Archives

Garvaghy Road – From One Man’s Tipperary Perspective

Garvaghy Road: Two Natures, One Choice – What Are We Feeding?

There is a short but powerful poem, attributed to an unknown author, which seems particularly relevant to the recent events surrounding Garvaghy Road and Drumcree.

“TWO NATURES” — Anonymous

“Two natures beat within my breast,
The one is foul, the one is blessed,
The one I love, the one I hate,
The one I feed will dominate
.”

The above four simple lines contain a profound truth about human nature, personal responsibility and the choices we make. Perhaps they also offer a timely lesson for everyone involved in the continuing Garvaghy Road dispute.

For nearly thirty years, Drumcree has represented far more than a disagreement over a parade route. It has become entangled with identity, religious tradition, community rights, historical grievances and painful memories.
The recent decision by the Parades Commission to permit a restricted Orange Order parade, the opposition of local residents supported by Sinn Féin, and the subsequent intervention by the Secretary of State have demonstrated how easily old wounds can be reopened.

But beyond the legal decisions, political statements and protests lies a deeper moral question. What kind of society are we choosing to feed? Are we feeding resentment, suspicion, bitterness and the determination to defeat the other? Or are we feeding understanding, restraint, compassion, mutual respect and the courage to seek reconciliation?

The Orange tradition carries deep historical, cultural and religious significance for those who belong to it. That deserves recognition.
Equally, the people of Garvaghy Road have their own history, identity, dignity and deeply held concerns about what happens within their community. That deserves recognition too.
Recognising one does not require dismissing the other. Sinn Féin, like every political party, has a legitimate responsibility to represent its supporters. But political leadership also requires ensuring that strong convictions do not become obstacles to understanding or deepen the fears of others.

The same responsibility applies to unionist representatives and the leadership of the Orange Order. The Parades Commission faces the difficult task of balancing competing rights, responsibilities and public concerns. Its decisions may properly be supported, criticised or legally challenged.

Yet an important distinction remains: The law may determine what is permitted, but conscience must also ask what is wise, compassionate and conducive to peace.
That question applies to everyone. Surely Christian faith calls us to something better than continuing confrontation.
The Apostle Paul reminds us (in Galatians Chapter 5) of the struggle between the flesh and the Spirit. Among the fruits of the Spirit are love, peace, patience, kindness, gentleness and self-control.
These are not simply admirable words to proclaim on a given Sunday. They must be demonstrated in our relationships with neighbours, especially those with whom we disagree. After all, if we claim to uphold Christian principles, they should be visible in how we treat others.
A Christian witness is not strengthened by provoking fear, humiliating neighbours or insisting that one community’s dignity must come at another’s expense.
Nor is lasting peace built through threats, intimidation or inflammatory language from any quarter. Peace requires more than the absence of violence. It requires the presence of mutual respect.

There is a particular responsibility upon Sinn Féin, Unionist Political Leaders, the Orange Order, the Parades Commission, Churches and Community Representatives to contribute constructively to a more peaceful society.
Words matter. Attitudes matter. The examples we set matter. Every inflammatory statement feeds something. Every gesture of understanding feeds something else and over time, what we repeatedly feed becomes stronger.

The lesson of Garvaghy Road should not be that one community must triumph over another. Neither can build a better future while remaining imprisoned within the divisions of the past. That does not mean abandoning convictions, ignoring historical wrongs or dismissing genuine fears. It means recognising that conviction without compassion can become stubbornness, tradition without sensitivity can become provocation, and rights without corresponding responsibilities can damage relationships.
There is no dishonour in listening, no disgrace in compromise and no weakness in choosing reconciliation over confrontation.
Sometimes the greatest demonstration of strength is the willingness to refrain from something because we recognise the hurt it may cause another.

Garvaghy Road presents a choice reaching far beyond Portadown. Do we genuinely want a shared future, or merely a continuation of old divisions?
The poet leaves us with a warning: “The one I feed will dominate.” That is true of individuals, political parties, institutions, churches and communities. It is true of Northern Ireland. If we continue feeding division, division will flourish. But if we nurture understanding, humility, mutual respect and reconciliation, something better may finally take root. And for those professing Christian faith, loving our neighbour was never intended to mean loving only those who share our traditions, politics or interpretation of history. It means loving our neighbour even when we disagree.

