How many men and women in Tipperary were spotted, on Tuesday last, wearing an ivy leaf in their lapel?
October 6th this year was Budget Day, yet amid the political grandstanding, as opposition politicians appeared more concerned with having their snouts in the trough and criticising a democratically elected government, few, if any, spared a thought for the anniversary of the death of one of Ireland’s greatest patriots, Charles Stewart Parnell.
It was on October 6th, 1891, exactly 135 years ago, that Parnell passed away. His extraordinary contribution to Ireland’s struggle for self-government helped lay the foundations for the independent, prosperous nation we enjoy today; a country that now ranks among the wealthiest in the world.
Surely, on such a significant anniversary, this remarkable Irishman deserved more than to be forgotten amid the political point-scoring of Budget Day.
On October 6th 1891, Charles Stewart Parnell an Irish nationalist politician, died in Brighton, England, aged only 45. Ireland had lost the man remembered for generations as its “Uncrowned King.” Though an Anglican, his funeral on October 11th was at the Irish National non-denominational Glasnevin Cemetery in Dublin, and was attended by more than 200,000 people. His notability was such that his gravestone of unhewn Wicklow granite, erected in 1940, reads only “Parnell”.
Born at Avondale, Co. Wicklow, in 1846, Parnell came from a Protestant landowning family, yet became one of the most powerful leaders of Irish nationalism in the nineteenth century. He transformed the Irish Parliamentary Party into a disciplined political force at Westminster, supported the campaign for tenant farmers during the Land War and brought the demand for Home Rule to the very centre of British politics. His political career ended in tragedy. Following the public revelation of his long relationship with Mrs Katharine O’Shea during divorce proceedings in 1890, the Irish Parliamentary Party split bitterly. Parnell refused to surrender his leadership and continued campaigning throughout Ireland and Britain, while his health rapidly deteriorated.
But Thurles has its own important place in the Parnell story. In January 1885, Parnell travelled personally to Thurles during a dispute over the selection of a parliamentary candidate for Tipperary. Contemporary accounts record that he attended a Home Rule convention in the town and successfully pressed local supporters to accept his preferred candidate, Mr John O’Connor ♦. It was an extraordinary demonstration of the authority Parnell then exercised over the Irish nationalist movement.
♦ In January 1885, Parnell travelled personally to Thurles town to resolve a dispute over the selection of a parliamentary candidate for Tipperary. His preferred candidate was Mr John O’Connor, a Cork-born Fenian, prominent Land League activist and devoted supporter of the Home Rule movement. Local nationalists, however, favoured their own candidate, Mr John O’Ryan, (who previously had been imprisoned as a political suspect, demonstrating that he too had made sacrifices for the nationalist cause). Such was Parnell’s extraordinary authority that his intervention secured O’Ryan’s withdrawal and O’Connor’s unanimous selection. O’Connor subsequently entered Parliament unopposed and remained steadfastly loyal to Parnell, even during the bitter party split of 1890. This historic visit to Thurles stands as a powerful reminder of Parnell’s commanding influence and his determination to unite Irish nationalism in pursuit of self-government.
His name remains part of the everyday geography of Thurles. Parnell Street (Formerly New Street), still runs through the town today, its name appearing in current Tipperary County Council records. It is perhaps easy to pass along that street without stopping to consider the man whose name it carries or why an earlier generation considered his memory important enough to preserve in the streetscape of Thurles.
The Grave of Charles Stewart Parnell, Glasnevin Cemetery, Dublin.
In the Ireland of our great-grandparents, wearing a sprig of ivy, on October 6th, carried a meaning immediately understood by others. It represented remembrance, loyalty and continuing devotion to Parnell and to the political hopes associated with him. James Joyce later preserved that fading world in his famous short story Ivy Day in the Committee Room.
The tradition survives, but seemingly not in Thurles Co. Tipperary and numerous other places in our green land. However, remarkably, Ivy Day has not disappeared altogether. Only this week, marking the 135th anniversary of Parnell’s death, the Parnell Society held its annual commemoration. On Saturday, October 3rd 2026, historians and supporters gathered at Parnell’s ancestral home at Avondale, County Wicklow, for an Ivy Day symposium, examining his political legacy, his involvement in industry, landlord and tenant relations and the Irish Parliamentary Party. The following day, Sunday, October 4th, people again gathered around Parnell’s grave at Glasnevin Cemetery. A wreath was laid and Ms Claire Hanna MP, leader of the SDLP, delivered the annual Ivy Day oration. The ceremony continues a commemorative tradition which began on the first anniversary of Parnell’s death and is now held on the Sunday nearest October 6th each year. What is striking from a Thurles perspective, however, is how completely the old custom appears to have slipped from local public memory.
