Transport « Thurles Information

Gardaí Seek Witnesses Following Fatal Crash Near Dundrum, Co. Tipperary.

Gardaí have launched an appeal for witnesses after a man in his 50s was killed in a single-vehicle collision in County Tipperary.

The fatal crash happened on the R505 near Dundrum shortly before 5.50pm on yesterday afternoon, July 16th 2026.
The driver, who was the only person reported to be involved, was pronounced dead at the scene. His remains were later taken to University Hospital Waterford, where a post-mortem examination is due to be carried out. The local coroner has been informed.

The R505 remained closed following the collision to allow Garda forensic collision investigators to conduct a technical examination of the scene. Diversions were put in place for motorists travelling through the area.

Investigating officers are particularly interested in hearing from anyone who used the road near Dundrum between 5:30pm and 6:00pm on Thursday.
Drivers and other road users who recorded footage in the area are being urged to check their devices. Gardaí said dash-cam video, mobile phone recordings or any other camera footage could assist the investigation and should be provided to officers.
Anyone who witnessed the crash, noticed the vehicle before the collision, or has information that may help establish what happened, is asked to come forward.

Five people have lost their lives in road traffic collisions within County Tipperary so far in 2026; as of yesterday, July 17th 2026. The confirmed fatalities occurred on:-
8th February: Man in his 70s, single-vehicle collision near Holycross.
8th March: Woman in her 20s, pedestrian collision near Templemore.
12th May: Woman in her 20s, two-car collision near Nenagh.
11th June: Motorcyclist in his 30s, collision near Carrick-on-Suir.
16th July: Man in his 50s, yesterday single-vehicle collision on the R505 near Dundrum.

Information can be given to Tipperary Garda Station by calling Tel: 062 80670. Members of the public may also contact the Garda Confidential Line on Tel: 1800 666 111 or indeed speak with officers at any Garda station.

The investigation into the circumstances surrounding the collision remains ongoing. Gardaí have thanked the public for assistance.

Thurles Deserves Roads, Not More Political Promises.

For years, the people of Thurles have heard announcements, assurances and political claims about the Inner Relief Road and the long-promised Outer Ring Road. Yet despite all the publicity and political celebration, Thurles still has no completed Inner relief road, no Outer Ring Road and no binding construction timetable that the public can honestly rely upon.

Mr Michael Lowry TD and Mr Ryan O’Meara TD, who both support the present government, must now accept political responsibility for the continuing lack of measurable progress. Meetings, press releases and statements welcoming developments are not substitutes for an approved budget, completed design, signed construction contract and machinery working on site.

Tipperary County Council describes the Inner Relief Road as approximately 1.1 kilometres of new road linking the N62 at Slievenamon Road with Mill Road. The scheme includes a new bridge over the River Suir, several junctions and associated flood-relief works. However, the council’s May 2026 management report still stated that Department of Transport approval was required before the project could proceed to detailed design and construction.

One of our many readers has submitted the suggestion shown above, which they believe could help ease the daily traffic bottleneck in Liberty Square, Thurles. This problem is likely to become even more severe when schools reopen in late August and early September.
Any suggestions from other readers?

Inner Relief Road: The public was informed that the Inner Relief Road may be “ready for construction” in 2027. That wording does not provide a guaranteed completion date. If approvals, design work, procurement and funding continue to slip, there is a genuine danger that construction will not commence before 2030.

Outer Ring Road/Thurles Bypass: The situation surrounding the Outer Ring Road is even more concerning. Mr Michael Lowry has said that the Thurles bypass will advance through design and planning and that he will insist it is “ready for construction in 2030.”
That is not a promise that the road will be built or opened by 2030. The scheme remains at a very early development stage, despite the need for a bypass having been recognised as necessary, some 40 years ago or more.

If the shorter and more advanced Inner Relief Road cannot be brought promptly to construction, how can the public have confidence that the much larger and longer Outer Ring Road will be construction-ready by 2030? The Thurles electorate are not fools.

There must also be accountability for the loss of the historic Great Famine “Double Ditch” at Mill Road. Local heritage campaigners described and proved it to be a famine-era pathway dating from approximately 1846, constructed as relief work for impoverished and starving people and later used as a right of way and Mass path.
Concerns were raised publicly from 2020 onward, that the proposed Inner Relief Road would seriously damage or destroy this locally significant landscape feature. The tragedy now is that part of Thurles’s tangible Famine heritage appears to have been sacrificed for a road that, years later, has still not been delivered. Whatever disagreement may exist about its formal archaeological status, the failure to preserve, commemorate or meaningfully incorporate the “Double Ditch” into the project represents a serious loss to Thurles town’s historical memory.

