase of more than €400 million compared with 2026.
The investment aims to strengthen frontline policing, improve public safety, expand prison capacity, enhance access to justice and support reforms within Ireland’s immigration system.
Current expenditure will increase by €363 million to €5.46 billion, while capital expenditure will rise by €40 million to €430 million.

€2.76 Billion for Gardaí and Crime Prevention
An Garda Síochána will receive €2.758 billion, an increase of €167 million, or 6.4%, to strengthen policing across the country.
The additional funding will support the recruitment of up to 1,000 new Gardaí in 2027, alongside the continued rollout of body-worn cameras, enhanced training, cybersecurity and intelligence capabilities.
The Criminal Assets Bureau will also receive an additional €1.9 million, bringing its total allocation to €15.7 million.

€686 Million to Expand Prison Capacity
The Irish Prison Service will receive €686 million, an increase of €106 million, or 18%, compared with 2026.
The prison capital budget will rise by approximately 40% to €95 million, supporting the Government’s commitment to delivering 1,500 additional prison spaces by 2031.
Major projects include expansions at Midlands Prison, Castlerea, Cloverhill and Dóchas.
The funding will also support the recruitment of more than 200 prison officers, improvements in training and digital infrastructure, and the introduction of electronic monitoring for certain prisoners.
Investment in prisoner care and rehabilitation will increase by 22% to €66 million.

Major Investment in Legal Aid and Domestic Violence Services
Budget 2027 includes an additional €14.5 million to begin reforming the Civil Legal Aid Scheme, making legal assistance accessible to more people through expanded financial eligibility.
The Legal Aid Board will receive €74.6 million, while funding for Free Legal Advice Centres will increase by 67%.
Overall, more than €90 million has been secured for civil legal aid and access-to-justice initiatives, described as a historic investment.
Funding to combat domestic, sexual and gender-based violence will also increase by €5.3 million to €84.4 million.
The allocation will support Cuan and frontline organisations providing refuge accommodation, protection and assistance to victims and survivors.
The Courts Service will receive €228 million to support the administration of justice.

Migration Reforms to Deliver €682 Million in Savings
The Government expects to save €682 million in migration-related accommodation expenditure during 2027, representing a 38% reduction in the overall migration budget.
This includes €430 million in reduced accommodation costs for people from Ukraine receiving temporary protection and €252 million in savings within the International Protection Accommodation System.
The reductions are linked to accommodation reforms, improved financial oversight and implementation of the EU Migration and Asylum Pact.
Additional staffing resources will support faster processing of immigration, visa and international protection applications.
Funding for immigration enforcement measures will also increase by €2 million, or 27%.

Increased Support for Youth Justice and Rehabilitation
Youth justice initiatives will receive an additional €11.5 million, bringing total funding to almost €50 million.
The investment will strengthen Youth Diversion Programmes, helping young people avoid criminal activity through early intervention and community-based support.

Other allocations include an additional €2.9 million for the Probation Service, €3.6 million for the Data Protection Commission and €3.2 million in current funding for Forensic Science Ireland.

Government Prioritises Safer Communities
The Government is committed to reducing crime, strengthening public safety, improving access to justice and confronting domestic, sexual and gender-based violence.
Mr Jim O’Callaghan highlighted Garda recruitment, prison expansion, modernised policing and immigration reform as central priorities.

The €5.9 billion investment represents a significant commitment to Ireland’s justice system, with its success depending on effective implementation, frontline recruitment and the timely delivery of planned reforms and infrastructure projects.

Charles Stewart Parnell, Ivy Day And A Tradition Thurles Has Almost Forgotten

Charles Stewart Parnell, (1846 – 1891).

How many men and women in Tipperary were spotted, on Tuesday last, wearing an ivy leaf in their lapel?

October 6th this year was Budget Day, yet amid the political grandstanding, as opposition politicians appeared more concerned with having their snouts in the trough and criticising a democratically elected government, few, if any, spared a thought for the anniversary of the death of one of Ireland’s greatest patriots, Charles Stewart Parnell.

It was on October 6th, 1891, exactly 135 years ago, that Parnell passed away. His extraordinary contribution to Ireland’s struggle for self-government helped lay the foundations for the independent, prosperous nation we enjoy today; a country that now ranks among the wealthiest in the world.

Surely, on such a significant anniversary, this remarkable Irishman deserved more than to be forgotten amid the political point-scoring of Budget Day.

