Archives

Why Early Spring Flowers Are So Often Coloured Yellow.

All Things Bright and Beautiful.
Extract by Childrens Hymn Author:-
Cecil Frances Alexander [ born in Redcross, Co. Wicklow, Ireland, 1818-1895 ].

“All things bright and beautiful, all creatures great and small,
All things wise and wonderful, the Lord God made them all.
Each little flower that opens, each little bird that sings,
He made their glowing colors, He made their tiny wings”
.

Yellow Cytisus scoparius’ commonly called ‘Broom’, so-called because its long stems were often bound together and used to make brushes.

At first glance, the dominance of yellow flowers in early spring might seem like a coincidence. In reality, it is a highly effective evolutionary strategy, shaped by the needs of plants and the behaviour of their pollinators.

Early spring presents a challenging environment for both plants and insects. Temperatures fluctuate unpredictably, with warm spells followed by sudden cold snaps and frost. Sunlight remains inconsistent, and many pollinating insects, such as bees, are only just emerging after winter dormancy.
Their energy reserves are low, and they must quickly find reliable food sources to survive. For flowering plants, this creates a narrow window of opportunity, for they must attract pollinators efficiently and stand out in a landscape that is still largely dull and colourless.

A key factor in this strategy lies in how insects perceive the world. Human vision is based on three primary colours; red, blue, and green, but many pollinators see a different spectrum. Bees, for example, are sensitive to ultraviolet (UV), blue, and green wavelengths, but they cannot perceive red in the same way humans do. Within this visual system, yellow appears especially vivid and highly detectable. It occupies a central position in the range of colours insects can see, making it one of the most noticeable signals a flower can display.

Beyond simple visibility, yellow flowers often have another advantage, they reflect ultraviolet light in distinctive patterns. While these UV markings are invisible to humans, they act as visual guides for pollinators. Sometimes referred to as “nectar guides”, these patterns effectively direct insects toward the centre of the flower, where pollen and nectar are located. This increases the efficiency of pollination, benefiting both the insect and the plant itself.

Temperature is another critical factor in early spring, and yellow flowers offer an advantage here as well. Their pigmentation and structure can help absorb and retain heat from available sunlight. In some cases, the interior of a yellow flower can be a few degrees warmer than the surrounding air. For cold, energy-depleted insects, this slight increase in temperature can make a meaningful difference. A warmer flower provides not only food but also a place to briefly conserve energy and raise body temperature, allowing insects to remain active in otherwise challenging conditions.

In addition, the broader environment, during early spring, enhances the effectiveness of yellow. The landscape is often dominated by muted tones, e.g browns, greys, and dull greens, left over from winter. Against this subdued background, bright yellow flowers create a strong visual contrast, making them even easier for pollinators to locate from a distance.

Taken together, these factors explain why yellow is so prevalent among early-blooming flowers. It is not merely an aesthetic choice, but a refined adaptation that maximises visibility, guides pollinators efficiently, and even provides a small thermal benefit. By aligning their characteristics with the sensory abilities and needs of insects, these flowers improve their chances of successful pollination at a time of year when conditions here in Ireland and elsewhere are far from ideal.

Closure Of R659 Holycross To Thurles Road.

Public Notice: Proposed Temporary Closure of R659 Holycross–Thurles Road for Watermain Works.

At the end of last month, Tipperary County Council announced plans to temporarily close a section of the R659 road between Holycross and Thurles to facilitate essential water infrastructure works.
The proposed closure will run from midnight on Friday, May 29th 2026 until midnight on Friday, July 17th 2026, a period of approximately some seven weeks.

The works are being carried out to enable the installation of a new watermain as part of an upgrade by Uisce Éireann.
During the closure, traffic management measures will be put in place, with motorists advised to follow designated diversion routes via surrounding regional roads.

Members of the public are invited to submit objections or representations regarding the proposed closure. Submissions must be made in writing to: Road Closures Section, Roads & Transportation, Tipperary County Council, Civic Offices, Limerick Road, Nenagh, Co. Tipperary, or by e-mail to roadclosures@tipperarycoco.ie

NOTE: All submissions must be received no later than 12:00 noon on Thursday, May 7th 2026.

The council encourages early engagement from residents, businesses, and road users who may be impacted by the proposed works.

Chernobyl Shadows & Political Amnesia -Ireland’s Nuclear Debate Set To Return.

A new law to legalise nuclear energy is set to come before the Dáil in the coming months.

On the surface, it is framed as a pragmatic response to high energy prices and climate pressure. But scratch beneath that surface, and what emerges is something far less reassuring; a political system once again flirting with an idea it has repeatedly rejected, often for reasons that remain unresolved.

The Ghost of Chernobyl Still Matters
Any serious discussion of nuclear power in Ireland that does not grapple with Chernobyl disaster is either incomplete or deliberately selective.
Ireland’s anti-nuclear stance did not appear out of thin air. It was shaped by a combination of domestic protest and global catastrophe. The planned nuclear plant at Carnsore Point, Co. Wexford collapsed not just because of local activism, but because nuclear accidents abroad fundamentally changed public perception.

