Archives

Tipperary County Council’s Response To EPA Complaint Re: COM021813

Please find herewith attached Tipperary County Council’s response to my EPA Complaint (Re: COM021813), which highlighted the ongoing 13 year old neglect of the River Suir in Thurles town centre, by the responsible body, namely Tipperary County Council.

The attached response, penned by Robert O’Brien (Executive Scientist, Environment & Climate Action), outlines the measures being implemented by Tipperary County Council in relation to the serious matters raised with the EPA.

Re: River Suir, Thurles EPA Complaint COM021813 15-09-2026
Dear Mr. Willoughby

I have been tasked by the EPA to contact you to respond to the complaint received by them No:
COM021813 Alleged Pollution of River Suir and how Tipperary County Council are to respond.
I want to acknowledge your longstanding interest in water quality issues within the Thurles area and the
information you have provided regarding observations along the River Suir including photographs and
descriptions of conditions observed at various locations.
Tipperary County Council appreciates the importance of the River Suir as a valuable environmental and
community resource and recognises the concerns raised regarding water quality, litter and the overall
condition of the watercourse.
The Council takes all reports of potential water pollution seriously and recognises the importance of
protecting and improving the water quality of the River Suir and its catchment.
Currently, Tipperary County Council implements a range of water quality protection measures around the
Suir catchment which includes, farm inspections, discharge monitoring and licencing, septic tank
inspections, Water Framework Directive monitoring, and investigation of environmental complaints.
Through these activities, the Council has consistently taken its water quality responsibilities seriously.
In recognition of the challenges affecting water quality within the catchment, Tipperary County Council
has commenced the preparation and implementation of an Upper River Suir Catchment Management
Plan.
The purpose of this initiative is to develop and implement a coordinated strategy to protect, improve and
restore water quality and aquatic ecosystems throughout the Upper River Suir Catchment, including the
Thurles area.

The preparation of the plan is being led by Tipperary County Council and involves collaboration between:

  • Thurles Municipal District;
  • The River Basin Management Service (formerly LAWPRO);
  • The Environment and Climate Action Section;
  • Other relevant stakeholders and agencies as necessary.

A Steering Group has been established to guide the development of the plan and to identify and address
the range of pressures that may be impacting water quality in the catchment.
It is considered that a catchment-based approach provides the most effective framework for identifying
causes of water quality pressures, coordinating actions between relevant agencies and implementing long-
term measures to deliver environmental improvements.
The concerns and observations raised in your correspondence will be taken into consideration as part of
Tipperary County Council’s ongoing work within the catchment. We remain committed to improving water
quality outcomes and to working with relevant stakeholders to protect and enhance the River Suir.
Thank you for taking the time to report your concerns.
Yours sincerely

Signed Robert O’Brien
Executive Scientist
.

Please see my immediate reply, today, to Mr Robert O’Brien.

Dear Mr. O’Brien,
Thank you for your response, dated today September 15th 2026, regarding EPA Complaint Ref: COM021813.

Please see the following links showing affected areas both on the river bank and on the river bed with no effort made to collect litter for the past two years, evidence of which is readily available.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aMhw-kZT6h4 and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jkwq1TVyif4

A check by myself this morning, (September 15th 11:30am), exactly one month following my EPA complaint, shows that absolutely no effort has been undertaken to remove even one solitary piece of this litter by either Thurles Municipal District Council, or by Refresh Thurles, latter who possibly receive funding for such projects.

Neither has there been the installation of even one litter bin being provided in the affected areas.

While I welcome the proposed Upper River Suir Catchment Management Plan and acknowledge the importance of coordinated work to improve water quality, I must express my deep disappointment at the Council’s failure to address the immediate, visible problems raised in my complaint.

Over the past month, I have observed no action to remove the litter, bottles, discarded clothing, supermarket trolleys and other rubbish from the locations concerned. These items remain in and along the River Suir despite the concerns and photographic evidence already supplied.

Your response outlines the Council’s general activities and plans, but provides no account of any inspection of the reported locations, no commitment to remove the rubbish, and no timetable for doing so. A steering group and a catchment management plan may support longer-term improvements, but they do not resolve the immediate problem of waste remaining in the river over the past two years.

I respectfully condemn this continued lack of visible action. The Council’s stated commitment to protecting the River Suir must be demonstrated through practical measures. Residents who take the time to document and report these conditions deserve a response that addresses the specific problems they have identified.

Please provide:

  • Details of any inspections undertaken in response to my complaint, including dates and findings.
  • A clear timetable for the safe removal and appropriate disposal of the reported rubbish, including the supermarket trolleys.
  • The name of the section or officer responsible for coordinating this work.
  • An explanation of any barriers delaying removal and the steps being taken to resolve them.
  • Details of measures to prevent further dumping and monitor the affected locations

If removal requires coordination with another body, appropriate permissions or environmental precautions, please identify these requirements and explain how the Council will progress them.

I request a substantive written response within 10 working days, setting out specific actions and target dates. I also ask that this correspondence be included in the record of EPA Complaint COM021813 and that the EPA be informed that the reported litter remains unresolved.