On October 6th 1891, Charles Stewart Parnell an Irish nationalist politician, died in Brighton, England, aged only 45. Ireland had lost the man remembered for generations as its “Uncrowned King.” Though an Anglican, his funeral on October 11th was at the Irish National non-denominational Glasnevin Cemetery in Dublin, and was attended by more than 200,000 people. His notability was such that his gravestone of unhewn Wicklow granite, erected in 1940, reads only “Parnell”.

Born at Avondale, Co. Wicklow, in 1846, Parnell came from a Protestant landowning family, yet became one of the most powerful leaders of Irish nationalism in the nineteenth century. He transformed the Irish Parliamentary Party into a disciplined political force at Westminster, supported the campaign for tenant farmers during the Land War and brought the demand for Home Rule to the very centre of British politics.
His political career ended in tragedy. Following the public revelation of his long relationship with Mrs Katharine O’Shea during divorce proceedings in 1890, the Irish Parliamentary Party split bitterly. Parnell refused to surrender his leadership and continued campaigning throughout Ireland and Britain, while his health rapidly deteriorated.

But Thurles has its own important place in the Parnell story. In January 1885, Parnell travelled personally to Thurles during a dispute over the selection of a parliamentary candidate for Tipperary. Contemporary accounts record that he attended a Home Rule convention in the town and successfully pressed local supporters to accept his preferred candidate, Mr John O’Connor ♦. It was an extraordinary demonstration of the authority Parnell then exercised over the Irish nationalist movement.

♦ In January 1885, Parnell travelled personally to Thurles town to resolve a dispute over the selection of a parliamentary candidate for Tipperary. His preferred candidate was Mr John O’Connor, a Cork-born Fenian, prominent Land League activist and devoted supporter of the Home Rule movement. Local nationalists, however, favoured their own candidate, Mr John O’Ryan, (who previously had been imprisoned as a political suspect, demonstrating that he too had made sacrifices for the nationalist cause). Such was Parnell’s extraordinary authority that his intervention secured O’Ryan’s withdrawal and O’Connor’s unanimous selection.
O’Connor subsequently entered Parliament unopposed and remained steadfastly loyal to Parnell, even during the bitter party split of 1890. This historic visit to Thurles stands as a powerful reminder of Parnell’s commanding influence and his determination to unite Irish nationalism in pursuit of self-government.

His name remains part of the everyday geography of Thurles. Parnell Street (Formerly New Street), still runs through the town today, its name appearing in current Tipperary County Council records. It is perhaps easy to pass along that street without stopping to consider the man whose name it carries or why an earlier generation considered his memory important enough to preserve in the streetscape of Thurles.

The Grave of Charles Stewart Parnell, Glasnevin Cemetery, Dublin.

In the Ireland of our great-grandparents, wearing a sprig of ivy, on October 6th, carried a meaning immediately understood by others. It represented remembrance, loyalty and continuing devotion to Parnell and to the political hopes associated with him.
James Joyce later preserved that fading world in his famous short story Ivy Day in the Committee Room.

The tradition survives, but seemingly not in Thurles Co. Tipperary and numerous other places in our green land. However, remarkably, Ivy Day has not disappeared altogether. Only this week, marking the 135th anniversary of Parnell’s death, the Parnell Society held its annual commemoration. On Saturday, October 3rd 2026, historians and supporters gathered at Parnell’s ancestral home at Avondale, County Wicklow, for an Ivy Day symposium, examining his political legacy, his involvement in industry, landlord and tenant relations and the Irish Parliamentary Party.
The following day, Sunday, October 4th, people again gathered around Parnell’s grave at Glasnevin Cemetery. A wreath was laid and Ms Claire Hanna MP, leader of the SDLP, delivered the annual Ivy Day oration. The ceremony continues a commemorative tradition which began on the first anniversary of Parnell’s death and is now held on the Sunday nearest October 6th each year.
What is striking from a Thurles perspective, however, is how completely the old custom appears to have slipped from local public memory.

The Ivy Leaf and the “Dead Chief”.
When Parnell was buried at Glasnevin Cemetery in October 1891, his funeral drew an enormous crowd. In the years that followed, October 6th became known as “Ivy Day”.
The ivy leaf became the emblem of remembrance for Parnell. Accounts of the tradition tell how mourners took ivy from the walls of Glasnevin cemetery and wore it in their lapels, while another possible origin lies in an ivy wreath placed beside his remains. What is certain is that within a year of his death the ivy leaf had become firmly associated with those who remained loyal to his memory.