Chernobyl, forty years on from the events of April 26th, 1986 in Russia.

Chernobyl turned nuclear energy from a technical question into a moral one. It cemented a widespread belief that the risks, however statistically small, were politically unacceptable. That legacy still lingers, even if proponents now prefer to speak as though it belongs to a “different era.”

A Pattern of Crisis-Driven Thinking.
What is striking about the current proposal is not its novelty, but its timing. Ireland tends to rediscover nuclear energy whenever its energy model comes under stress.

In the 1970s: oil shocks nuclear proposed.
In the 1980s: public backlash + global disasters
nuclear notion abandoned.
In the 2020s: energy prices + climate targets nuclear once again revived
.

This is not strategic thinking—it is reactive policymaking.
Even today, nuclear power remains explicitly banned under the Electricity Regulation Act 1999.
So before any plant is even discussed, the State must first undo decades of settled law; a process that signals just how far removed this proposal is from practical delivery.

The Uncomfortable Contradiction.
Supporters often point out that Ireland already imports electricity generated by nuclear power. That is true, and it exposes a possible contradiction in policy. Ireland bans domestic nuclear generation while quietly relying on it through interconnectors.
But this argument cuts both ways. If nuclear energy is acceptable when produced elsewhere, why has there been no sustained effort to build domestic capability in the past 25 years?
The answer is simple, because when the issue moves from abstraction to implementation, political support tends to evaporate.

The Cost Illusion.
There is also a persistent tendency to present nuclear power as an Irish solution to high energy prices. This is, at best, misleading.
Modern nuclear projects in Europe have been plagued by delays and spiralling costs. The UK’s Hinkley Point C, for example, has seen its projected cost balloon dramatically over time.
For Ireland, a small grid, limited capital capacity, and no nuclear infrastructure; the barriers would be even higher. Even optimistic timelines suggest nuclear would not deliver power for well over a decade. That makes it irrelevant to the current cost-of-living crisis it is being used to attempt justification.

History Has Already Tested This Idea.
Ireland did not “miss out” on nuclear power by accident. No it tested the idea thoroughly before rejecting it.
The Nuclear Energy Board, established in the 1970s, pursued nuclear development seriously. Plans were advanced, sites selected, and policy aligned.
Yet the project ultimately failed due to:-

  • Public opposition.
  • Safety concerns amplified by global events.
  • Overestimation of future energy demand.

These are not trivial footnotes, they are structural barriers. And many of them still exist.

A Debate Without Honesty.
What is missing from the current discussion is intellectual honesty.
Proponents frame nuclear as:- (1) A solution to high prices. (2) A route to energy independence. (3) A necessary complement to renewables.
But they often underplay:- (A) The decade-plus delivery timeline. (B) The multi-billion euro upfront costs.
(C) The lack of domestic expertise or infrastructure and (D) Continued public scepticism.
Even recent polling shows a divided public, not a mandate for change.

Conclusion: Reopening or Repeating?
The upcoming Dáil debate may feel like a turning point, but it risks becoming something more familiar: another cycle of political curiosity followed by practical retreat.
Ireland is not debating nuclear energy for the first time, it is revisiting a question it has already answered, under pressure, multiple times.
The shadow of Chernobyl still looms, not because the technology hasn’t evolved, but because the political, economic, and societal challenges it exposed were never fully resolved.
Until those are addressed directly, rather than sidestepped, the latest push to legalise nuclear energy may prove less a bold new direction, and more a repetition of history.

LAWPRO Small Grants And Events Scheme 2026 – Overview.

Community Water Officer Mr Darragh Kelly with LAWPRO (Local Authority Waters Programme) reports:

I am delighted to announce that the 2026 Small Grants & Events Scheme is now open for applications.
I attach a copy of the revised 2026 guidelines and also a link HERE to the Small Grants and Events Scheme 2026 portal.

This grant scheme is designed for community groups seeking support for small-scale initiatives and events that fall outside of LAWPRO’s targeted funding calls. It supports activities such as World Wetlands Day, Biodiversity Week, Science Week, and similar events.

Funding may also be used for awareness-raising initiatives including surveys, action plans, citizen science projects, meetings, workshops, litter picks, publications, biodiversity signage, and other small-scale projects.

Note: All applications must demonstrate a clear focus on water quality or water awareness.
Please Also Note: This application form must not be used for events taking place during Heritage Week (15th–23rd August 2026). A separate application process for Heritage Week funding will be announced in advance.

Download Guidelines for LAWPRO Small Grants and Events Scheme 2026.
Please ensure you are logged in as a registered user, before you start completing a form.
You must contact your local Community Water Officer before making an application.
Contact details for LAWPRO’s CWOs can be found HERE.
Each application will be assessed based on its merits as it is submitted.
There is no obligation on LAWPRO to request any outstanding or supporting information.
Please read the Guidelines carefully before making an application.

