Landmark US case seen as “a warning shot” for Ireland and EU food policy.
Earlier this month, the European Commission has recalled consignments of frozen Brazilian beef products imported into the EU, after it was found they contained hormones banned by the bloc. The banned hormones were detected in shipments that arrived into Europe earlier this month.
Co. Tipperary and Irish public health advocates are calling on the Government and EU institutions to accelerate action on ultra-processed foods (UPFs), following a landmark lawsuit filed this week, by the City of San Francisco against some of the world’s biggest food manufacturers.
And now, a case, taken by San Francisco; the first of its kind brought by a public authority, alleges that companies including Coca-Cola, PepsiCo, Kraft Heinz, Nestlé and others engineered and aggressively marketed ultra-processed products while knowing they were driving a crisis in obesity and chronic disease, in breach of unfair competition and public nuisance laws.
Ultra-Processed Meat.
Various groups promoting healthy diets in Ireland claim that the lawsuit should be “a wake-up call” for Ireland, where research shows ultra-processed foods account for around 45.9% of the average household shopping basket, placing the Irish State in line with the highest consumers in Europe.
What San Francisco is saying, very clearly, is that this is not just about individual willpower, it’s about products and marketing strategies that put profit before people’s health.
Ireland has one of the highest levels of overweight and obesity in Europe. We cannot ignore the role of an increasingly ultra-processed food environment in that picture.
According to the HSE and recent national surveys, around 60% of Irish adults and over one in five children are now living with overweight or obesity.
The San Francisco lawsuit draws heavily on emerging international evidence, including a major Lancet series published last month, which found consistent associations between high UPF intake and increased risks of obesity, type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, some cancers, depression and premature death.
The message is that ultra-processed foods are not just empty calories, they are strongly linked with chronic disease across multiple organ systems. Ireland cannot afford to be a bystander while other jurisdictions start to hold industry to account.
While Ireland has introduced measures such as the sugar-sweetened drinks tax and restrictions on marketing high-fat, salt and sugar (HFSS) foods to children, the various groups promoting healthy diets, note that current rules focus mainly on nutrients, not on the degree of processing or the cumulative impact of additives, texture engineering and aggressive branding.
At EU level, the Farm to Fork Strategy includes a commitment to a harmonised, mandatory front-of-pack nutrition label and stronger nutrient profiles to restrict health and nutrition claims on unhealthy products. However, progress has been slow and does not yet directly address ultra-processing as such.
Various groups promoting healthy diets are urging the Irish Government to:
Back strong EU-wide front-of-pack labelling that is easy to understand and compatible with emerging evidence on UPFs;
Tighten marketing rules, particularly digital advertising and brand promotions aimed at children, to cover ultra-processed categories rather than just narrow nutrient thresholds;
Set clear procurement standards so that publicly funded schemes – including school meals, hospitals and other State services – progressively move away from serving ultra-processed products as default options;
Monitor and report the proportion of the Irish food supply and advertising spend accounted for by ultra-processed products.
Ireland now needs to recognise the same underlying problem: a food system where the cheapest, most available and most heavily promoted options are the very products most closely linked with long-term illness.
People in Ireland now has a choice, to wait and react, or to lead in protecting people’s health.
€1.5m will be made available to 37 NGOs and community organisations to progress projects to combat racism and promote racial equality and community cohesion.
Successful organisations will receive grants of up to €100,000 and will fund a range of projects from promoting employability, to educational supports and training needs as well as a range of community based initiatives.
The fund is key part of the National Action Plan Against Racism.
The Irish Government, today, announced €1.5m will be made available to 37 NGOs and community organisations to progress projects to combat racism and promote racial equality and community cohesion.
Successful organisations will receive grants of up to €100,000 and will fund a range of projects from promoting employability, to educational supports and training needs as well as a range of community based initiatives.
The 2025 Ireland Against Racism Fund for proposals ran from 16th July 2025 – 27th August 2025. €1,539,234 has been made available in 2025 to support anti-racism projects through grant funding of €40,000 – €100,000 per successful Scheme A project and €5,000 – €10,000 per successful Scheme B project.
Tipperary features in the Successful Scheme B projects:
Organisation Name:
Project Name:
Amount Awarded:
Geographical Scope:
Waterford Integration Services (WIS)
A Future Without Bias: Youth Convention on Combating Racism Through AI & VR applications
€10,000
Carlow, Kilkenny, Tipperary, Waterford & Wexford
The fund is key part of the National Action Plan Against Racism today announced the 37 projects set to receive over €1.5m in funding under the Ireland Against Racism Fund 2025.
The Fund enables non-government and community organisations to provide national and regional projects and local initiatives that combat racism and promote racial equality.
A number of successful organisations will use the funding to deliver promotional campaigns in the community, including in schools and youth groups, about how to tackle racism and discrimination. Organisations will also use the funding to provide training to staff and initiatives focusing on increasing the skills and employability of migrants.
The Fund is a key part of the National Action Plan Against Racism (NAPAR) which was informed by the experiences of people who have been directly affected by racism.
Next Tuesday, 9th December 2025, at 6.30pm Cashel Library are delighted to host a Book Launch of ‘My Hidden Me’, by local woman Ms Margaret O’Donnell and illustrated beautifully by Ms Majella Ryan.
