Archives

A Letter To Government From The People Of Tipperary

Dear Esteemed Voices of Opposition in Government. (Yes, you lot).

We, the People of Tipperary (yes, that rag-tag, unwashed mob, who struggle to pay the rent, mind the children, endure freezing radiators and fruitless housing-hunts), write to you today with admiration.

Oh yes, you have mastered something truly impressive: the art of being perpetually angry and outraged, heroically indignant and spectacularly unhelpful. (Bravo, Three Cheers, Hip, Hip, Hooray).

You stand there in the Dáil, gesturing grandly, as though you are the last defenders of Irish morality and justice, and the nation watches on, in overwhelming fear and general anxiety, before wondering what the hell exactly were you offering yet again?

Our Civic Palace of Stone & Voice.

Awe-inspiring words (volume high, content light).
Your speeches soar with righteous anger. You denounce, you condemn, you rail against government failures. You paint bleak pictures of homelessness, cost-of-living, neglect, inequality. You raise the volume, you draw the cameras, you craft the headlines and welcome criminals into our Ardeaglais na nDlíthe (Cathedral / High Church of Laws), our Civic Palace of Stone and Voice, our People’s Drawing-Room, better known as Leinster House.

Yet, when the press lights dim and the papers close, the problems remain. Those health waiting lists grow – the rents continue to climb – the vacant units and houses stay vacant and deteriorate – and the young people we highly educate for free simply emigrate to the benefit of other states.

Is this your grand plan? A master-class in rhetorical fury, without a blueprint, without a map, without wheels that actually roll.

No plan, no policy, just performance
You accuse the Government of failure, and indeed with some justice. But then: what is your remedy?
You hand us soundbites, slogans, finger-pointing. You hand us anger and outrage. You do not hand us homes. You do not hand many people peace of mind.
If politics is a fire, you seem to delight in fanning flames of indignation, but offer no water, no ladder, no shovel to dig foundations to rebuild what has burned.

Procedure over purpose.
You treat parliamentary procedure like a stage for drama. Adjournments, speaking-rights rows, stand-off’s, delicious theatre. Critics dare to call it “chaos.” Some might even call it an embarrassment. But to you, it’s perfect. Because nothing says “principled opposition” like disruption for disruption’s sake.
You trumpet this as integrity. We hear the loud banging and the unconstructive silence that follows those bangs.

Then amongst the so called Independents; those great parliamentary wallflowers who would sooner walk barefoot across hot coals than appear in a live television debate. They know full well that the moment they open their mouths without a script, the entire country would witness the intellectual equivalent of a slow-motion car crash. So instead, they clutch their pre-written sheets, like a toddler clings to a comfort blanket, lift them up with trembling hands; while attempting to read aloud words they clearly had only encountered for the first time, just moments earlier.

What follows is a linguistic bloodbath: mispronounced names, mangled terminology, long pauses where they glare at the page as if the letters are rearranging themselves out of spite. They stutter, they stumble, they sweat, like someone trying to defuse a bomb using only phonics. It becomes obvious that the speech wasn’t written for them, so much as in spite of them. By the time they reach the end, the chamber is left wondering not what point they were trying to make, but how such a person was ever trusted with a microphone, a mandate, or indeed the ability to read aloud in public.
These today are, allegedly, our lawmakers. God help us.

And then, of course, we have the Opposition’s “Elder States People” Sinn Féin, those political veterans who behave as though their entire past was spent rescuing kittens from trees and mentoring youth choirs, rather than, whatever it was they were actually doing. Their official biographies glide gracefully from birth to present day, skipping over entire decades the way a dodgy landlord skips over mentioning mould in a rental advert.

These are the same people who now lecture the public about peace, ethics and moral leadership, while hoping no one ever dusts off the old photo albums from their glory days, which saw them remembered for blowing things up with great enthusiasm and who involved themselves in robbing banks and home grown genocide.

