Public Notice: Proposed Temporary Closure of R659 Holycross–Thurles Road for Watermain Works.
At the end of last month, Tipperary County Council announced plans to temporarily close a section of the R659 road between Holycross and Thurles to facilitate essential water infrastructure works. The proposed closure will run from midnight on Friday, May 29th 2026 until midnight on Friday, July 17th 2026, a period of approximately some seven weeks.
The works are being carried out to enable the installation of a new watermain as part of an upgrade by Uisce Éireann. During the closure, traffic management measures will be put in place, with motorists advised to follow designated diversion routes via surrounding regional roads.
Members of the public are invited to submit objections or representations regarding the proposed closure. Submissions must be made in writing to: Road Closures Section, Roads & Transportation, Tipperary County Council, Civic Offices, Limerick Road, Nenagh, Co. Tipperary, or by e-mail to roadclosures@tipperarycoco.ie
NOTE:All submissions must be received no later than 12:00 noon on Thursday, May 7th 2026.
The council encourages early engagement from residents, businesses, and road users who may be impacted by the proposed works.
A new law to legalise nuclear energy is set to come before the Dáil in the coming months.
On the surface, it is framed as a pragmatic response to high energy prices and climate pressure. But scratch beneath that surface, and what emerges is something far less reassuring; a political system once again flirting with an idea it has repeatedly rejected, often for reasons that remain unresolved.
The Ghost of Chernobyl Still Matters Any serious discussion of nuclear power in Ireland that does not grapple with Chernobyl disaster is either incomplete or deliberately selective. Ireland’s anti-nuclear stance did not appear out of thin air. It was shaped by a combination of domestic protest and global catastrophe. The planned nuclear plant at Carnsore Point, Co. Wexford collapsed not just because of local activism, but because nuclear accidents abroad fundamentally changed public perception.
Chernobyl, forty years on from the events of April 26th, 1986in Russia.
A Pattern of Crisis-Driven Thinking. What is striking about the current proposal is not its novelty, but its timing. Ireland tends to rediscover nuclear energy whenever its energy model comes under stress.
In the 1970s: oil shocks → nuclear proposed. In the 1980s: public backlash + global disasters → nuclear notion abandoned. In the 2020s: energy prices + climate targets → nuclear once again revived.
This is not strategic thinking—it is reactive policymaking. Even today, nuclear power remains explicitly banned under the Electricity Regulation Act 1999. So before any plant is even discussed, the State must first undo decades of settled law; a process that signals just how far removed this proposal is from practical delivery.
The Uncomfortable Contradiction. Supporters often point out that Ireland already imports electricity generated by nuclear power. That is true, and it exposes a possible contradiction in policy. Ireland bans domestic nuclear generation while quietly relying on it through interconnectors. But this argument cuts both ways. If nuclear energy is acceptable when produced elsewhere, why has there been no sustained effort to build domestic capability in the past 25 years? The answer is simple, because when the issue moves from abstraction to implementation, political support tends to evaporate.
The Cost Illusion. There is also a persistent tendency to present nuclear power as an Irish solution to high energy prices. This is, at best, misleading. Modern nuclear projects in Europe have been plagued by delays and spiralling costs. The UK’s Hinkley Point C, for example, has seen its projected cost balloon dramatically over time. For Ireland, a small grid, limited capital capacity, and no nuclear infrastructure; the barriers would be even higher. Even optimistic timelines suggest nuclear would not deliver power for well over a decade. That makes it irrelevant to the current cost-of-living crisis it is being used to attempt justification.
History Has Already Tested This Idea. Ireland did not “miss out” on nuclear power by accident. No it tested the idea thoroughly before rejecting it. The Nuclear Energy Board, established in the 1970s, pursued nuclear development seriously. Plans were advanced, sites selected, and policy aligned. Yet the project ultimately failed due to:-
Public opposition.
Safety concerns amplified by global events.
Overestimation of future energy demand.
These are not trivial footnotes, they are structural barriers. And many of them still exist.
A Debate Without Honesty. What is missing from the current discussion is intellectual honesty. Proponents frame nuclear as:-(1) A solution to high prices. (2) A route to energy independence. (3) A necessary complement to renewables. But they often underplay:- (A) The decade-plus delivery timeline. (B) The multi-billion euro upfront costs. (C) The lack of domestic expertise or infrastructure and (D) Continued public scepticism. Even recent polling shows a divided public, not a mandate for change.
Conclusion: Reopening or Repeating? The upcoming Dáil debate may feel like a turning point, but it risks becoming something more familiar: another cycle of political curiosity followed by practical retreat. Ireland is not debating nuclear energy for the first time, it is revisiting a question it has already answered, under pressure, multiple times. The shadow of Chernobyl still looms, not because the technology hasn’t evolved, but because the political, economic, and societal challenges it exposed were never fully resolved. Until those are addressed directly, rather than sidestepped, the latest push to legalise nuclear energy may prove less a bold new direction, and more a repetition of history.