Meanwhile, HGVs will continue entering Thurles every day. Even after a bypass is eventually constructed, some heavy vehicles will still need to enter the town to supply supermarkets, shops, hotels, restaurants, construction sites and other local businesses. These essential deliveries cannot simply be prohibited.

However, there is an important difference between HGVs that must enter Thurles to supply local businesses and heavy through-traffic that has no business being in the town centre. In the absence of proper alternative routes, both types of traffic continue to use the same narrow medieval streets and junctions.

The council’s own transport planning identifies the effect of through-traffic on Thurles and recognises the need for relief and bypass infrastructure. The Local Transport Plan presents the Inner Relief Road and a town bypass as important elements of the future transport network.

Regrettably, local elected representatives and county councillors have failed to grasp—or act upon—the urgency of this critical issue.

No redesign of Liberty Square can really solve the underlying problem. Wider footpaths, altered parking arrangements, crossings and junction changes may improve the visual appearance and pedestrian environment, but they cannot create a proper alternative route for strategic traffic.

Without the Inner Relief Road and Outer Ring Road, attempts to improve traffic movement in Liberty Square, risk becoming little more than a rearrangement of the same congestion.

Mr Michael Lowry TD and Mr Ryan O’Meara TD must now jointly secure and publish:

► Final Department approval for the Inner Relief Road;
► A fully funded programme for detailed design and construction;
► Firm construction commencement and estimated completion dates;
► Immediate progression of the Outer Ring Road through its formal planning and approval stages;
► An interim HGV-management plan separating essential local deliveries from avoidable through-traffic;
► A permanent memorial or heritage interpretation scheme acknowledging the Great Famine “Double Ditch” and the people whose suffering and labour it represented.

Thurles has already lost an irreplaceable piece of its Famine-era heritage. It must not now be left with neither the historic “Double Ditch” nor the road whose development was used to justify its loss. A plaque of some description must now be constructed recognising its once construction and recent destruction.

Thurles does not need more political celebration of mere preliminary steps, which is all our local politicians have had to offer their electorate over the past 40 years. It needs approvals, funding, contracts, construction and most of all accountability.

Thurles Inner Relief Road: New Tender Documents Raise Serious Questions Over Timelines.

Thurles Inner Relief Road: New Tender Documents Raise Serious Questions Over Timelines, Political Claims and the Destruction of the Great Famine Double Ditch.

The publication of new tender documents for the Thurles Inner Relief Road has been presented as a significant milestone for a long-delayed project. In one sense, it is. After years of promises, updates and political announcements, Tipperary County Council has now gone to the market seeking engineering technical consultancy services to progress the scheme.
But the detail contained in the newly published tender raises serious questions about the true timeline for delivery, the accuracy of previous political claims, and the destruction of the historic Great Famine “Double Ditch”, to facilitate a road that still appears to be years away from completion.

The official eTenders notice, published in July 2026, confirms that Tipperary County Council is seeking a multi-disciplinary technical consultancy team for the Thurles Inner Relief Road. The tender describes the work as including a review of existing documents, completion of outstanding deliverables for Stages 3 and 4, and preparation of deliverables through Stages 5 to 7. Crucially, the official notice gives the contract duration as 50 months.

That single figure changes the entire public understanding of this project.
The proposed road is not simply waiting for diggers to arrive. Tipperary County Council’s own January 2026 management report described the scheme as an approximately 1.1km local link between the N62 and Mill Road, including a signalised junction at Slievenamon Road, a new priority junction with Mill Road, five intermediate access junctions, public lighting, flood alleviation works and a 50-metre tied bowstring arch crossing of the River Suir.

This is a substantial piece of infrastructure, and the new tender shows that major consultancy, design, approval, procurement, construction supervision, handover and defects processes still remain. The public therefore deserves honesty about the timeline.
That honesty is especially important because previous political messaging now appears highly questionable. In November 2025, press reported that Deputy Mr Ryan O’Meara said Minister for Transport Mr Darragh O’Brien expected construction to commence on the Thurles Inner Relief Road the following year;2026. The same report quoted Deputy O’Meara as saying that Department of Transport officials had advised him the project should be completed and opened in approximately 24 months from then.