Despite Parnell’s documented visit to Thurles, despite a prominent street in the town still bearing his name, and despite the national Ivy Day tradition continuing in 2026, I can find no publicly advertised Ivy Day commemoration in Thurles this year and no obvious continuation locally of the old custom of wearing the ivy leaf on October 6th.
That does not prove that no individual in Thurles remembered Parnell privately. But as a visible civic tradition, the wearing of the ivy appears to have disappeared from the town. Perhaps that is worth reflecting upon.
There must once have been men and women walking the streets of Thurles on an October morning with a little piece of green ivy pinned to a coat or jacket. To their neighbours, no explanation would have been necessary.

The leaf says simply, Parnell is remembered. Today thousands of us travel along Parnell Street, Thurles, yet comparatively few may know why the street bears that name, that Parnell himself once came to the town, or that for generations October 6th was a special day of remembrance throughout Ireland.
Parnell was neither a saint nor a man without controversy. His political career ended amid one of the bitterest divisions Ireland had known. But his historical importance remains beyond dispute.
He helped give Irish nationalism political discipline and parliamentary power. He stood at the centre of the struggle that transformed the position of Ireland’s tenant farmers. And he brought the possibility of Irish self-government closer than it had been for generations.
When he died, his followers chose a remarkably humble memorial. Not a flag. Not a medal. Not an elaborate badge. Just a small leaf of ivy, evergreen, clinging firmly through winter, and difficult to uproot.
One hundred and thirty-five years later, a few people still gather at Glasnevin to remember the “Dead Chief”.
Perhaps Thurles, a town which still carries his name on one of its streets and which once witnessed Parnell himself exercising his formidable political authority, might consider remembering ‘Ivy Day’ next year.

Perhaps next Sunday October 11th, the anniversary of Charles Stewart Parnell’s burial in 1891, we might all, including the landowning families of Ireland, pause to remember his extraordinary contribution to our nation. Let each of us pluck a sprig of ivy from the hedgerow and wear it proudly in our lapel or buttonhole, reviving a tradition of remembrance as a simple yet meaningful gesture of gratitude and respect for a man to whom Ireland owes so much.

A small sprig of ivy on October 11th would cost almost nothing. But it might remind another generation why Parnell Street is called Parnell Street and of the remarkable, complicated man who helped change the course of Irish history.

Death Of Kitty Ryan, Formerly Of Thurles, Co. Tipperary.

It was with great sadness that we learned of the death today Wednesday 7th October 2026, of Mrs Catherine (Kitty) Ryan (née Dunne) Green Street, Callan, Co. Kilkenny and formerly of Lacken, Drombane, Thurles, Co. Tipperary.

In her 100th year and pre-deceased by her husband Pat and her brother Jerry; Mrs Ryan passed away peacefully, surrounded by her loving family, while in the care of staff at The Residence Nursing Home, Bohernatounish Road Roundabout, Loughboy, Co. Kilkenny.

Her passing is most deeply regretted, sadly missed and lovingly remembered by her sorrowing family; loving daughter Norah (Keogh), sons Tom, EJ, Gerard (Bishopstown) and Dermot (Kiltoom), son-in-law Kevin, daughters-in-law Phil, Alma, Irene and Helen, grandchildren, great grandchildren, sister Mollie (Bourke), sister-in-law Eileen (Dunne), nieces, nephews, extended relatives, neighbours and many friends.

Requiescat in Pace.

Funeral Arrangements.

The earthly remains of Mrs Ryan will repose at Molloy’s Funeral Home, Callan. Co. Kilkenny, (Eircode R95 Y443), on Friday afternoon, October 9th 2026, from 5:00pm with Rosary and Vigil Prayers at 7:00pm, before being received into the nearby Church of the Assumption, Callan, Co. Kilkenny, (Eircode R95 VK82), same evening.

Requiem Mass for Mrs Ryan will be offered on Saturday morning, October 10th, at 11:00am, followed by interment, immediately afterwards in Kilbride Cemetery, Callan, Co. Kilkenny.

For those persons who would wish to attend Requiem Mass for Mrs Ryan, but for reasons cannot, same can be viewed streamed live online, HERE.

The extended Ryan and Dunne families wish to express their appreciation for your understanding at this difficult time, and have made arrangements for those persons wishing to send messages of condolence, to use the link shown HERE.

Note Please: House Strictly Private.

RTÉ Funding – Is The Irish Government Right To Ask Where The Money Is Going?

The Irish Government has decided that RTÉ will receive €240 million in public funding in 2027 instead of the €260 million previously promised.

