Archives

Two-Speed Tourism: National Dip Masks Resilient Domestic Season In Tipperary.

Two-speed tourism: national dip masks resilient domestic season in Tipperary, but are local results overstated?

Ireland’s tourism industry is finishing 2025 in two very different gears.

Nationally, the Irish Tourism Industry Confederation (ITIC) estimates overseas visitor numbers of 6.16 million, down 6% on 2024, with international visitor spend down 13% to about €5.27bn (excluding fares).
ITIC’s year-end review says North America stayed strong, with US visitor numbers up 4% and Canada up 8%, but performance weakened elsewhere, including Britain (-4%), France (-13%) and Germany (-8%).
See Irish Tourism Review.

The Swiss Cottage, Cahir, Tourist Attraction.

The confederation points to persistent “value for money” pressures, citing Eurostat data that ranks Ireland among the highest-cost countries in the EU.
See ‘Comparative price levels of consumer goods and services’.

It also warns the sector is becoming increasingly exposed by its growing reliance on the North American market.

Yet in the regions, the picture can look more resilient, and Tipperary is certainly a case in point.

A Tipperary County Council “State of the Season” survey, covering months January to September 2025 compared with the same period in 2024, found 74% of participating businesses reported growth or stable performance, with 26% recording a decline.

Accommodation providers were mixed but largely steady, with 66% reporting increased or stable performance, while domestic tourism remained the strongest driver: 72% matched or exceeded domestic occupancy levels from 2024.
Attractions and activity providers reported even stronger results, with 82% up or stable on visitor numbers, underpinned by very strong Irish engagement, with 94% reporting domestic growth or stability.

The same report notes a clear behavioural shift: shorter stays and later booking patterns are now entrenched, putting greater emphasis on flexibility, sharp pricing and value-led packages.

So, the question remains, are the Tipperary reports being exaggerated?

It’s a reasonable question, but the most accurate way to frame it is that the Tipperary findings are a pulse survey, not a full census.
The report is based on feedback from 67 tourism businesses, meaning outcomes can be influenced by who participated, the mix of respondents (accommodation versus attractions, large versus small operators), and what “growth” means, (revenue, occupancy, footfall or simply sentiment).
It’s also notable that ITIC itself flags a broader measurement tension at national level, saying there can be a gap between CSO survey readings and “industry intelligence”, with some business indicators suggesting a flatter year than headline declines imply.

In other words, both things can be true at once: national inbound and spend can be down, while a county with strong domestic engagement, particularly in attractions and activities, can still report a broadly positive season among surveyed operators.

Personally, as a former worker within the industry and a full time resident within Tipperary, I would be slightly worried by the accuracy of some figures provided in relation to the ‘Tipperary Report’ findings.

Tipperary Co. Co. Invite Public Consultation On Harmonised Parking Bye-Laws.

Tipperary County Council to invite public consultation on Harmonised Parking Bye-Laws 2026.

Tipperary County Council will commence a public consultation on January 12th 2026 regarding the proposed “Harmonised Parking Bye-Laws 2026”.
These bye-laws aim to deliver a fair, consistent and modern county-wide parking system, moving away from the nine separate systems, which currently exist in each of our towns where there is a charge for parking.

The key proposed changes are as follows:

  • Three-tier charging structure for the nine towns reflecting the diverse character of each town.
  • Tier 1: Clonmel.
  • Tier 2: Thurles, Nenagh.
  • Tier 3: Roscrea, Templemore, Tipperary Town, Cashel, Cahir, Carrick-on-Suir.

Formal 20-minute free parking period in short and medium-stay parking zones; (perfect for that person in flat shoes, who can complete a full town-centre errand, involving running at Olympic pace; to post a letter; collect a prescription; grab a loaf; que at a Supermarket check-out; then find the one shop you actually needed is closed, and be back at the car before the engine properly cools).
Standard parking location maps for all pay parking areas across all Tipperary towns.
Parking zones at different rates will still be decided by the Elected Members at District level, if they can avoid their full time teaching posts and other occupations, in order to attend.

The new county-wide bye-laws seek to:

  1. Support our town centres by encouraging parking turnover and the associated footfall.
  2. Provide equity county-wide with equal charges for similar parking services for the towns in each of the 3 tiers.
  3. Introduce a formal 20-minute free parking period in short and medium-stay town centre zones.
  4. Ensure that off-street car parking will be cheaper than on-street parking.
  5. Provide clarity and consistency with standardised permit categories and charging times county-wide.
  6. Provide clear and consistent mapping of the parking system across all nine towns for public display.