Listening to them now; polished, pious, freshly laundered, you’d swear they spent the 1980s running charity bake sales rather than attending strategy meetings in windowless rooms, lit by a single flickering candle. Their reinventions are so dramatic they make witness protection programmes look lazy.

And yet, with straight faces and quivering angry indignation, they condemn everyone else for moral failings. It would be funny if it weren’t so magnificently ridiculous, a whole troupe of reformed revolutionaries pretending their pasts were nothing more than a misunderstanding, involving fireworks and enthusiastic landscaping.

The people, now weary, watch from the sidelines.
We are tired; not of the problems, no we cannot afford that luxury. We are tired of the show. We are tired of the endless promises of change, if only the Government is shamed enough. Shame. Shame again, and then, nothing.

We, the salary payers, used to believe that opposition was a safeguard: a watchdog, a conscience, a balance. Now, increasingly, we suspect it’s become a puppet-show, put on for the people, yes, your employers, who are now a jaded audience.

What we the people would like you to remember:

  • If you believe there is a crisis, propose a fix, not just an angry rant.
  • If you object to the way things are run, say how you would run them, not just why they are wrong.
  • If you seek to hold power accountable, do so without turning every debate into a circus. Clarity beats chaos.
  • And finally; remember those of us who don’t work a 3 day week outside of Leinster House. The ones who count the days until payday, who worry where the next rent cheque will come from, who wonder if home will ever mean more than a roof and attempt to give us hope.

Without hope, loud speeches become hollow noise, and parliament becomes a theatre of shadows.

Yours sincerely,
We, the People of Tipperary,
(tired of the Drama, longing for Delivery).

Thurles Businesses & Parish Alarmed At Munster Hotel Car Park Closure.

Thurles businesses and parish alarmed, as Munster Hotel car park in Thurles, faces closure, yet again, with effect from 1st December, 2025.

The decision to close the car park, situated beside the former Munster Hotel, yet again, on December 1st next, 2025, has sparked deep concern and outrage among local business owners, churchgoers, and the wider Thurles community.
What was once a lifeline for retailers, consumers, parishioners and school-bus users, east of the town is now threatened, just as the town prepares for its busiest season of the year.

Former Munster Hotel car park threatened with closure on December 1st next, 2025.

A Blow To Faith, Commerce and Community.
The car park’s closure will leave attendees at Thurles Cathedral, for Masses, funerals, and other important rites, struggling to find parking, creating potential hazards and serious access issues.
Small local businesses, already feeling the strain from limited footfall, now fear a catastrophic drop in trade at the worst possible time: the run-up to Christmas.
With the Thurles Market Quarter car park still closed for over a year and ‘The Source’ building car park closed for nearly three years, the looming loss of this space could be a tipping point.

Public car parking spots on Kickham Street reallocated to school bus services.

Shockingly, in what many see as “salt in the wound”, a number of previously public parking spots on Kickham Street, have recently been reallocated, without prior notice, to school bus services.

Ownership, Influence And Frustration:
The Munster Hotel and its adjoining car park are understood to be owned by Mr. Martin Healy, a high-profile local businessperson and a former member of the Thurles Chamber of Commerce, latter the very organisation that is tasked in promoting entrepreneurship and supporting small enterprises in the town.
The irony is not lost therefore on local small business owners: the private owner closing a facility that is absolutely vital to the community.

The car park is currently rented by Tipperary County Council, but unconfirmed reports suggest that lease negotiations have broken down, fuelling accusations of neglect and mismanagement.

A Town On The Brink:
Many in Thurles are now asking: how much more can local businesses absorb? How many more loyal customers will be lost because they simply cannot find a spot to park? And what message does this send when, at a time when the town should be rallying together, its own infrastructure fails exactly those who need it most?
The impending closure will also likely expose pedestrians and road-users to increasing risk. With school buses now allocated to street parking, and the Cathedral’s forecourt full, the potential for dangerous traffic congestion is all too real.