So perhaps the most important question concerning Garvaghy Road is not who will prevail. It is simply this; Which nature are we feeding? Are we feeding the divisions of yesterday, or the reconciliation that tomorrow so desperately needs?

TV Licence Revenue Drops €5.7 Million As Thousands Fewer Irish Households Pay

RTÉ’s TV Licence Crisis – Poor Programming, Lost Trust and a Public Asking Where Its Money Goes.

RTÉ is facing a growing crisis of confidence, and falling television licence revenue should be a wake-up call for both the broadcaster and the Government.
New figures reveal that TV licence income fell by €5.7 million, during the first nine months of 2026, with 35,748 fewer licences sold compared with the same period last year.

But why are people turning away from the licence system?
The financial controversies surrounding RTÉ have undoubtedly damaged public confidence. Questions about management; excessive costs; accountability and transparency; have left many licence payers questioning whether their money is being spent wisely.

Then there is the quality of television programming itself.
Many viewers regard RTÉ’s regular television output as disappointing, with complaints about repeats, predictable entertainment formats, limited original programming and a lack of fresh ideas.
While RTÉ still attracts substantial audiences for major sporting occasions, news and special events, that does not necessarily mean viewers are satisfied with its everyday television schedules.
Critics believe the broadcaster should invest more in quality Irish drama, documentaries, investigative journalism, regional programmes, arts and culture, and fresh entertainment that reflects modern Irish society.

RTÉ also faces fierce competition from streaming platforms, which offer viewers extensive on-demand choice. Younger audiences in particular are increasingly moving away from traditional television.
Yet Irish households with a qualifying television are still legally required to pay €160 annually, regardless of how often they watch RTÉ.
The fundamental question is simple: Is RTÉ providing sufficient quality, choice and value for the money it receives?

The answer cannot simply be to pursue more people for unpaid licences or demand additional public funding.
RTÉ needs to demonstrate meaningful reform, stronger accountability, responsible spending and a programming schedule that audiences genuinely want to watch.
Public service broadcasting remains important to Ireland, but public funding must come with public accountability.
Perhaps the biggest challenge facing RTÉ is not simply collecting the licence fee. It is rebuilding public confidence and convincing viewers that the service is worth supporting.

What do you think? Has the quality of RTÉ’s television programming declined, and does it still offer value for money?

Charles Stewart Parnell, Ivy Day And A Tradition Thurles Has Almost Forgotten

Charles Stewart Parnell, (1846 – 1891).

How many men and women in Tipperary were spotted, on Tuesday last, wearing an ivy leaf in their lapel?

October 6th this year was Budget Day, yet amid the political grandstanding, as opposition politicians appeared more concerned with having their snouts in the trough and criticising a democratically elected government, few, if any, spared a thought for the anniversary of the death of one of Ireland’s greatest patriots, Charles Stewart Parnell.

It was on October 6th, 1891, exactly 135 years ago, that Parnell passed away. His extraordinary contribution to Ireland’s struggle for self-government helped lay the foundations for the independent, prosperous nation we enjoy today; a country that now ranks among the wealthiest in the world.

Surely, on such a significant anniversary, this remarkable Irishman deserved more than to be forgotten amid the political point-scoring of Budget Day.

On October 6th 1891, Charles Stewart Parnell an Irish nationalist politician, died in Brighton, England, aged only 45. Ireland had lost the man remembered for generations as its “Uncrowned King.” Though an Anglican, his funeral on October 11th was at the Irish National non-denominational Glasnevin Cemetery in Dublin, and was attended by more than 200,000 people. His notability was such that his gravestone of unhewn Wicklow granite, erected in 1940, reads only “Parnell”.

Born at Avondale, Co. Wicklow, in 1846, Parnell came from a Protestant landowning family, yet became one of the most powerful leaders of Irish nationalism in the nineteenth century. He transformed the Irish Parliamentary Party into a disciplined political force at Westminster, supported the campaign for tenant farmers during the Land War and brought the demand for Home Rule to the very centre of British politics.
His political career ended in tragedy. Following the public revelation of his long relationship with Mrs Katharine O’Shea during divorce proceedings in 1890, the Irish Parliamentary Party split bitterly. Parnell refused to surrender his leadership and continued campaigning throughout Ireland and Britain, while his health rapidly deteriorated.