My purpose is to secure a cleaner, better-protected River Suir. I remain willing to assist by identifying the affected locations, but the information already supplied should now be followed by prompt and accountable action.

Yours sincerely,
George Willoughby.

As is always the case, no reply is anticipated in further communications from Tipperary Co. Council.

Thurles Tipperary Fitness Hub Plans Receive €150,000 As North Tipperary Secures €280,000

Thurles is to receive €150,000 towards plans for an age-friendly community fitness hub, as part of new regeneration funding for North Tipperary.

The available Thurles funding report does not specify the proposed Thurles age-friendly community fitness hub’s exact location or identify who submitted the funding application. {Some unconfirmed reports suggest it refers to the existing open air fitness hub already in the town park.}

Liberty Square, Thurles.

A further €130,000 has been allocated to Nenagh to progress plans to extend St John’s Lane car park and provide pedestrian access onto Sarsfield Street.
We understand, Tipperary County Council has already acquired the lands needed for this Nenagh project. The funding will support the next stages of design and development.

The combined €280,000 allocation for Thurles and Nenagh forms part of nearly €13.5 million announced for Tipperary under the Towns and Cities Regeneration Investment Fund.

Clonmel will receive €13.1 million for two town centre regeneration projects, while Tipperary County Council is to provide €3.25 million in matched funding for the county’s projects.

Nationally, the fund will support 120 projects across every local authority area, with total investment of €409 million.

Tusla Budget Levy: Why Child And Family Services Are Being Asked To Cover Education Overruns

Tusla chief executive Ms Kate Duggan has warned that a levy on the agency’s 2027 budget could increase risks for vulnerable children and families by restricting services during rising demand. The Irish Times reports that officials informed Tusla of its inclusion in May.

The reason is a wider government savings policy. Departments have been instructed to deliver €446 million in efficiencies and reforms in 2027 to offset part of the previous year’s overspending. The Government has promised protection for some spending areas, including infrastructure, social protection and social housing supports.

The Department of Children faces a €42 million levy across its budget. Tusla’s individual contribution is not specified in the reporting.

Ms Duggan disputes the fairness of including the agency, saying it has controlled pay and staffing expenditure and already delivered savings. She described Tusla as being “penalised for overruns in other sectors”. The reporting does not establish that Tusla was selected because of financial mismanagement, or explain why it has not been exempted.

What services are at stake? Tusla’s responsibilities include:

  • Child protection and welfare, including responses to abuse and neglect.
  • Foster care, residential care, special care and aftercare.
  • Family support, early intervention, parenting support and counselling.

Above are examples of Tusla’s services, not a confirmed list of cuts. No specific service closures, staffing reductions or affected locations are identified in the earlier report.

The Department of Children says negotiations aim to achieve savings without cutting Tusla’s services and supports. Ms Duggan’s warning raises a clear question for Budget 2027; how will those protections be delivered while meeting the levy?

Imelda Goldsboro – Political Background And €16,779 Sick-Leave Allowance Payments

Sen. Ms Imelda Goldsboro

Fianna Fáil Senator Ms Imelda Goldsboro received €16,779 in travel and accommodation allowances in 2026 during an eight-month absence, through serious illness, according to an Irish Times report published today, 11th September 2026.

Ms Goldsboro said she continued working in Tipperary and while in hospital. Fianna Fáil subsequently said she was engaging with the Oireachtas to ensure her records and payments were accurate.

Ms Goldsboro’s political career includes serving on Tipperary County Council for the Carrick-on-Suir area from May 2014 until February 2025. She unsuccessfully contested the Tipperary constituency in the 2020 general election, Tipperary South in the 2024 general election, and the Agricultural Panel in the 2025 Seanad election.
She also served on the South East Regional Drug and Alcohol Task Force.
She became a senator in February 2025 last, following her nomination by An Taoiseach Mr Micheál Martin.

Following Ms Goldsboro’s appointment to the Seanad, her daughter Ms Amy Goldsboro, then 21 years of age, won a Fianna Fáil selection convention and was subsequently co-opted unto her mother’s vacant seat on Tipperary County Council, representing the Carrick-on-Suir area.

Travel and accommodation allowance payments continue automatically unless the member gives written instructions to stop them, according to an Irish Times report.

Oireachtas rules allow medically certified illness to be considered when assessing attendance requirements.

Food Alert

Recall of a specific batch of Supervalu Taco Mayonnaise, due to spoilage caused by fermentation.

Alert Summary dated Tuesday, September 8th 2026.

Category 1: For Action.
Alert Notification: 2026.54.
Product Identification: Supervalu Taco Mayonnaise; pack size: 420g.
Batch Code: Best-before date: 18/04/2027.
Country Of Origin: Ireland
.

Message: The above batch of Supervalu Taco Mayonnaise is being recalled due to spoilage caused by fermentation.
Recall notices will be displayed at point of sale.

Action Required: Manufacturers, Wholesalers, Distributors, Caterers and Retailers:
Retailers: Same are requested to remove the implicated batch from sale and display recall notices at point-of-sale.
Consumers: Consumers should not eat the implicated batch.