Businesses Call For Immediate Action:
Tipperary County Council must urgently intervene. This car park is not just a private asset; it is a public necessity.
Thurles Chamber of Commerce must reflect on its role: supporting small businesses means protecting their lifelines, not shutting them off.
Local elected representatives and stakeholders must demand a rapid, transparent solution that ensures parking is available for parishioners, shoppers, and visitors, especially during this Christmas season.

Conclusion:
This is more than a car park dispute. This is a story of a town’s heartbeat being squeezed: of faith, community, and commerce, all now under threat. With the Munster Hotel itself long derelict, the parking facility has become more than a convenience, it is a cornerstone of Thurles daily life.

Its closure cannot be allowed to be yet another casualty of short-term thinking.

FAI Moves To Seek UEFA Ban On Israel.

Questions Raised Over Motivation and Governance.

The Football Association of Ireland (FAI) has voted overwhelmingly to submit a motion to UEFA calling for the suspension of the Israel Football Association (IFA) from European football competitions.

The motion, passed by 74 votes to 7 with 2 abstentions, was adopted at an extraordinary general meeting of the FAI. It urges UEFA to remove Israel from participation in club and international competitions, citing alleged breaches of football governance and human rights obligations.

Grounds for the Motion:
The proposal contends that the Israel Football Association:

  • Operates clubs in illegal settlements in the occupied West Bank, without the consent of the Palestinian Football Association — said to breach UEFA and FIFA statutes.
  • Has failed to uphold UEFA’s anti-racism and equality policies, contrary to Article 7bis of the UEFA Statutes.
  • UEFA has already decided that no European competition matches can take place in Israel due to ongoing security concerns. However, the FAI motion goes further, seeking to completely suspend Israel from all UEFA competitions.

Next Steps and Potential Outcomes:
The FAI’s motion will now be transmitted to UEFA, where it may be considered by the organisation’s Executive Committee or Congress.

If acted upon, the suspension could see:

  • Israeli clubs removed from the Champions League, Europa League, and Conference League.
  • The Israeli national team barred from European Championship and World Cup qualifying campaigns conducted under UEFA.

No formal timetable for discussion or decision has been announced by UEFA.

Potential Consequences
Analysts warn that the move could have wide-ranging implications:
Sporting disruption: Fixtures involving Israeli clubs or national sides could be cancelled or restructured.
Legal risk: The Israel Football Association could challenge any suspension before the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS), arguing that it is politically motivated.
Diplomatic impact: UEFA could face political and commercial pressure from member governments and sponsors.
Precedent: A ban on Israel could prompt demands for similar action in other politically charged situations, raising questions about consistency and governance in sport.
Financial Context: – FAI’s Dependence on State Support.

This debate comes as the FAI continues to rely heavily on Irish Government and UEFA financial assistance.

In January 2020, the State, UEFA and Bank of Ireland agreed a €30 million rescue package to save the FAI from insolvency. This included €20 million in taxpayer funding through Irish government loans and grants.

In October 2025, the Government confirmed a further €3 million allocation in Budget 2026; same to support the development of League of Ireland academies.

This financial dependency has led some observers to ask who exactly initiated or influenced the FAI’s extraordinary meeting and subsequent vote and whether the association consulted adequately with its funding partners before taking a political position of such scale.

Broader Questions: While many within Irish football support calls for greater international accountability, others caution that the FAI, still emerging from years of financial crisis and governance reform, must act with care to avoid drawing itself into complex geopolitical disputes.

As UEFA weighs its response, the move has sparked debate not only about Israel’s role in European football, but also about the role of the Irish football authorities themselves, an organisation dependent on public funds now taking a stand on one of the most divisive issues in world sport.

Making Ireland’s 2026 EU Presidency A Voice For Its People.

For Ireland’s upcoming EU Presidency to carry real democratic weight, the Government must move beyond token consultation and create genuine channels for citizens to shape the nation’s European agenda.