Community Water Officer Mr Darragh Kelly with LAWPRO (Local Authority Waters Programme) reports:
I am delighted to announce that the 2026 Small Grants & Events Scheme is now open for applications. I attach a copy of the revised 2026 guidelines and also a link HERE to the Small Grants and Events Scheme 2026 portal.
This grant scheme is designed for community groups seeking support for small-scale initiatives and events that fall outside of LAWPRO’s targeted funding calls. It supports activities such as World Wetlands Day, Biodiversity Week, Science Week, and similar events.
Funding may also be used for awareness-raising initiatives including surveys, action plans, citizen science projects, meetings, workshops, litter picks, publications, biodiversity signage, and other small-scale projects.
Note: All applications must demonstrate a clear focus on water quality or water awareness. Please Also Note: This application form must not be used for events taking place during Heritage Week (15th–23rd August 2026). A separate application process for Heritage Week funding will be announced in advance.
Download Guidelines for LAWPRO Small Grants and Events Scheme 2026. → Please ensure you are logged in as a registered user, before you start completing a form. ◘ You must contact your local Community Water Officer before making an application. → Contact details for LAWPRO’s CWOs can be found HERE. ◘ Each application will be assessed based on its merits as it is submitted. → There is no obligation on LAWPRO to request any outstanding or supporting information. ◘ Please read the Guidelines carefully before making an application.
Forty years on from the events of April 26th, 1986, the Chernobyl disaster remains one of the defining catastrophes of the modern age; an event that reshaped attitudes to nuclear power, exposed systemic political failures, and left a human and environmental legacy that endures to this day.
In the early hours of that morning, Reactor 4 at the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant; then part of the Soviet Union, now in Ukraine, exploded during what was supposed to be a routine safety test. A combination of flawed reactor design and critical operator errors triggered a runaway reaction. At 1:23am, the reactor core was blown open, releasing vast quantities of radioactive material into the atmosphere.
Chernobyl, forty years on from the events of April 26th, 1986.
The explosion lit up the night sky above the nearby city of Pripyat, but confusion reigned. Firefighters rushed to the scene believing they were tackling a conventional blaze. In reality, many were exposed to lethal doses of radiation within minutes. In the days that followed, the Soviet authorities delayed evacuation and initially downplayed the scale of the disaster.
The official death toll was listed as just 31, but that figure has long been disputed. Many estimates suggest that tens of thousands, perhaps more, suffered long-term health consequences, including increased cancer rates across Ukraine, Belarus and beyond. Radioactive fallout spread across Europe, carried by wind and weather patterns, reminding the world that nuclear accidents do not respect borders.
Yes, Ireland was affected by Chernobyl, but only lightly, while radioactive fallout did reach the country and caused temporary increases in radiation, the overall impact was limited and far less severe than in areas closer to the disaster. These effects in Ireland were influenced heavily by rainfall. Where it rained, radioactive particles were washed out of the air and deposited onto the land. Some western and northern counties (such as Galway, Mayo and Sligo) saw higher levels because of heavier rain. However, overall contamination levels were much lower than in mainland Europe.
Impact on Irish food and farming. The main concern in Ireland was agriculture, particularly milk and livestock. Low levels of radioactive iodine were detected in milk, though they were far below the extreme levels seen elsewhere in Europe. Some farmland and livestock were contaminated after animals grazed on affected grass. In later years, radioactivity lingered in certain upland sheep, especially in the west and northwest, although it was not considered a major health risk.
Phoenix Yarns, Thurles, now the site of Thurles Shopping centre.
However, it did help to bring about the closure of Phoenix Yarns, here in Thurles. Yarn sold to Russia was paid for by vegetables sent for sale in Belgium from Russia. Vegetables were then no longer acceptable in Europe and sales of yarn to Russia came to an abrupt end.
One of the most remarkable aspects of the disaster was the vast human effort required to contain the disaster. Around 700,000“liquidators” – soldiers, engineers, miners and volunteers, were mobilised to limit the damage. They cleared radioactive debris, built a concrete sarcophagus around the destroyed reactor, and prevented further explosions that could have rendered large parts of Europe uninhabitable. Many paid for this work with their health or their lives.
Beyond the immediate devastation, Chernobyl exposed deeper truths about governance and secrecy. The Soviet system’s reluctance to admit failure contributed to delays that worsened the crisis. The disaster became a symbol of the dangers of suppressing scientific truth in favour of political control; a lesson that continues to resonate in discussions about energy, transparency and environmental risk.