But Thurles has its own important place in the Parnell story. In January 1885, Parnell travelled personally to Thurles during a dispute over the selection of a parliamentary candidate for Tipperary. Contemporary accounts record that he attended a Home Rule convention in the town and successfully pressed local supporters to accept his preferred candidate, Mr John O’Connor ♦. It was an extraordinary demonstration of the authority Parnell then exercised over the Irish nationalist movement.

♦ In January 1885, Parnell travelled personally to Thurles town to resolve a dispute over the selection of a parliamentary candidate for Tipperary. His preferred candidate was Mr John O’Connor, a Cork-born Fenian, prominent Land League activist and devoted supporter of the Home Rule movement. Local nationalists, however, favoured their own candidate, Mr John O’Ryan, (who previously had been imprisoned as a political suspect, demonstrating that he too had made sacrifices for the nationalist cause). Such was Parnell’s extraordinary authority that his intervention secured O’Ryan’s withdrawal and O’Connor’s unanimous selection.
O’Connor subsequently entered Parliament unopposed and remained steadfastly loyal to Parnell, even during the bitter party split of 1890. This historic visit to Thurles stands as a powerful reminder of Parnell’s commanding influence and his determination to unite Irish nationalism in pursuit of self-government.

His name remains part of the everyday geography of Thurles. Parnell Street (Formerly New Street), still runs through the town today, its name appearing in current Tipperary County Council records. It is perhaps easy to pass along that street without stopping to consider the man whose name it carries or why an earlier generation considered his memory important enough to preserve in the streetscape of Thurles.

The Grave of Charles Stewart Parnell, Glasnevin Cemetery, Dublin.

In the Ireland of our great-grandparents, wearing a sprig of ivy, on October 6th, carried a meaning immediately understood by others. It represented remembrance, loyalty and continuing devotion to Parnell and to the political hopes associated with him.
James Joyce later preserved that fading world in his famous short story Ivy Day in the Committee Room.

The tradition survives, but seemingly not in Thurles Co. Tipperary and numerous other places in our green land. However, remarkably, Ivy Day has not disappeared altogether. Only this week, marking the 135th anniversary of Parnell’s death, the Parnell Society held its annual commemoration. On Saturday, October 3rd 2026, historians and supporters gathered at Parnell’s ancestral home at Avondale, County Wicklow, for an Ivy Day symposium, examining his political legacy, his involvement in industry, landlord and tenant relations and the Irish Parliamentary Party.
The following day, Sunday, October 4th, people again gathered around Parnell’s grave at Glasnevin Cemetery. A wreath was laid and Ms Claire Hanna MP, leader of the SDLP, delivered the annual Ivy Day oration. The ceremony continues a commemorative tradition which began on the first anniversary of Parnell’s death and is now held on the Sunday nearest October 6th each year.
What is striking from a Thurles perspective, however, is how completely the old custom appears to have slipped from local public memory.

The Ivy Leaf and the “Dead Chief”.
When Parnell was buried at Glasnevin Cemetery in October 1891, his funeral drew an enormous crowd. In the years that followed, October 6th became known as “Ivy Day”.
The ivy leaf became the emblem of remembrance for Parnell. Accounts of the tradition tell how mourners took ivy from the walls of Glasnevin cemetery and wore it in their lapels, while another possible origin lies in an ivy wreath placed beside his remains. What is certain is that within a year of his death the ivy leaf had become firmly associated with those who remained loyal to his memory.

Despite Parnell’s documented visit to Thurles, despite a prominent street in the town still bearing his name, and despite the national Ivy Day tradition continuing in 2026, I can find no publicly advertised Ivy Day commemoration in Thurles this year and no obvious continuation locally of the old custom of wearing the ivy leaf on October 6th.
That does not prove that no individual in Thurles remembered Parnell privately. But as a visible civic tradition, the wearing of the ivy appears to have disappeared from the town. Perhaps that is worth reflecting upon.
There must once have been men and women walking the streets of Thurles on an October morning with a little piece of green ivy pinned to a coat or jacket. To their neighbours, no explanation would have been necessary.

