The Problem with Ireland’s Political Left: Fragmentation, Credibility, and the Lost Connection.
Despite theatrical, showy public anger over housing and other inequality, the Irish left political parties remains more comfortable complaining rather than being convincing, and far from ready to govern in Ireland.
Ireland’s political left has no shortage of dramatic stagey passion, but it still struggles to turn this melodramatic anger into any real power. Despite widespread frustration over housing, healthcare, and inequality, the left remains divided and uncertain of itself. Labour, Sinn Féin, the Social Democrats, and People Before Profit all claim to represent change, yet together they look like a movement more comfortable at public protesting rather than governing a population of 6 million people.
Ireland – The land of rolling green hills, magical castles, and unspoken truth.
Division. Their biggest weakness is division. The left parties spend too much time competing with one another and not enough time convincing the public that they can actually work together. Labour has never recovered from its time in government sleeping with Fine Gael in their desire for power, losing the trust of the lower wage earner, the working man. Sinn Féin, thrives on anger and grievance, but falters when confronted with the practicalities of governance and currently relies heavily on dramatic outrage. Whether it can ever evolve from a party of perpetual opposition into one capable of realistic, credible governance, remains a defining question within Irish politics, while being led by Mrs Mary Louise McDonald. Social Democrats are seen as certainly decent and honest, embodying the politics of competency, well-meaning, and yes serious about reform, yet that very moderation has become their biggest weakness. In a political landscape hungry for power, the party too often projects caution. It offers civility where voters increasingly crave conviction. People Before Profit are loud in opposition, but have little to say about how they would actually run a country. They occupy the far-left edge of Irish politics, a party defined more by its opposition to the system than by any credible vision for governing within it. Rooted in a Marxist tradition that distrusts compromise, it offers uncertainty rather than solutions, a politics of perpetual protest that often mistakes volume for influence. Its activism energises a small but committed base, but successfully isolates the party from the broader electorate.
Credibility Then there’s credibility, or the lack of it. The left is quick to criticise the failures of the system but less convincing when it comes to offering practical, costed solutions. Sinn Féin’s plans often sound ambitious but don’t always add up. Labour still talks about fairness but hasn’t rebuilt trust. The Social Democrats offer steady ideas, but rarely bold ones. Voters may agree with what the left says, but many still doubt it can manage the economy or deliver real results.
Connection with working people. The third problem is a loss of connection with working people. The left once spoke naturally for ordinary workers and families. Now, many of those same people see left-wing parties as out of touch or too focused on cultural debates. In towns and rural areas especially, the left can sound more like it’s talking down, rather than listening.
Narrowness There’s also a narrowness in how the modern Irish left sees the world. Important issues like gender equality, climate action and diversity are central to its message, but sometimes these are delivered in a way that feels moralistic rather than practical. The left’s language has become too shaped by social media and campus politics, and less by the realities of everyday real life.
In the end, the Irish left has mastered complaint, not delivery. It has plenty of passion but little unity; plenty of slogans but no single vision. As long as its parties define themselves mainly by what they oppose, namely Fine Gael, Fianna Fáil, capitalism, or even each other, they will remain on the sidelines while others run the country. The left parties must admit that those ruling have transformed Ireland from one of Europe’s poorest countries into an economic powerhouse, greatly increasing national wealth.
The pattern is clear in today’s politics. Sinn Féin’s rise has stalled, as voters, the silent people, question how an angry Mr Pearse Doherty would actually govern. Labour remains weak and uncertain of its policies. Social Democrats are making progress, but very slowly. People Before Profit continue to protest, but are winning few new supporters as seen in recent test results.
Yes, there is real appetite for change in Ireland, but the left still hasn’t shown that it’s ready to deliver it or even if it can ever provide the goods.
Then yesterday, TippFM Radio lead with the news that Fianna Fáil TD Mr Ryan O’Meara(who hasn’t been in Dáil Éireann a wet week and has achieved nothing since elected), stated that because his party’s chosen candidate Mr Jim Gavin will still be on the ballot paper “he’ll most likely give him No 1, but is undecided on his transfers”. Mr Gavin, as voters will be aware, pulled out of the campaign after it emerged, he knowingly failed, since 2009, to return overpaid rent (some €3,300) to a former tenant.
So here we have two elected TD sitting in our Irish parliament, both threatening to spoil their vote. Have these two powerful gods, who both greatly contribute to political disillusionment, consulted with those who mistakenly voted for them?
Disillusionment with Irish politics is hardly new!
As a presidential election approaches, the temptation to express frustration by spoiling your vote can be strong. Disillusionment with Irish politics is hardly new, and for many voters the choices on offer may indeed feel limited or uninspiring. Yet, while spoiling a vote might seem like an act of protest, it ultimately carries no political weight, and serves only to silence the voter’s own voice.