The Ivy Leaf and the “Dead Chief”. When Parnell was buried at Glasnevin Cemetery in October 1891, his funeral drew an enormous crowd. In the years that followed, October 6th became known as “Ivy Day”. The ivy leaf became the emblem of remembrance for Parnell. Accounts of the tradition tell how mourners took ivy from the walls of Glasnevin cemetery and wore it in their lapels, while another possible origin lies in an ivy wreath placed beside his remains. What is certain is that within a year of his death the ivy leaf had become firmly associated with those who remained loyal to his memory.
Despite Parnell’s documented visit to Thurles, despite a prominent street in the town still bearing his name, and despite the national Ivy Day tradition continuing in 2026, I can find no publicly advertised Ivy Day commemoration in Thurles this year and no obvious continuation locally of the old custom of wearing the ivy leaf on October 6th. That does not prove that no individual in Thurles remembered Parnell privately. But as a visible civic tradition, the wearing of the ivy appears to have disappeared from the town. Perhaps that is worth reflecting upon. There must once have been men and women walking the streets of Thurles on an October morning with a little piece of green ivy pinned to a coat or jacket. To their neighbours, no explanation would have been necessary.
The leaf says simply, Parnell is remembered. Today thousands of us travel along Parnell Street, Thurles, yet comparatively few may know why the street bears that name, that Parnell himself once came to the town, or that for generations October 6th was a special day of remembrance throughout Ireland. Parnell was neither a saint nor a man without controversy. His political career ended amid one of the bitterest divisions Ireland had known. But his historical importance remains beyond dispute. He helped give Irish nationalism political discipline and parliamentary power. He stood at the centre of the struggle that transformed the position of Ireland’s tenant farmers. And he brought the possibility of Irish self-government closer than it had been for generations. When he died, his followers chose a remarkably humble memorial. Not a flag. Not a medal. Not an elaborate badge. Just a small leaf of ivy, evergreen, clinging firmly through winter, and difficult to uproot. One hundred and thirty-five years later, a few people still gather at Glasnevin to remember the “Dead Chief”. Perhaps Thurles, a town which still carries his name on one of its streets and which once witnessed Parnell himself exercising his formidable political authority, might consider remembering ‘Ivy Day’ next year.
Perhaps next Sunday October 11th, the anniversary of Charles Stewart Parnell’s burial in 1891, we might all, including the landowning families of Ireland, pause to remember his extraordinary contribution to our nation. Let each of us pluck a sprig of ivy from the hedgerow and wear it proudly in our lapel or buttonhole, reviving a tradition of remembrance as a simple yet meaningful gesture of gratitude and respect for a man to whom Ireland owes so much.
A small sprig of ivy on October 11th would cost almost nothing. But it might remind another generation why Parnell Street is called Parnell Street and of the remarkable, complicated man who helped change the course of Irish history.
A Tipperary Farmer Who Helped Change Irish Agriculture.
As Ireland marked the 60th anniversary, yesterday October 3rd, of the historic Farmers’ Rights Campaign in Bantry Co Cork, it is fitting to remember the remarkable life and legacy of Mr Rickard Joseph Gerard Deasy (1916–1999).
Although born in Leeson Street, Dublin, on March 13th, 1916, Rickard Deasy was brought up on his family’s farm at Carrigahorig, near Nenagh, Co. Tipperary. It was in North Tipperary that his life as a farmer and farmers’ leader was firmly rooted. Mr Deasy was educated at Ampleforth College in Yorkshire and Christ Church, Oxford, where he studied politics, philosophy and economics. He later joined the Irish Defence Forces and served as an artillery officer. Following the death of his mother in the 1940s, he left the Army and returned to Carrigahorig, Nenagh, Co. Tipperary, where he developed the family holding to almost 200 acres.
Farmers’ Rights Tipperary Campaigner the late Mr Rickard Deasy.
He became involved in the National Farmers’ Association through its Terryglass, Nenagh branch and rose through the organisation to become President in 1961. His defining moment would came in October 1966.