The leaf says simply, Parnell is remembered. Today thousands of us travel along Parnell Street, Thurles, yet comparatively few may know why the street bears that name, that Parnell himself once came to the town, or that for generations October 6th was a special day of remembrance throughout Ireland.
Parnell was neither a saint nor a man without controversy. His political career ended amid one of the bitterest divisions Ireland had known. But his historical importance remains beyond dispute.
He helped give Irish nationalism political discipline and parliamentary power. He stood at the centre of the struggle that transformed the position of Ireland’s tenant farmers. And he brought the possibility of Irish self-government closer than it had been for generations.
When he died, his followers chose a remarkably humble memorial. Not a flag. Not a medal. Not an elaborate badge. Just a small leaf of ivy, evergreen, clinging firmly through winter, and difficult to uproot.
One hundred and thirty-five years later, a few people still gather at Glasnevin to remember the “Dead Chief”.
Perhaps Thurles, a town which still carries his name on one of its streets and which once witnessed Parnell himself exercising his formidable political authority, might consider remembering ‘Ivy Day’ next year.

Perhaps next Sunday October 11th, the anniversary of Charles Stewart Parnell’s burial in 1891, we might all, including the landowning families of Ireland, pause to remember his extraordinary contribution to our nation. Let each of us pluck a sprig of ivy from the hedgerow and wear it proudly in our lapel or buttonhole, reviving a tradition of remembrance as a simple yet meaningful gesture of gratitude and respect for a man to whom Ireland owes so much.

A small sprig of ivy on October 11th would cost almost nothing. But it might remind another generation why Parnell Street is called Parnell Street and of the remarkable, complicated man who helped change the course of Irish history.

Derelict Tipperary – Government Turns Up The Heat On Empty And Abandoned Properties

Not before time, owners of derelict properties across Co. Tipperary are facing a tougher new regime as the Government moves to increase pressure on long-neglected buildings and bring more vacant properties back into use.

Budget 2027 has put dereliction firmly back on the agenda, with plans for a new ‘Derelict Property Tax’ intended to strengthen enforcement nationally.
For Tipperary, however, the crackdown is already well under way. Tipperary County Council says the number of properties on its Derelict Sites Register rose from 84 in January 2025 to more than 120 by the end of that year, as its Vacant Homes Team stepped up efforts to identify neglected buildings and engage with owners.
The Council has also initiated compulsory purchase proceedings, with one property already transferred into Council ownership.

Owners face a clear choice.
At present, once a property is entered on the Derelict Sites Register, Tipperary County Council can require its owner to carry out works to remove the dereliction.
Failure to act can lead to financial penalties, an annual levy equivalent to 7% of the property’s market value, court proceedings or, ultimately, the property being acquired through a Compulsory Purchase Order.

That means the message to owners is becoming increasingly clear:

Repair it. Sell it. Bring it back into use. Or face escalating intervention.

Tipperary is already identifying more properties The increase in properties appearing on the county’s register is significant.
Rather than waiting for complaints alone, the Council says its teams have been actively identifying vacant and derelict sites throughout Co. Tipperary and intensifying engagement with owners.
Residents can also report suspected vacant or derelict properties, which the Council’s Vacant Homes Team can then investigate and follow up with the owner.
This could have major implications for all towns and villages where abandoned houses, former shops and deteriorating buildings have remained unused for years.

But there is money available to save these buildings
The Government’s approach is not based solely on taxation and enforcement.
Owners and purchasers of qualifying properties in Tipperary can currently receive up to €50,000 through the Vacant Property Refurbishment Grant, with an additional €20,000, where the building is confirmed as derelict.
That means a qualifying derelict property could receive grant assistance of up to €70,000 to bring it back into residential use. The scheme is already having a substantial impact locally.
By the time Tipperary County Council prepared its 2026 budget, it had received 784 applications, approved 576 of them and recorded more than €33 million in housing investment through the programme. More than 200 completed properties had already returned to occupation.

Empty rooms over shops are also being targeted.
A further initiative launched this year could make a significant difference to Tipperary’s town centres. Since March 2026, grants of up to €135,000 have been available to help convert qualifying vacant space above commercial premises into homes.
There is also additional funding where an entire former commercial building is being converted into multiple residential units.
These measures could prove particularly important in traditional Tipperary town centres, where many street-level shops remain in use, while upper floors have stood empty for decades.

A major test for Tipperary, The policies are now in place. The real question is whether enforcement will follow. Tipperary has hundreds of buildings and sites capable of becoming homes, businesses or community facilities instead of remaining boarded up and deteriorating.
The Government and local authorities are increasingly combining grants for those willing to act with financial penalties and compulsory purchase powers for properties that remain derelict.
For owners, the days when an abandoned building could simply be left untouched indefinitely may be coming to an end. For the people of Tipperary, the hope will be that this new push does more than add names to a register.