Wine & Nibbles reception at 6.30pm sharp will be followed by the book launch and all welcome to attend.
Ms Margaret O’Donnell has stated. “I live in the Golden Vale of Tipperary. I have loved putting this book together. I’ve finally found the courage to set my hidden me free with my poetry. I hope my words helps the reader to set their hidden me free too.”
Visitors attending this event can locate the Cashel Library building; situated on Friar Street, Lady’s Well, Cashel, Co. Tipperary, HERE. (Eircode E25 K798).
As influenza activity continues to climb across Ireland, the HSE is calling on eligible members of the public to get their flu vaccine now, before cases escalate further.
Recent data from the Health Protection Surveillance Centre (HPSC) shows that influenza activity rose in week 44 of 2025, with the highest number of cases so far among adults aged 65 years and older. Hospitalisations have also increased. Multiple strains, A(H3), A(H1)pdm09 and influenza B, have already been detected this season.
Local hospitals, including Tipperary University Hospital, and Limerick University Hospital, are under heavy pressure, with Emergency Departments experiencing large numbers of people presenting. As a result, many hospitals have introduced visitor restrictions to help manage the rise in flu cases.
With flu cases rising sharply, the vaccine remains the safest and most effective way to protect yourself, your family, and the wider community. Speaking to Liberty Pharmacy(Prop: Kate Kennedy) this morning, (Premises situated at No. 34 Lower Liberty Square, Thurles, Co. TipperaryTel: 0504 90604), their spokesperson stated, “We continue to have appointments available and now is the time to act, while the vaccine is still readily accessible.”
Keep in mind: Vaccination is free under the national programme for people aged 60 and over, children aged 2–17, pregnant women, health-care workers, carers, household contacts of people at higher risk, residents of long-stay facilities, and those with certain health conditions or regular contact with poultry, waterfowl or pigs.
Getting vaccinated helps prevent serious illness — and helps protect those around you.
The proposal to strip Herzog Park of its name is more than a routine motion before Dublin City Council. It is a gesture that cuts directly across Ireland’s own history, its values, and its long, if now fading, relationship with our Jewish community.
An Taoiseach Mr Micheál Martin was right to call this proposal “divisive and wrong”. It is exactly that. To remove the Herzog name is to erase a story woven deeply into the fabric of the Irish State: a story of solidarity, shared struggle, and the willingness of a small minority community to stand with Ireland, before Irish independence was secure.
LateRabbi Yitzhak Halevi Herzog. (1888–1959)
Chaim Herzog’s father, Rabbi Yitzhak Halevi Herzog, took his place beside the first Dáil at a moment when such an act carried real personal risk. He did not choose silence or obscurity. Instead, he offered his leadership, his scholarship, and his friendship to a fledgling nation then struggling to define itself.
In the decades that followed, Rabbi Herzog built an unlikely, but enduring, relationship with Éamon de Valera. He learned Irish, advised during the drafting of the 1937 Irish Constitution, and ensured that the Jewish community, then facing existential threat elsewhere in Europe, was explicitly protected in our founding document. De Valera himself regarded this protection as essential.
Removing the Herzog name now shows little regard for that legacy. It risks signalling that Irish memory is selective, and that contributions made by minorities count only until the political winds shift.
The forest of 10,000 trees planted in Israel in 1965 in de Valera’s honour was intended as a lasting symbol of mutual respect. Today, that symbol stands in stark contrast to a relationship that has deteriorated to the point where the Israeli Embassy has closed its doors in Dublin. Ireland’s foreign policy in recent years has been shaped by new pressures, shifting alliances, and at times, an eagerness to move with global trends rather than stand firmly in the centre.
The debate over Herzog Park is symptomatic of something deeper: a narrowing of historical perspective. In the heat of present-day geopolitical tensions, there is a temptation to reduce Ireland’s stance to simple binaries, solidarity with one cause, with condemnation of another. But this neglects the complexities of our own past, including the violence we once justified in the name of liberation. The Good Friday Agreement may have delivered peace, but it also allowed a form of civic amnesia to settle in. We remember heroics; we forget those who suffered outside the story we prefer to tell.
It is easy to brandish the language of liberation and resistance. It is harder to honour the quieter, older stories, like that of the Herzogs, who stood with Ireland not for applause or advantage, but because it was right.
Contemporary Political Climate. Renaming Herzog Park would say far more about today’s Ireland than about its past. It would suggest a willingness to discard historical nuance, to minimise minority contributions, and to allow contemporary tensions to override long-established bonds.
The proposal should be immediately withdrawn. Not as a favour to one community, but as an affirmation of Ireland’s own basic integrity, its commitment to remembering fairly, honouring generously, and resisting the pull of easy revisionism by those foolishly elected individuals, each with little knowledge or understanding of our rich Irish history. Ireland’s political landscape has been increasingly influenced by global tensions, including heightened pro-Palestinian activism by in particular Fine Gael. Critics warn that the Irish State has risked aligning itself with more extreme elements, even as it seeks to preserve long standing international relationships, including its strategic ties with the United States.
However, there are statutory safeguards and restrictions already in place. Name changes require formal procedures, not ad-hoc renaming. While there isn’t a blanket ban on changing Irish place names, there are laws which regulate and restrict how name changes can happen.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish.AcceptRead More
Privacy & Cookies Policy
Privacy Overview
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
Recent Comments