Four decades later, the site itself remains a stark reminder. The surrounding “Exclusion Zone” is still largely uninhabited, though nature has begun to reclaim the area in unexpected ways. Chernobyl has also become a powerful cultural reference point, explored in documentaries, literature and drama.
One of the most acclaimed portrayals is the 2019 television drama Chernobyl, which brought renewed global attention to the disaster. The series dramatizes both the human stories and the systemic failures behind the catastrophe, highlighting the bravery of those who responded and the consequences of misinformation.
Notably, Irish talent played a significant film role in bringing these stories to life. Ms Jessie Buckley portrayed the character of ‘Lyudmilla Ignatenko‘, the wife of a firefighter who was among the first responders. [Film can be viewed currently on SKY GO]. Her performance captured the personal tragedy experienced by families caught in the disaster’s wake. Ms Buckley, who attended the Ursuline Convent in Thurles during her school years, has since become one of Ireland’s most celebrated actors, earning major international awards.
She appeared alongside Barry Keoghanwho played the role of ‘Pavel‘ another central figure in the story, together with Michael McElhatton who played the role of ‘Prosecutor Andrei Stepashin‘; Jared Harris(son of the Limerick-born actor Richard Harris), who played scientist ‘Valery Legasov‘; and Michael Colgan who appeared in the miniseries as ‘Mikhail Shchadov‘; each of their excellent performances helping to humanise a disaster often discussed in abstract terms.
As we mark forty years since Chernobyl, its legacy remains complex. It is a story of technological failure, but also of courage; of political secrecy, but also of truth eventually emerging. Above all, it serves as a warning, about the consequences of ignoring expertise, underestimating risk, and placing ideology above reality.
In remembering Chernobyl, we are not just looking back at history. We are being reminded of responsibilities that remain urgent today.
In 2024, Ireland was compliant with EU Emissions Reduction targets for all five major pollutants: ammonia, non-methane volatile organic compounds, sulphur dioxide, nitrogen oxides and fine particulate matter. Consistent implementation of existing national policies is key to meeting 2030 targets.
Taking the long view, many pollutants have seen significant decreases since the 1990s. Particulate matter, which can have significant impacts on human health, is down by 67 per cent. Pollutants associated with acid rain have also reduced dramatically: sulphur dioxide is down by 96 per cent and nitrogen oxide is down by 67 per cent.
Ammonia emissions, which arise almost entirely from agriculture, remained within EU limits for the third consecutive year.
Reductions in sulphur dioxide, nitrogen oxides and fine particulate matter were largely driven by lower fossil fuel use in power generation and residential heating.
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) today published its assessment of five key air pollutants which impact air quality, health and the environment for 2024.
The pollutants are:
ammonia.
non-methane volatile organic compounds.
sulphur dioxide.
nitrogen oxides.
fine particulate matter.
Agriculture accounts for over 99% of ammonia emissions in Ireland and was previously non-compliant with EU targets in 2020 and 2021. The ongoing adoption of low-emission slurry spreading, in combination with a reduction of dairy cattle and other cattle numbers, has brought ammonia emissions into compliance with the EU Emission Reduction target for the years 2022, 2023 and 2024. This reflects the impact of on-farm adoption of a range of good farming practices.
Commenting on the findings MsRoni Hawe, Director of the EPA’s Office of Evidence and Assessment said: “Ireland is on track to meet its 2030 EU Emissions Reduction targets for all five major air pollutants. The EPA’s assessment confirms that this progress is delivering clear benefits for air quality, human health and sensitive ecosystems, and shows that targeted policies and practical measures are achieving measurable reductions in emissions.”
She added: “Low-emission slurry spreading alone avoided an estimated 8,526 tonnes of ammonia being released to the atmosphere. That’s seven per cent of the national total, making it one of the most effective actions in reducing national ammonia emissions. Continued and wider adoption of these practices is essential to sustain progress on air quality.”
Beyond ammonia, Ireland is in compliance with EU Emission Reduction targets for the other air pollutants. In 2024, Sulphur dioxide decreased by 4.4 per cent; fine particulate matter by 1.9 per cent; nitrogen oxides by 1.3 per cent and non-methane volatile organic compounds by 1.0 per cent. Less fossil fuel use in power generation and residential heating has been key in reducing these emissions.
Commenting on these findings Dr Tomás Murray, Senior Manager of EPA Emissions Statistics said: “This is good news. We can hit our 2030 air pollutant reduction goals if we stay on course with the National Air Pollution Control Programme. By moving away from fossil fuels to generate our electricity and continued adoption of a range of good farming practices, we aren’t just achieving targets but also actively protecting our health and our environment.”
For further details on these figures, see the EPA report Ireland’s Air Pollutant Emissions: Trends and Outlook on the EPA website HERE.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish.AcceptRead More
Privacy & Cookies Policy
Privacy Overview
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
Recent Comments