The real measure of success will be seeing boarded-up and crumbling properties restored, occupied and brought back into the life of our towns and villages.

Thurles, Co. Tipperary Left Waiting Again – Where Is The Urgency On Our Road Upgrades?

Thurles Deserves Delivery – Not More Delays, Excuses And Failed Announcements.

The continuing delay recently announced on the redevelopment of Liberty Square, (Part 2) and Slievenamon Road raises a much wider question about infrastructure delivery in Thurles town, and about what our political representatives are actually achieving for the town in Dáil Éireann.
How much longer is Thurles expected to wait for basic infrastructure that other major towns would regard as essential?

The first phase of the Liberty Square redevelopment commenced in August 2020 and was officially opened in June 2022. Yet the adjoining N62 Slievenamon Road Phase 2 project; from Liberty Square to the Shopping Centre roundabout, is now not expected to begin until 2027 at least, with completion potentially stretching to the the final weeks of 2028.
That is an extraordinary timescale for completing the redevelopment of the centre of one of Tipperary’s largest towns.

Promised completion since 2022 following part one completion in 2022.

Tipperary County Council points to dependencies involving Transport Infrastructure Ireland and Uisce Éireann. But after years of delay, the public is entitled to ask why these issues were not identified, coordinated and resolved far earlier.
Even more difficult to understand is the condition of parts of Liberty Square itself. Potholes, eroded road surfaces and deteriorating sections should not have to await another multimillion-euro capital project. Basic maintenance is a separate responsibility. A promise that major works may eventually take place cannot justify leaving existing surfaces in poor condition in the meantime.

There is also another deeply unpleasant issue which deserves a proper public explanation. Sewer pipes were installed during the Liberty Square redevelopment works in 2021. Since then, complaints have been publicly reported about foul odours and what has been described as sewer gas or a sewage-type stench issuing from drains in parts of Liberty Square east.
If these odours arose following the drainage works, the obvious questions must be asked;
“Were the new drainage and sewer arrangements correctly designed and installed?
“Have they been independently inspected and tested?”
“What is causing the continuing smell, and why has it not been permanently rectified?

Until Tipperary County Council or Uisce Éireann produces the technical evidence, it would be wrong to simply declare defective installation as proven. But equally, persistent reports of sewage-type odours following major drainage works cannot simply be ignored. The people working, shopping and living in the centre of Thurles deserve an explanation and a permanent solution.

Constant traffic congestion caused by failure to provide inner relief road and Thurles bypass.

And Liberty Square is only part of a much bigger infrastructure failure.
The Thurles Inner Relief Road has been talked about for years, yet the town is still waiting for the level of funding necessary to turn plans, designs and consultancy work into actual construction.
Then there is the Thurles Bypass; another project discussed for decades and repeatedly presented as essential to removing through-traffic and heavy vehicles from the town centre.
Announcements, inclusion in plans, feasibility studies and ministerial visits are not roads.
Funding, construction contracts, machinery on site and completed infrastructure are what matter.

Which brings us directly to political accountability.
Thurles is represented in Dáil Éireann by Mr Michael Lowry TD and Mr Ryan O’Meara TD.
Both are entitled to point to representations they have made, meetings attended and projects they have sought to advance.

But voters are equally entitled to ask a much tougher question:
What are Mr Michael Lowry and Mr Ryan O’Meara actually achieving in Dáil Éireann for Thurles?
Where is the construction funding for the Inner Relief Road?
When will there be a fully funded programme and credible construction timetable for the Thurles Bypass?
Why has completion of Liberty Square and Slievenamon Road been allowed to stretch towards 2028?
And why, after millions of euro have already been spent on Liberty Square, are residents and businesses still having to complain about potholes, eroded surfaces and foul smells apparently emanating from the drainage system?

Political effectiveness should ultimately be measured by results. Not another series of video’s and press releases. Not another photograph taken standing beside a Minister or a wealthy business man. Not another announcement that a project is being “progressed”. Not another promise that funding will be sought.

Thurles needs funding secured, contracts signed, problems fixed and projects delivered. After years of waiting, that is hardly too much to ask.

That is also the test for Tipperary County Council, Mr Michael Lowry TD and Mr Ryan O’Meara TD. Thurles does not need another announcement. It needs delivery.