That statement raises two important questions:
Is the Government justified in holding back the extra €20 million? And has RTÉ delivered the reforms it promised in return for such substantial public funding?

RTÉ Director General Mr Kevin Bakhurst strongly disagrees with the Government’s decision. He says RTÉ planned its future on the basis of a three-year Government funding commitment and that changing the figure at this late stage will affect its five-year strategy.
And he has a point. But taxpayers are also entitled to look at what RTÉ promised to deliver in return.
What happened to the promised staff reductions?
One of RTÉ’s major reform commitments was to become a smaller and more efficient organisation. RTÉ’s strategy proposed reducing its workforce by up to 400 positions, roughly 20% of its workforce, over the five-year transformation programme.
Its 2025 Voluntary Exit Programme was therefore an important first test.
RTÉ received 325 applications from staff wishing to leave, and RTÉ itself said its target for 2025 was “over 100” exits under the voluntary scheme.
What actually happened? Only 67 employees left through the Voluntary Exit Programme in 2025.
RTÉ also abolished or “suppressed” another 30 posts, giving a headline figure of 97 positions removed.

But there is an important distinction. Sixty seven people actually left through the redundancy programme. The additional 30 were posts removed following other departures or organisational changes.
Therefore, against RTÉ’s own stated target of more than 100 voluntary exits in 2025, only 67 were achieved. That means the actual redundancy programme delivered roughly two-thirds of its first-year target. And RTÉ still has a very considerable distance to travel if it is to achieve its overall ambition of reducing staff numbers by up to 400.

RTÉ’s own internal review subsequently acknowledged that the voluntary exit scheme failed to produce departures on the scale required. It found that the criteria were restrictive, the application period was too short and that, if the experience were repeated, RTÉ might have to make around 500 offers to achieve 300 exits. That surely strengthens the Government’s argument that the promised transformation has not progressed as quickly as expected.

What about RTÉ’s €22.5 million surplus?

RTÉ reported a €22.5 million surplus for 2025. At first glance that produces an obvious question: Why does an organisation reporting a €22.5m surplus need another €20m from Government? The answer is more complicated.
RTÉ says some planned expenditure was postponed into 2026 and that part of the surplus arose from accounting adjustments rather than cash sitting unused.
It also says €9.6 million resulted from the release of accounting provisions and accruals, so that portion should not simply be regarded as spare cash.

Nevertheless, taxpayers are entitled to ask:

  • Exactly which projects were postponed?
  • How much did each project cost?
  • How much of the €22.5m surplus represented genuine underspending?
  • And why isn’t that information presented in a simple, easily understood breakdown?

RTÉ receives much more than €240 million overall.
There is another important point often overlooked in this debate. RTÉ does not operate on €240 million alone. In 2025 its total revenue was approximately €383.4 million. That included licence-fee income, additional Government funding and substantial commercial income from advertising and other activities.
So the €240m being discussed is RTÉ’s public-funding allocation, is not the broadcaster’s entire annual income.
RTÉ operates television channels, radio stations, news services, RTÉ Player, digital services, regional reporting, Irish-language broadcasting, sport, drama, entertainment, documentaries and cultural programming.
Nobody seriously suggests all of this can be provided for nothing. But when hundreds of millions of euro of public money are involved, the public is entitled to know exactly what it is buying.

Where is all the money going?
There should be a straightforward annual statement telling taxpayers:

  • How much goes on staff?
  • How much goes on management?
  • How much goes on television and radio programmes?
  • How much goes on sports rights?
  • How much goes to independent producers?
  • How much goes on buildings and property?
  • How much goes on technology?
  • How much has actually been saved?
  • And crucially, How many of the promised redundancies and staff reductions have actually happened?

The Government certainly has questions to answer.
It publicly committed itself to predictable multi-year funding and RTÉ understandably made plans on that basis, but RTÉ also made commitments. It promised a smaller, more agile organisation and proposed reducing staffing by up to 400 positions.
In the first major voluntary redundancy programme, RTÉ sought more than 100 exits. Despite receiving 325 applications, only 67 people ultimately departed under that scheme. That cannot reasonably be described as the level of progress originally envisaged. Public funding should come with public accountability. So perhaps the real question is not simply whether RTÉ should receive €240m or €260m.

It is this:
Before another €20 million of taxpayers’ money is handed over, shouldn’t RTÉ be required to show clearly how the money already provided has been spent, why its redundancy programme fell short of its own target, how it intends to achieve the promised reduction of up to 400 positions and exactly what measurable reforms the public/taxpayer is getting in return?