A spoiled vote is recorded, but not counted. It doesn’t shape the outcome, nor does it send a clear signal of discontent. Political parties and candidates rarely draw meaning from spoiled ballots; they focus instead on the valid votes that determine who wins and who loses. If the aim is to make politicians listen, then a spoiled vote does not achieve it.
Those who advocate spoiling a ballot, serve only their wish to silence you the voter.
Democracy depends on participation. When citizens disengage, the balance of power shifts towards those who do turn out, often the more organised or entrenched interests. Casting a valid vote, even reluctantly, strengthens the democratic process and keeps it fully accountable. With Ireland’s system of proportional representation, every first preference vote can make a difference, particularly in tight local or constituency contests where margins are often slim.
Is to spoil a vote a symbolic statement against a broken political system????
Some “chowderhead’s” argue that spoiling a vote is a symbolic statement against a broken political system. But a spoiled ballot says only what a voter rejects, not what they want. A better form of protest is to vote for candidates that reflect our values more closely. Even a low tally of first-preference votes can shape political debate in future elections.
Let it never be forgotten that the right to vote in Ireland was hard-won. Generations before us fought to secure it, often at great personal risk and death. Choosing not to vote, or to use use your vote in a way that has no effect, diminishes the legacy they granted to the present generation and to future generations.
Ultimately, voting is both a right but also a responsibility. It is an expression of hope that things can change, however slowly. Spoiling a vote may provide psychological relief through the open expression of strong emotions in the moment, but it leaves the field to others to now decide your future.
Remember in a democracy, silence is never the strongest statement.
EU Council Meeting discusses the return of third-country nationals, internal security of the Union, and better supports for Member States responding to emergencies.
Progress made towards agreeing a common European returns system to ensure the swift return of third-country nationals staying unlawfully in the EU.
Focus on strengthening cooperation between Member States to investigate and prosecute serious and organised cross-border crime.
Examination of ways in which the European Union can better coordinate support for Member States responding to natural and human induced emergencies.
Discussion on how to ensure free and open debate while at the same time protecting those involved in politics from threats and violence.
Minister for Justice, Home Affairs and Migration, Mr Jim O’Callaghan, met with his European counterparts in Brussels this week to discuss co-operation on migration, internal security and cross-border justice.
During two days of meetings, Ministers for Home Affairs and Migration considered proposals for a common European return system for migrants, latter who have no legal permission to remain in the EU.
Minister O’Callaghan reaffirmed Ireland’s commitment to the initiative, saying: “Ireland is committed to the establishment of a common EU return system that is effective, fair and functional. We will continue to engage with our partners to finalise a robust mechanism to achieve this.”
Ministers also discussed the impact of the conflict in Gaza on EU internal security, with concerns raised about societal divisions and extremism. “While Ireland is not currently experiencing the same levels of polarisation as some other Member States, we share concerns about the rise of racism, antisemitism and Islamophobia,” Minister O’Callaghan said. “Ireland remains committed to promoting equality, inclusiveness and respect for human rights.”
Discussions extended to how the EU can better prepare for and respond to emergencies, including climate-related events. Minister O’Callaghan highlighted Ireland’s experience of EU support following Storm Éowyn, noting that greater cooperation will be vital in the face of growing global challenges.
At the meeting of Justice Ministers, strengthening Eurojust, the EU agency supporting Member States in tackling serious cross-border crime, was a key topic.
“Irish prosecutors and Gardaí have successfully handled many cross-border cases with Eurojust’s support,” the Minister said. “Ireland welcomes efforts to ensure the agency has the resources it needs to continue this vital work.”
Ministers also discussed protecting open political debate while ensuring the safety of public representatives. “Those in public life should not be subjected to personal abuse or intimidation,” Minister O’Callaghan said. “Protecting democracy means protecting the people who serve it.”
Other issues on the agenda included law enforcement access to data, protection of fundamental rights, and simplification of the EU’s regulatory framework.
At the current level of progress, Ireland will fail to meet the EU and national goal of restoring all waters to good or better status by 2027.
Excess nutrients from agriculture, urban wastewater and other human activities remains the biggest challenge, followed by changes to physical habitat conditions.
Just over half (52%) of our surface waters are in satisfactory ecological condition, which is a deterioration from the previous assessment for 2016-2021, where 54% of surface waterbodies met their water quality objectives.
There is evidence that nutrient levels are reducing in areas where actions are being targeted, which is very welcome. The scale and pace of implementation need to be increased.