How does that claim stand beside a 50-month consultancy contract published in July 2026?
If the tender process for the consultancy team is only now underway, and if that consultancy contract itself is expected to run for approximately 50 months, then completion by late 2027 is no longer credible. It is not enough to simply welcome “progress” while ignoring the contradiction. Deputy O’Meara should clarify exactly what he was told, by whom, and on what basis the public was led to believe that the road could be completed and opened in roughly two years.

This matters because Thurles people have heard promises about this project for far too long. Planning permission for the road was granted as far back as 2014, according to earlier press and local radio reporting. More than a decade later, the project is still moving through consultancy and design stages. Local frustration is understandable. But frustration should not be used as a cover for spin.
Nor should the traffic needs of Thurles be used to brush aside the heritage loss already caused by this scheme.

The planned route has been linked for years by local campaigners and heritage advocates to the Great Famine “Double Ditch” at Mill Road. In 2020, Thurles.info publicly asked whether the planned Inner Relief Road would negatively affect what it described as the 1846 Thurles Double Ditch, a right of way and Mass Path associated locally with famine-era history.
The warnings did not stop there. In February 2021, Thurles.info published commentary on an Archaeological Impact Statement, arguing that the proposed road would most likely impinge on the Great Famine Double Ditch in two locations. In March 2021, the same local outlet reported that Cllr Jim Ryan had confirmed the Double Ditch was to be destroyed to construct the Inner Relief Road. This was despite phone denials by Councillor Mr Micheál Lowry of the “Lowry Team”, who readers will remember inquired as to my standing in the community. {☺☺☺}

These are not minor matters. A famine-era pathway, Mass Path or heritage landscape is not just an inconvenience on a drawing. It is part of the physical memory of a town and its people. If warnings were made before destruction occurred, then the question must be asked clearly: why was the Double Ditch not protected, preserved, recorded more fully, or incorporated into the design?

Was every alternative route examined? Was the public given a full explanation? Was the heritage value properly weighed against the road design? Who decided that destruction was acceptable? And why is Thurles now being asked to accept the loss of a historic feature while the road itself may not be complete until around 2030 or later?

Nobody disputes that Thurles needs traffic solutions. The town has long suffered from congestion, poor circulation and pressure on its historic centre. A second river crossing and an improved link between Slievenamon Road and Mill Road may well bring benefits. But infrastructure should not be delivered through vague timelines, political overstatement and irreversible heritage loss. The publication of the new tender documents should therefore be treated as more than a procedural step. It should be treated as a moment of accountability.

Tipperary County Council should publish a clear and realistic delivery programme for the Thurles Inner Relief Road. Deputy Ryan O’Meara should explain the gap between his previously reported 24-month completion claim and the newly published 50-month consultancy timeline. The Council should also account for the treatment of the Great Famine Double Ditch, including what warnings were received, what assessments were carried out, and why destruction was permitted.

Thurles deserves roads. But it also deserves truth. It deserves progress, but not spin. And it deserves development that respects the town’s history rather than erasing it first and explaining later.

Irish Rail Takes High Court Case Against Tipperary County Council.

Irish Rail and Córas Iompair Éireann have brought High Court proceedings against Tipperary County Council in a dispute over a train signalling mast near the old Cahir railway station.

The case centres on whether the mast, located about 130 metres from the old Cahir Rail Station, should be treated as exempted development or whether it affects the setting of a protected structure. The station, described in reports as a Gothic revival railway building dating from the 1850s, is at the heart of the planning disagreement.

Tipperary County Council served an enforcement notice in June 2026 under the Planning and Development Act 2000. That notice requires Irish Rail to cease using and remove the signalling mast by September 2026. Irish Rail is now asking the High Court to quash the council’s decision.

Irish Rail argues that the local authority made errors “in law and in fact” when deciding the mast was not exempted development. It also disputes the council’s view of the “curtilage”; the land or setting attached to a protected structure and says the mast is too far from the station building to fall within that protected area.

The rail operator further says it has installed more than 700 similar masts around Ireland without complaint from other planning authorities. It claims the protected status at the Cahir location now applies only to the station building, rather than other nearby railway structures previously listed in older development plans.

The council’s position is that the mast impacts the character and setting of the historic station. The matter is expected to return before the High Court on July 20th 2026.

Ireland’s Emissions Are Down, But The Road To 2030 Is Getting Steeper.