The proposed bye-laws will replace multiple existing regulations and bye-laws and, subject to adoption, are expected to come into effect on September 1st 2026.

In parallel to the new bye-laws a scheme is proposed to return a percentage of parking income to each of the nine towns where that income is generated: same to support and fund town centre projects, initiatives and developments, e.g. Straighten sign posts and replace bollards removed by high sided vehicles the week before, or correct errors previously designed by money wasting town engineers. On wonders where such funds generated were allocated previously.
However, focusing on Thurles; many will note a small mathematical complication: you can’t generate much parking income in a town centre where car parks remain unavailable and areas, like our town centre, where there are little to no spaces left to generate it from. It’s a bit like running a swimming pool fundraiser, after the water has been removed.

And while Thurles town centre may be short on parking, retail consumers point out it doesn’t seem short on enforcement, with two traffic wardens still in place, giving the impression that Thurles has perfected a rare civic innovation: a town centre where parking is scarce, but getting a ticket remains reliably available.

Tipperary County Council will have these draft Bye Laws available for inspection from January 12th 2026, for a period of one month, and will be inviting comments and submissions on these bye-law proposals for a further two weeks.

Members of the public are encouraged to participate, safe in the knowledge that their views, as is usual, will be carefully received, respectfully acknowledged, and then placed in the traditional local authority filing system marked as “Please Ignore”.

A Tipperary Contradiction That Needs Answers – What Happened Factual Backbone?

Funding the fallout, voting down the fix; a Tipperary contradiction that now needs immediate answers from elected representatives.

Tipperary is far from short when it comes to finding people with big hearts. You see it in the dog rescues and sanctuaries that keep going on often bare fumes, using volunteers who juggling jobs, families and fundraising, while trying to pick up the pieces for neglected animals nobody else will take responsibility.

So it lands badly, to put it mildly, when our county’s TDs can applaud welfare funding with one hand and, with the other, vote down a measure many people see as a basic line in the sand, when it comes to animal cruelty.

See Link Here: An act to amend the Animal Health and Welfare Act 2013 to ban the hunting of a fox or
foxes; and to provide for related matters
.

On Wednesday, December 17th 2025, Dáil Éireann rejected the Animal Health and Welfare (Ban on Fox Hunting) Bill 2025 at Second Stage, by 124 votes to 24.

Irish for a Fox – ‘Madra Rua‘ (translates into english literally as “Red Dog”).
‘Sionnach‘ also Irish word for “Fox”. Its etymology is sometimes linked to the word “shenanigans,” meaning “I play the fox”.

Was this an attempt by TDs at catching the farming vote?
The Bill aimed to outlaw the use of dogs to hunt or flush out foxes, and to prohibit trapping or snaring foxes in order to eradicate them.

In County Tipperary, the Dáil voting record was as clear as it was discomforting.

According to Tipperary local Press & Radio, Mr Séamus Healy was the only Tipperary TD to vote in favour of the Bill. Mr Mattie McGrath, Mr Michael Lowry, Mr Ryan O’Meara, and Mr Michael Murphy voted against the Bill. Mr Alan Kelly as usual sat on the fence, abstaining.

That’s not a “difference of emphasis”. That’s Tipperary’s Dáil delegation, overwhelmingly, either opposing the ban outright or declining to back it. And here’s where the contradiction bites: only days earlier, government announced what it described as the highest-ever allocation under the Animal Welfare Grants Programme, €6,434,803 to 94 charities nationwide.
Tipperary’s share, some of our elected representatives reported, was less than €134,000 across six groups this year; down from “just shy of €200,000” for same six groups granted funding last year.

The six Tipperary allocations named were:

  • Mo Chara Animal Rescue (Thurles): €38,000.
  • Roscrea SPCA: €37,650
  • Haven Rescue (Roscrea): €25,000
  • Great Hounds in Need (Kilcash): €12,000
  • Cappanagarrane Horse Rescue (Mullinahone): €11,175
  • PAWS (Mullinahone): €10,000, (down from over €76,000 last year according to local radio).

Let me be crystal clear: those groups deserve every cent and more. They are doing essential public-good work, rescuing, rehabilitating, rehoming, some educating.
But that is exactly why voters are entitled to ask a tougher question than the usual “aren’t the grants grand?” photo-op.

Why is “animal welfare” easy when it’s tidy, but difficult when it’s political?

Grants are safe. Everyone likes a grant. A minister gets to say “record funding”; a TD gets a local headline; the public gets to feel the county is decent and compassionate. And yes, to be fair, it is.

But fox hunting legislation forces a proper choice. Not a vague sentiment. A vote.