On October 7th, Deasy and 16 local farmers set out from Bantry, County Cork, on a 217 mile march to Dublin. As the march progressed, farmers joined from across the country, with around 30,000 participating along the route before the campaign converged on the capital.
The campaign sought something fundamental; recognition of farmers’ right to negotiate directly with Government, rather than merely being consulted on decisions affecting their livelihoods. Its ‘Declaration of Farmers’ Rights’ called for recognition of 11 basic rights for rural and farming families. The movement drew inspiration from the international civil-rights movement and, in particular, Martin Luther King Jr.’s March on Washington in 1963. The declaration also invoked the promise of equality contained in the 1916 Proclamation.
When the Government initially refused to meet the NFA leadership, nine farmers began a sit-in at Government Buildings which lasted for three weeks. The dispute subsequently escalated into road and bridge blockades, a rates strike and the imprisonment of dozens of farmers. Eventually, significant progress was made on the right to negotiate, while farmer representatives secured places on important marketing and advisory bodies. The IFA today regards the campaign as one of the decisive events in the history of organised Irish farming.
Mr Deasy and Mr Charles Haughey The campaign also brought Mr Deasy into direct confrontation with the then Minister for Agriculture, Mr Charles J. Haughey. Mr Haughey’s initial refusal to meet the farmers helped turn the protest into a major political confrontation. The episode was damaging to his standing as Minister for Agriculture, although this did not prevent Mr Haughey’s later rise to become leader of Fianna Fáil and Taoiseach. But it is reasonable to regard the Farmers’ Rights Campaign as a serious setback for Mr Haughey at that stage of his political career.
The Political Price Paid by Mr Deasy. There was a striking irony in Mr Rickard Deasy’s later career. Although he had successfully mobilised thousands of farmers nationally, he was unable to convert that prominence into electoral success. In the 1969 general election, Mr Deasy stood for the Labour Party in Tipperary North, but received only 517 first-preference votes, about 1.8% of the poll, and was not elected. His poor showing was extraordinary for a man who had been one of Ireland’s best-known farming leaders just three years earlier. Some later accounts suggest that his image as a militant campaigner worked against him politically, while he was also portrayed by some critics as a “Marxist”. What is beyond doubt is that Mr Deasy’s electoral failure contrasted sharply with the success of the movement he had previously led.
Sixty Years Later At the 60th-anniversary commemoration in Bantry, yesterday October 3rd, 2026, IFA President Mr Francie Gorman described the Farmers’ Rights Campaign as a seminal event in the history of the NFA and IFA. He said the right to negotiate, fought for in 1966, remained as important to farmers six decades later. Several surviving participants in the original march were also present at the event.
For County Tipperary, there is particular reason to remember Rickard Deasy of Carrigahorig and Terryglass; farmer; Army Officer, campaigner, and national farming leader. From his Tipperary farm he rose to lead one of the most significant rural protest movements in modern Irish history. The campaign helped secure a recognised voice for Irish farmers in their dealings with Government and strengthened the organisation that later became the Irish Farmers’ Association in 1971.
Mr Rickard Deasy died at Nenagh Hospital on July 13th, 1999. His contribution to Irish farming, and his deep association with North Tipperary, remain an important part of our local and national history.
Mr Deasy never became a TD, but his legacy is arguably more enduring; he helped ensure that Irish farmers had a recognised voice at the table of Irish Government.
Cllr. Jim Ryan deserves congratulations for taking the lead in demanding action on the condition of the River Suir in Thurles, and for securing a commitment that large fallen trees lying across the river will be removed as soon as possible.
At Monday’s Thurles District meeting, Cllr. Ryan pressed for a commitment to tackle the extensive weeds and reeds. Local representatives were presented with an outline rehabilitation plan for the river, with details expected to be finalised later this month.
River Suir, Thurles Town Centre.
Mr Fran Igoe of the ‘River Basin Management Service’, (formerly LAWPRO), explained that dredging or cutting vegetation alone is unlikely to resolve the underlying problems. Excess nutrients entering the river from agricultural run-off and other sources are contributing to the growth, and these causes must be addressed if improvements are to last.
LAWPRO’s recent change of name to the River Basin Management Service also deserves scrutiny. The stated justification is that the new title better reflects its expanded work and its role in coordinating Ireland’s River Basin Management Plan. However, the organisation confirms that its mission, structure and responsibilities remain unchanged. Residents are entitled to ask what the rebranding cost and what practical benefit it will bring to places such as Thurles.