Ireland’s latest greenhouse gas figures bring a welcome headline: emissions fell again in 2025. But behind that progress lies a much harder truth. The country is still nowhere near the pace of change required to meet its legally binding climate targets, and the next few years are likely to be far more difficult than the last few.

The Environmental Protection Agency’s provisional figures show that Ireland’s greenhouse gas emissions decreased by 2.2% in 2025, equivalent to 1.2 million tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent. It was the fourth year in a row that emissions fell. Reductions were recorded across all main sectors, with the biggest falls in energy industries, buildings, industry and transport.

That is encouraging. It shows that emissions can fall while Ireland’s economy and population continue to grow. It also suggests that policy, investment and cleaner technology are beginning to have an effect.

But the scale of the challenge remains stark. Ireland’s national climate law requires a 51% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions by 2030 compared with 2018 levels. By 2025, emissions had fallen by only 14.5% when land use, land-use change and forestry are included. The EPA has warned that emissions must now fall by more than 10% every year to 2030 if Ireland is to meet its national climate target.

That is the central difficulty. A 2.2% annual fall is progress, but it is not enough. Ireland is moving in the right direction, yet not nearly fast enough.
The easier gains may also be running out. The energy sector has delivered major reductions, helped by renewable electricity, less fossil-fuel generation and changes in the power system. Emissions from power generation and large industrial companies fell by 5.5% in 2025, according to the EPA. But future reductions will increasingly depend on harder-to-change parts of daily life: how people travel, how homes are heated, how farms produce food, how industry uses energy, and how quickly infrastructure can be built.

Transport is one of the biggest warning signs. Emissions fell in 2025, helped by more biofuel use and rising electricity consumption in road transport. But transport still exceeded its sectoral ceiling. This points to a deeper problem: Ireland is making improvements, but car dependency, slow public transport delivery, rising travel demand and freight emissions continue to make transport one of the most difficult sectors to decarbonise.

Industry faces similar pressure. Industrial emissions fell in 2025, but the sector still overshot its ceiling. Some reductions can come from fuel switching or lower fossil-fuel use, but long-term progress will require deeper changes in manufacturing, cement production, industrial heat and investment in cleaner processes. That will not be simple, cheap or quick.

Agriculture remains perhaps the most politically sensitive challenge. The 2025 fall in agricultural emissions was very small. Lower cattle numbers helped, but this was offset by increased fertiliser use and higher milk production. Agriculture is central to rural Ireland and the national economy, but it is also a major source of methane and nitrous oxide. Reducing these emissions at the speed required will involve difficult choices about land use, herd size, fertiliser, food production and farm incomes.

Buildings offer another mixed picture. Emissions fell in 2025, helped by a warmer winter and reduced fossil-fuel use. Residential emissions are now much lower than in previous decades. But warmer weather is not a climate policy. Lasting reductions will require faster retrofitting, more heat pumps, improved energy efficiency, skilled workers and financial supports that make upgrades realistic for households and businesses.

Ireland also faces a serious EU compliance challenge. Under the EU Effort Sharing Regulation, Ireland must reduce emissions in sectors such as agriculture, transport, buildings, waste and smaller industry by 42% by 2030 compared with 2005. The EPA says Ireland is projected to miss that target, with a maximum projected reduction of 23% by 2030 even under a scenario with additional measures.

The cost of missing targets could be significant. Reuters reported that Ireland’s fiscal and climate watchdogs warned the State could face EU compliance costs ranging from €8 billion to €26 billion by 2030, if emissions-reduction plans are not delivered. That means failure would not simply be environmental. It could become a major financial burden on the public purse.
There is a risk that one positive year creates a false sense of security. Falling emissions are welcome, but climate targets are not judged by headlines. They are judged by cumulative reductions, carbon budgets and legally binding limits. Ireland may be provisionally under its first carbon budget, but future budgets will be tighter and harder to meet.

The real test now is delivery. Targets have been set. Carbon budgets have been agreed. Sectoral ceilings have been created. The legal framework is in place. What Ireland needs next is faster implementation; more renewable power, stronger grids, cleaner transport, warmer homes, lower-emission farming, industrial investment and public policies that make low-carbon choices affordable and practical.

Ireland’s emissions are falling. That matters. But the road to 2030 is getting steeper, not easier. The 2025 figures should be welcomed, but they should not be mistaken for success. They are a reminder that progress has begun, and that the hardest work is still ahead.