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has today published their flagship Water Quality in Ireland Report 2019-2024, which provides the latest, 3-yearly assessment of the quality of Ireland’s rivers, lakes, estuaries, coastal waters, canals and groundwaters. This assessment includes multiple water quality parameters that are monitored and assessed to give an integrated picture of the condition of our waters. The report shows that, despite improvements in some areas, water quality in Ireland is not as good as it should be and is continuing to decline overall:
River Suir, Thurles, Co. Tipperary Pic: G. Willoughby.
52% of rivers, lakes, estuaries and coastal waters are in a satisfactory ecological condition, which means in good or high ecological status. This is a decline since the 2016-2021 assessment when 54% of surface waters were satisfactory.
Transitional waters, including estuaries and coastal lagoons, are in the poorest condition of any waterbody type, with 70% in an unsatisfactory condition, up from 64% in the last assessment.
92% of groundwaters are in good status. Canals are also in relatively good condition with 87% achieving their water quality targets.
Sewage Pipe flows into River Suir in Thurles Town Centre. Pic: G. Willoughby.
Commenting on the report, Dr Eimear Cotter, Director of the EPA’s Office of Evidence and Assessment, said: “Our rivers, lakes and estuaries are the lifeblood of our landscape and support our ecosystems, and our health and wellbeing. But they are struggling. They do not have the resilience to cope with the challenges they face, now and in the future. Surface water quality overall has been in decline since before the first of these assessments was carried out by the EPA in the late 2000s. It is very disappointing to report that water quality is not improving despite the many actions that are underway, across all sectors. It’s clear the scale and pace of implementation needs to be increased and sustained.” The main pressures impacting on water quality are excess nutrients coming mainly from agriculture, urban wastewater discharges, and damage to the physical condition of water habitats from activities such as land and river drainage, forestry and urban development. The report highlights that there have been improvements in phosphorus levels in our surface waters in areas prioritised for action where the right measures are implemented in the right places to target interventions. There were also reductions in nitrogen levels in many river monitoring sites in recent years, which is welcome. Further reductions will be needed to reach levels that will support healthy ecosystems.
Dr Jenny Deakin, EPA Programme Manager added: “The decreases in phosphorus levels in areas prioritised for action are very welcome. While further reductions will be needed as well as reduction in nitrate levels, this report shines a light on the progress that can be made when actions are targeted. It is essential that better information is collected by all stakeholders, on when and where the actions are being implemented on the ground, to provide better information on how the progress can be accelerated.” Information about local water quality and the pressures impacting it is available at www.catchments.ie
Oireachtas members from Clare and Limerick have given their backing to a three-tier plan to expand hospital capacity in the Mid-West, following publication of HIQA’s review of urgent and emergency care services in the region.
At a meeting in Limerick today, eight members of the Oireachtas agreed that all three options proposed by HIQA should be advanced in parallel, in order to relieve ongoing pressure at University Hospital Limerick (UHL).
Oireachtas members from Clare and Limerick listen to a presentation by Dr Terry Hennessy, at a meeting held at the Great National South Court Hotel today.
Under the preferred approach, immediate investment would focus on expanding bed capacity on the existing UHL site at Dooradoyle. Medium-term development would see the establishment of a second UHL campus nearby comprising of out-patients department, diagnostics and adult mental health, with a longer-term goal of moving the maternity hospital and other acute services including a new Emergenct Department (ED) to the nearby site under shared governance. This would provide a high quality multi-generational and emergency care service for the Mid-West Region.
It was agreed that Option A combined with Option B will ultimately deliver Option C.
The meeting, held at the Great National South Court Hotel and convened by Clare TD Joe Cooney(Fine Gael), was attended by Minister Patrick O’Donovan(Fine Gael), Minister of State Timmy Dooley(Fianna Fáil), TDs Cathal Crowe and Willie O’Dea(Fianna Fáil), Senators Maria Byrne, Martin Conway and Dee Ryan, and Clare County Council Cathaoirleach Paul Murphy.
Oireachtas members from Clare and Limerick listen to a presentation by Dr Terry Hennessy, at a meeting held at the Great National South Court Hotel today.
Dr Terry Hennessy, the HSE’s Regional Clinical Lead for Strategy and Development, briefed members on the significant constraints to expansion of the UHL site at Dooradoyle, the lack of capacity for that site on its own to deliver for the long-term future needs of the area, along with the HSE Mid-West short, medium and long-term plans for implementing the HIQA recommendations.
Following a positive and very constructive meeting, members agreed to support the HSE Mid-West’s commitment to pursuing all three strands and to engage with the Department of Health to secure full Government backing. A follow-up meeting is planned for early November 2025 in Leinster House, with Health Minister Jennifer Carroll MacNeill and senior department officials to be invited.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish.AcceptRead More
Privacy & Cookies Policy
Privacy Overview
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
Recent Comments