Due to neglect, dredging can only be the answer to the Thurles, River Suir problem.
“This clearer name may help explain the service’s role, but its success must be judged by measurable improvements in water quality, effective coordination and delivery of promised action on the river Suir”, stated Cllr Ryan.
Nevertheless, concerns about the river’s condition deserve clear answers. Kick-sampling tests reportedly found little or no river-life activity. “Residents need to know what the findings mean and what measures, including any appropriate vegetation management, will form part of the rehabilitation plan”, he continued.
Refresh Thurles Tidy Towns volunteers who this week removed bottles and cans; whose presence on the riverbed had reportedly been well documented as sitting there for two years, after Cllr Ryan highlighted the problem. Disappointingly, further dumping was reported this morning. The council must now provide a suitable litter bin and arrange regular collection to support the efforts of these volunteers.
Deplorable state of River Suir permitted and acknowledged by Tipperary Co. Co..
With water levels rising, there are concerns that substantial work could be delayed until next spring or early summer. Any machinery access must also be carefully planned to protect the newly laid tarmac footpaths along the river bank.
European and Irish public funding already supports farmers in protecting waterways through ACRES, Farming for Water EIP and TAMS grants for measures such as buffer zones, fencing and alternative livestock drinking supplies. Payments depend on eligibility and approved actions, rather than simply owning riverside land.
“Residents are entitled to ask how these supports are being used in the Suir catchment and what measurable improvements they are delivering”, said Cllr. Ryan.
The commitment given to Cllr. Ryan to remove fallen trees is indeed a welcome step; but residents now need a clear timetable and a rehabilitation plan that delivers lasting improvements long term.
The summer foliage is dying back, unveiling more of the uncollected rubbish along the banks and in the River Suir in central Thurles. Bottles, cans, flower pots and other litter remain, while fallen trees and uncontrolled shrubbery continue to obstruct the river, as the stench persists.
After more than 13 year, the problems remain unresolved. Certainly over the past six weeks, despite my contact with the Environmental Protection Agency and Tipperary County Council, there have been no meaningful progress on the continuing litter, obstructions and overall pollution. The installation of litter bins also still remains unaddressed.
Two Years On – Bed Of River Suir At Low Tide.
Dear Mr Willoughby, Further to previous correspondence and responding to your concerns, the EPA wrote to Tipperary County Council seeking a written response from them on actions taken or planned on this matter. The Council responded to the EPA on 15/09/2026. However, the response did not provide sufficient information. The EPA has therefore requested further information from the Council. We will provide you with an update in three weeks. In the interim, we recommend you continue to report any further issues relating to this matter to the Council. Please use the reference number above in any further communication with the EPA regarding this matter. Trusting this is of assistance to you. Kind regards, Signed:Ms Shelly Laffan (Complaints Unit | Office of Environmental Enforcement) (Aonad Gearán na hOifige Forfheidhmithe i leith cúrsaí Comhshaoil)
Now, a response to my initial complaint from Ms Shelly Laffan, of the EPA’s Complaints Unit, Office of Environmental Enforcement, raises further questions about the Council’s handling of this matter.
The EPA confirms that it sought a written response (See above) from Tipperary County Council on actions taken or planned. The Council replied on September 15th 2026, but the EPA states: “However, the response did not provide sufficient information.”
The EPA has now requested further information and says it will update me in three weeks. In the meantime, it advises me to continue reporting further issues to the Council and to use my complaint reference [Ref: COM021813], in future correspondence with the EPA.
Thurles residents deserve to know what action if any is being actually taken, and when visible work will begin.
The Stench Continues. Where Is the Public Accountability?
The accompanying video hereunder records what appears to be effluent entering the river. It also shows a flat flagstone positioned over one pipe outlet, raising questions about whether the discharge is being obscured. Who placed it there, and why, requires investigation. The discharge itself needs to be identified and its source established.
I have also received reports of fish found floating near ‘The Willows’ housing estate in the recent past. The account relayed to me attributes this to an accidental chemical spill washed into the Suir through a connected surface-water drainage pipe. That explanation remains unconfirmed. The relevant authorities should establish what happened and publish their findings, including any available sampling results.
These concerns have a history. Local reporting in May described dumped shopping trolleys, plastic debris and suspected effluent along this same town-centre river.