Supporters of the ban argue it’s simple: using packs of dogs to chase and tear apart a wild animal for sport, belongs in the past. Opponents dress it up as “rural reality” and “pest control”. Yet reporting on the Bill is clear on one crucial point: it would not have outlawed the shooting of foxes on one’s land for the purpose of protecting livestock.
This was not, in black-and-white terms, a proposal to leave farmers helpless. It was a proposal to stop a specific practice: using dogs to hunt, flush out foxes, before tearing them into pieces, and other certain killing methods by trapping/snaring.
So when four Tipperary TDs voted against it and one abstained, people are entitled to ask: what, exactly, are you defending and why?

“No” is not a policy. If the argument is that the Bill was flawed, then where is the alternative from our representatives?

  • Where is the concrete plan for stronger animal welfare rules that reduce suffering in practice, not just in speeches?
  • Where is the push for enforceable oversight, transparent standards, independent monitoring, real penalties?
  • Where is the willingness to say, publicly, that certain traditions don’t get a free pass any more because they are vote catching, loud, organised, or longstanding?

Because while Leinster House argues, it’s local communities that carry the consequences of a lax welfare culture, and the rescues that pick up the pieces. The same county that depends on Mo Chara, Roscrea SPCA, Haven, Great Hounds in Need, Cappanagarrane, and PAWS to cope with the everyday reality of neglect, abandonment and injury is being asked to accept political leadership that stops short the minute the issue becomes controversial.

A simple ask for 2026: explain yourselves.

Tipperary doesn’t need performative compassion. It needs consistency.
If you’re Mattie McGrath, Michael Lowry, Ryan O’Meara or Michael Murphy, tell people plainly why you voted against the ban, given it did not prevent farmers from shooting foxes to protect livestock.
If you’re Alan Kelly, tell people why you abstained when the county’s position was being written into the record.
And if you’re Séamus Healy, tell people what you think should happen next, now that the Bill has been defeated.

Here’s the call to action: contact your TD, not with slogans, but with two questions:

  1. If you oppose this ban, what specific alternative will you support to strengthen animal welfare in this area?
  2. Will you commit to voting for stronger protections the next time the issue comes before the Dáil?

Because funding the rescues is the right thing to do. But it is not enough to keep funding the fallout while voting down efforts, however imperfect, to reduce cruelty at source.

A Letter To Government From The People Of Tipperary

Dear Esteemed Voices of Opposition in Government. (Yes, you lot).

We, the People of Tipperary (yes, that rag-tag, unwashed mob, who struggle to pay the rent, mind the children, endure freezing radiators and fruitless housing-hunts), write to you today with admiration.

Oh yes, you have mastered something truly impressive: the art of being perpetually angry and outraged, heroically indignant and spectacularly unhelpful. (Bravo, Three Cheers, Hip, Hip, Hooray).

You stand there in the Dáil, gesturing grandly, as though you are the last defenders of Irish morality and justice, and the nation watches on, in overwhelming fear and general anxiety, before wondering what the hell exactly were you offering yet again?

Our Civic Palace of Stone & Voice.

Awe-inspiring words (volume high, content light).
Your speeches soar with righteous anger. You denounce, you condemn, you rail against government failures. You paint bleak pictures of homelessness, cost-of-living, neglect, inequality. You raise the volume, you draw the cameras, you craft the headlines and welcome criminals into our Ardeaglais na nDlíthe (Cathedral / High Church of Laws), our Civic Palace of Stone and Voice, our People’s Drawing-Room, better known as Leinster House.

Yet, when the press lights dim and the papers close, the problems remain. Those health waiting lists grow – the rents continue to climb – the vacant units and houses stay vacant and deteriorate – and the young people we highly educate for free simply emigrate to the benefit of other states.

Is this your grand plan? A master-class in rhetorical fury, without a blueprint, without a map, without wheels that actually roll.

No plan, no policy, just performance
You accuse the Government of failure, and indeed with some justice. But then: what is your remedy?
You hand us soundbites, slogans, finger-pointing. You hand us anger and outrage. You do not hand us homes. You do not hand many people peace of mind.
If politics is a fire, you seem to delight in fanning flames of indignation, but offer no water, no ladder, no shovel to dig foundations to rebuild what has burned.

Procedure over purpose.
You treat parliamentary procedure like a stage for drama. Adjournments, speaking-rights rows, stand-off’s, delicious theatre. Critics dare to call it “chaos.” Some might even call it an embarrassment. But to you, it’s perfect. Because nothing says “principled opposition” like disruption for disruption’s sake.
You trumpet this as integrity. We hear the loud banging and the unconstructive silence that follows those bangs.