Chernobyl at 40: A Nuclear Legacy & The Thurles, Co. Tipperary Connection Through Film.

Forty years on from the events of April 26th, 1986, the Chernobyl disaster remains one of the defining catastrophes of the modern age; an event that reshaped attitudes to nuclear power, exposed systemic political failures, and left a human and environmental legacy that endures to this day.

In the early hours of that morning, Reactor 4 at the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant; then part of the Soviet Union, now in Ukraine, exploded during what was supposed to be a routine safety test. A combination of flawed reactor design and critical operator errors triggered a runaway reaction. At 1:23am, the reactor core was blown open, releasing vast quantities of radioactive material into the atmosphere.

Chernobyl, forty years on from the events of April 26th, 1986.

The explosion lit up the night sky above the nearby city of Pripyat, but confusion reigned. Firefighters rushed to the scene believing they were tackling a conventional blaze. In reality, many were exposed to lethal doses of radiation within minutes. In the days that followed, the Soviet authorities delayed evacuation and initially downplayed the scale of the disaster.

The official death toll was listed as just 31, but that figure has long been disputed. Many estimates suggest that tens of thousands, perhaps more, suffered long-term health consequences, including increased cancer rates across Ukraine, Belarus and beyond. Radioactive fallout spread across Europe, carried by wind and weather patterns, reminding the world that nuclear accidents do not respect borders.

Yes, Ireland was affected by Chernobyl, but only lightly, while radioactive fallout did reach the country and caused temporary increases in radiation, the overall impact was limited and far less severe than in areas closer to the disaster. These effects in Ireland were influenced heavily by rainfall. Where it rained, radioactive particles were washed out of the air and deposited onto the land.
Some western and northern counties (such as Galway, Mayo and Sligo) saw higher levels because of heavier rain. However, overall contamination levels were much lower than in mainland Europe.

Impact on Irish food and farming.
The main concern in Ireland was agriculture, particularly milk and livestock. Low levels of radioactive iodine were detected in milk, though they were far below the extreme levels seen elsewhere in Europe.
Some farmland and livestock were contaminated after animals grazed on affected grass. In later years, radioactivity lingered in certain upland sheep, especially in the west and northwest, although it was not considered a major health risk.

Phoenix Yarns, Thurles, now the site of Thurles Shopping centre.

However, it did help to bring about the closure of Phoenix Yarns, here in Thurles. Yarn sold to Russia was paid for by vegetables sent for sale in Belgium from Russia. Vegetables were then no longer acceptable in Europe and sales of yarn to Russia came to an abrupt end.

One of the most remarkable aspects of the disaster was the vast human effort required to contain the disaster. Around 700,000“liquidators” – soldiers, engineers, miners and volunteers, were mobilised to limit the damage. They cleared radioactive debris, built a concrete sarcophagus around the destroyed reactor, and prevented further explosions that could have rendered large parts of Europe uninhabitable. Many paid for this work with their health or their lives.

Beyond the immediate devastation, Chernobyl exposed deeper truths about governance and secrecy. The Soviet system’s reluctance to admit failure contributed to delays that worsened the crisis. The disaster became a symbol of the dangers of suppressing scientific truth in favour of political control; a lesson that continues to resonate in discussions about energy, transparency and environmental risk.

Four decades later, the site itself remains a stark reminder. The surrounding “Exclusion Zone” is still largely uninhabited, though nature has begun to reclaim the area in unexpected ways. Chernobyl has also become a powerful cultural reference point, explored in documentaries, literature and drama.

One of the most acclaimed portrayals is the 2019 television drama Chernobyl, which brought renewed global attention to the disaster. The series dramatizes both the human stories and the systemic failures behind the catastrophe, highlighting the bravery of those who responded and the consequences of misinformation.

Notably, Irish talent played a significant film role in bringing these stories to life. Ms Jessie Buckley portrayed the character of ‘Lyudmilla Ignatenko‘, the wife of a firefighter who was among the first responders. [Film can be viewed currently on SKY GO]. Her performance captured the personal tragedy experienced by families caught in the disaster’s wake. Ms Buckley, who attended the Ursuline Convent in Thurles during her school years, has since become one of Ireland’s most celebrated actors, earning major international awards.

She appeared alongside Barry Keoghan who played the role of ‘Pavel‘ another central figure in the story, together with Michael McElhatton who played the role of ‘Prosecutor Andrei Stepashin‘; Jared Harris (son of the Limerick-born actor Richard Harris), who played scientist ‘Valery Legasov‘; and Michael Colgan who appeared in the miniseries as ‘Mikhail Shchadov‘; each of their excellent performances helping to humanise a disaster often discussed in abstract terms.

As we mark forty years since Chernobyl, its legacy remains complex. It is a story of technological failure, but also of courage; of political secrecy, but also of truth eventually emerging. Above all, it serves as a warning, about the consequences of ignoring expertise, underestimating risk, and placing ideology above reality.

In remembering Chernobyl, we are not just looking back at history. We are being reminded of responsibilities that remain urgent today.