How the Irish Public Can Engage Meaningfully in Ireland’s EU Presidency Consultation (2026).

From 1st July to 31st December 2026, Ireland will assume the Presidency of the Council of the European Union; a position that will place the Irish Government at the centre of EU policymaking for six crucial months. Ahead of this, the Department of Foreign Affairs has now invited views from domestic stakeholders and the public on the priorities that should shape Ireland’s Presidency programme.

Domestic stakeholders and the public who wish to express viewsPlease See HERE.

On paper, this is an admirable democratic exercise. In practice, however, the distance between the government and the citizen in Ireland has grown markedly, especially in recent years. Many people find it increasingly difficult to have queries answered by TDs or to receive substantive engagement from government Ministers and government Departments. Political dialogue has become one-directional with official statements flowing outward, but public input rarely finds its way back in.

To further prove this point I personally contacted 14 elected Irish TD’s, at the highest level, via email, during the time of this present government and, indeed, the previous government. I received acknowledgements from all 14, but sadly never any replys to the various queries I then highlighted.

If this consultation is to be more than a box-ticking exercise, the Government must create mechanisms that allow citizens to contribute ideas, challenge assumptions, and hold policy-makers accountable for how their feedback is used.

A number of practical steps could make that possible:
Regional Forums: Host open hearings in towns and cities across Ireland — akin to the Citizens’ Assembly format — where ordinary citizens, community organisations, and businesses can voice views on EU priorities such as energy security, migration, the digital economy, and climate policy.
Online Platform: Establish a transparent online portal where individuals can submit policy suggestions, endorse others’ proposals, and see how those inputs are reflected in the final Presidency agenda.
Sectoral Round-tables: Engage directly with universities, trade unions, youth groups, farmers, and SMEs to capture the breadth of Irish experience and expertise.
Public Accountability: Publish a detailed summary showing which ideas were adopted or rejected, and why.

This kind of participatory approach would do more than enhance policy legitimacy. It would also help to restore public faith in democratic dialogue, at a time when trust in institutions and in politics itself is under strain.

An inclusive, transparent consultation process would ensure that Ireland’s EU Presidency is informed not only by officials in Dublin, but by the lived experience of Irish society. That would make the EU Presidency not merely an administrative duty, but a national expression of Ireland’s values and voice in Europe.

Note: The deadline for receipt of submissions is Friday 12th December 2025. If you have any questions, please send your query to the email address hereunder.

The public are invited to please submit their submissions via email to EUPresidency2026Consultations@dfa.ie

Thurles Co. Tipperary Shopping Forecast.

Let’s start with the need and wisdom of shopping around to reduce the cost of living.

Shoppers in Thurles are noticing striking price differences between local supermarket products. A local check in Thurles this week found that an 18-can slab of 7UP Zero was priced at €8.99 in Aldi: – €9.00 in Dunnes Stores: – €11.00 in Tesco: – €11.99 in Lidl: and €14.00 in SuperValu, demonstrating a spread that boldly underscores the point I am about to make and provides proof (as if proof was needed) that it pays to shop around and forget about loyalty.

Locked-In Loyalty – Why Staying with the same Provider is a costly mistake.

Households today are under pressure from multiple fronts, stagnant wages, rising rents, an inflationary drift in everyday goods purchased. In that context, taking time to compare providers for utilities, insurance, broadband or mobile and food is no longer a luxury; it’s a survival tactic. Because when you’re already squeezed, paying above-market rates for services and products you cannot do without, feels less like choice and more like injustice.

The smart consumer doesn’t just accept the default: they should demand value, they should compare, they should switch and not out of triviality, but out of necessity.

Moreover, competition only works if consumers engage: if everyone stays loyal out of inertia, then suppliers have no incentive to drive down costs or improve service. So shopping around is not merely savvy, it’s a civic duty in a market where you’re obliged to pay, but you still deserve fairness.