Despite a political promotional video, 13 years too late, same highlighting the river’s condition, no subsequent update has come from same hand holding politicians, with the sole exception of local councillor Mr Jim Ryan who has taken up the cause. His communication on local radio over past months is acknowledged. Others,, if any, who have publicly expressed concern should explain what further follow-up they have undertaken.
Tipperary County Council should also now publish a dated programme for litter removal, for required bin provisions and assessment of the fallen-tree obstructions. The relevant authorities must investigate the discharges, explain their findings and identify who is responsible for each next step. Every further week of delay leaves the rubbish, the smell and the unanswered questions with the people of Thurles.
A copy of today’s updated report has been forwarded to all those responsible for this crime of neglect.
The River Suir deserves urgent care, sustained maintenance and public accountability. When will that work become visible?
Farmers Must Be Supported To Prepare For Ever More Compounding Climate Extremes Says Climate Change Advisory Council.
Council calls for farmers to be supported with land-specific climate information, technology and practical advice to prepare for a changing climate.
The Agriculture sector has not met its commitment to reduce emissions by 10% by 2025, and without a stronger push, will not meet its 2030 commitments.
Just 2,527 hectares of new forest were planted in 2025 against an annual target of 8,000 hectares.
Progress on bio-methane remains far behind the pace required.
Mr Alex White – (Chairperson Climate Change Advisory Council).
Launching the Agriculture and Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry chapter of its Annual Review 2026 today, the Climate Change Advisory Council said farmers are increasingly having to manage very different risks throughout the year due to extreme conditions including excessive rainfall, heatwaves and drought.
Rather than reacting to individual weather crises as they occur, the Council says farmers should be better equipped to understand the long-term risks facing their land and businesses in a climate that is becoming increasingly extreme. It is calling on the Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine (DAFM) to develop and deploy, within 12 months, a practical climate-risk toolkit tailored to individual land parcels.
Alongside better information, farmers need access to practical advice, financial support and viable alternatives to existing practices that are more climate resilient. Restoring soil, water and ecosystem functions can help farms absorb extreme-weather shocks and maintain productivity, while some farmers may choose to adapt existing practices or diversify into new sources of income.
The Review also warns that Ireland’s reliance on imported fruit and vegetables leaves the food system vulnerable to climate-related crop failures elsewhere and supply-chain disruption, and calls for a review of how domestic horticulture could strengthen food security.
Agriculture emissions fell by just 0.2% in 2025 and are now 4.7% below the 2018 baseline – less than half of the 10% reduction commitment from government for 2025. EPA projections indicate that the ‘with additional measures’ scenario would deliver an approximately 19% reduction in Agriculture emissions by 2030, compared with the 25% target. The Council notes that the 25% target remains achievable if additional diversification measures identified in the Climate Action Plan are also fully implemented.
To close this gap, DAFM should develop and begin implementing, a time-bound and properly resourced plan to accelerate emissions-reduction measures on farms, informed by structured dialogue with farmers, rural communities and workers.
The Forestry sector remains a particular concern. Ireland is not close to meeting its annual afforestation target of 8,000 hectares, leaving Ireland substantially off track for 18% forest cover by mid-century and contributing to a weakening forest carbon sink. The next Forestry Programme must address the financial, administrative and practical barriers preventing greater participation.
Significant public funding has been committed to anaerobic digestion under the Biomethane Strategy, but delays to the Renewable Heat Obligation are holding back the market certainty needed to unlock investment and demand. Progressing the obligation is essential if bio-methane is to support farm diversification and energy security.
Mr Alex White, (Chairperson of the Climate Change Advisory Council), said:
“Farmers are increasingly having to manage extremes – this year we have seen too much water at one time of year and too little at another. We cannot keep treating every prolonged wet period or drought as an isolated crisis. Climate change is challenging some of the established practices involved in agriculture and land management. Practical support will be essential, whether that means making land and farms more resilient, adapting existing practices or pursuing viable opportunities for diversification, including forestry, carbon farming and renewable energy. The transition has to be shaped in collaboration with rural communities and farmers, and not simply designed for them. Policy will be more effective if it reflects the practical realities, costs and opportunities on the ground, while delivering the emissions reductions Ireland needs.”
View News from the Climate Change Advisory Council HERE.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish.AcceptRead More
Privacy & Cookies Policy
Privacy Overview
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
Recent Comments