The Elephants In The Room:
Now let’s address the elephants in the room: the cost of essential services in Ireland, particularly electricity and internet, is woefully high and increasingly indefensible.
The internet provider Vodafone is down in Thurles yet again this morning, leaving people working from home without a service.
Regardless they will still send the same monthly bill at the end of this month and expect people to pay. Over the past 12 month the Vodafone service failed over 34 times; on one occasion last August for a period of 3 consecutive days. It is easier to ride a camel through the eye of a needle, than to complain to the commission for Communications Regulation (ComReg). Why they still continue to exist, few people understand.
When it comes to internet access, Irish consumers got 39% less value for their internet compared to UK users, and is placed only 22nd among European countries.
Put simply: one of your most basic bills is much higher here than most of our European neighbours; this isn’t an incidental detail; it’s a structural cost burden.

Household electricity prices in Ireland were measured at €0.3736 per kWh in the first half of 2024, the highest in the EU for Irish households.
In effect, Irish households are paying €350-plus annually, more for electricity than is the EU average.

What is especially galling is that when something is labelled “essential” it really ought to be priced in a way that doesn’t punish people just for being connected or powered. The fact that despite high VAT, network/levy costs, infrastructure investment and other “legitimate” components, the final bills remain so elevated it suggests a failure somewhere, either in regulation, competition, or both.

In short: shopping-around is vital; but it also shouldn’t be the only defensive mechanism. The system should not rely solely on consumers being alert and mobile. When essential services carry a premium burden, it erodes disposable income, squeezes savings, and perpetuates inequality.

Where to Find the Cheapest Bills in Ireland.

How to shop smart and cut your household costs.
Irish households continue to face some of the highest utility costs in Europe. Here’s how and where to compare providers for cheaper electricity, broadband, insurance, and more.

The Invisible Tax : How Irish Households Fund High Utility Costs
Rising Costs, Shrinking Choices: With electricity, broadband and insurance prices ranked among the highest in Europe, Irish households are paying a heavy premium for essentials. The truth is that loyalty rarely pays, and staying with the same provider year after year can cost you hundreds of euros more than is necessary.
Fortunately, there are independent tools that make comparing and switching simple. Spending just an hour reviewing your main bills once a year can make a real difference to your budget.

Shop Around or Pay the Price: How to Fight Back Against Sky-High Utility Costs.

Electricity & Gas:
Bonkers.ie : – the most comprehensive comparison site for Irish consumers. It lists every licensed energy supplier, breaks down standing charges and tariffs, and estimates your annual savings.
Switcher.ie : – a clear, easy-to-use alternative, often with cashback offers for new customers.
CRU.ie : – the Commission for Regulation of Utilities. It doesn’t compare prices, but it regulates the market and ensures the above sites remain impartial – supposedly.
Tip: Watch out for 12-month “introductory rates”. Once they expire, prices jump sharply, so set a reminder to review before renewal.

Insurance
Chill.ie : – compare car, home and travel insurance in one place.
CompareInsuranceIreland.ie : — independent comparisons that include smaller providers.

Note: Sometimes it pays to check insurers directly; Aviva, Allianz, AXA, or 123.ie can offer better rates to new customers than through a website or program that collects related items of content and displays them or links to them, (known as aggregators).
Tip: Never accept automatic renewals. The biggest insurance savings go to switchers, not loyal customers.

Banking & Mortgages.
CCPC Money Tools : – the official comparison hub from the Competition and Consumer Protection Commission. It covers current accounts, credit cards, personal loans, and mortgage rates.
Tip: If you took out a mortgage more than three years ago, check your rate. Switching lenders can save thousands over the lifetime of your loan.

Final WordFinancial Self-defence and Resistance.
Ireland’s high cost of living is not likely to drop overnight, but smart shopping can make it more manageable. Reviewing your main bills; for energy, broadband, and insurance, once a year is a simple act of financial self-defence.
In a system where essential services cost more than they should, comparison isn’t just wise; it’s a quiet form of resistance.