Then amongst the so called Independents; those great parliamentary wallflowers who would sooner walk barefoot across hot coals than appear in a live television debate. They know full well that the moment they open their mouths without a script, the entire country would witness the intellectual equivalent of a slow-motion car crash. So instead, they clutch their pre-written sheets, like a toddler clings to a comfort blanket, lift them up with trembling hands; while attempting to read aloud words they clearly had only encountered for the first time, just moments earlier.

What follows is a linguistic bloodbath: mispronounced names, mangled terminology, long pauses where they glare at the page as if the letters are rearranging themselves out of spite. They stutter, they stumble, they sweat, like someone trying to defuse a bomb using only phonics. It becomes obvious that the speech wasn’t written for them, so much as in spite of them. By the time they reach the end, the chamber is left wondering not what point they were trying to make, but how such a person was ever trusted with a microphone, a mandate, or indeed the ability to read aloud in public.
These today are, allegedly, our lawmakers. God help us.

And then, of course, we have the Opposition’s “Elder States People” Sinn Féin, those political veterans who behave as though their entire past was spent rescuing kittens from trees and mentoring youth choirs, rather than, whatever it was they were actually doing. Their official biographies glide gracefully from birth to present day, skipping over entire decades the way a dodgy landlord skips over mentioning mould in a rental advert.

These are the same people who now lecture the public about peace, ethics and moral leadership, while hoping no one ever dusts off the old photo albums from their glory days, which saw them remembered for blowing things up with great enthusiasm and who involved themselves in robbing banks and home grown genocide.

Listening to them now; polished, pious, freshly laundered, you’d swear they spent the 1980s running charity bake sales rather than attending strategy meetings in windowless rooms, lit by a single flickering candle. Their reinventions are so dramatic they make witness protection programmes look lazy.

And yet, with straight faces and quivering angry indignation, they condemn everyone else for moral failings. It would be funny if it weren’t so magnificently ridiculous, a whole troupe of reformed revolutionaries pretending their pasts were nothing more than a misunderstanding, involving fireworks and enthusiastic landscaping.

The people, now weary, watch from the sidelines.
We are tired; not of the problems, no we cannot afford that luxury. We are tired of the show. We are tired of the endless promises of change, if only the Government is shamed enough. Shame. Shame again, and then, nothing.

We, the salary payers, used to believe that opposition was a safeguard: a watchdog, a conscience, a balance. Now, increasingly, we suspect it’s become a puppet-show, put on for the people, yes, your employers, who are now a jaded audience.

What we the people would like you to remember:

  • If you believe there is a crisis, propose a fix, not just an angry rant.
  • If you object to the way things are run, say how you would run them, not just why they are wrong.
  • If you seek to hold power accountable, do so without turning every debate into a circus. Clarity beats chaos.
  • And finally; remember those of us who don’t work a 3 day week outside of Leinster House. The ones who count the days until payday, who worry where the next rent cheque will come from, who wonder if home will ever mean more than a roof and attempt to give us hope.

Without hope, loud speeches become hollow noise, and parliament becomes a theatre of shadows.

Yours sincerely,
We, the People of Tipperary,
(tired of the Drama, longing for Delivery).

Thurles Businesses & Parish Alarmed At Munster Hotel Car Park Closure.

Thurles businesses and parish alarmed, as Munster Hotel car park in Thurles, faces closure, yet again, with effect from 1st December, 2025.

The decision to close the car park, situated beside the former Munster Hotel, yet again, on December 1st next, 2025, has sparked deep concern and outrage among local business owners, churchgoers, and the wider Thurles community.
What was once a lifeline for retailers, consumers, parishioners and school-bus users, east of the town is now threatened, just as the town prepares for its busiest season of the year.

Former Munster Hotel car park threatened with closure on December 1st next, 2025.

A Blow To Faith, Commerce and Community.
The car park’s closure will leave attendees at Thurles Cathedral, for Masses, funerals, and other important rites, struggling to find parking, creating potential hazards and serious access issues.
Small local businesses, already feeling the strain from limited footfall, now fear a catastrophic drop in trade at the worst possible time: the run-up to Christmas.
With the Thurles Market Quarter car park still closed for over a year and ‘The Source’ building car park closed for nearly three years, the looming loss of this space could be a tipping point.

Public car parking spots on Kickham Street reallocated to school bus services.

Shockingly, in what many see as “salt in the wound”, a number of previously public parking spots on Kickham Street, have recently been reallocated, without prior notice, to school bus services.

Ownership, Influence And Frustration:
The Munster Hotel and its adjoining car park are understood to be owned by Mr. Martin Healy, a high-profile local businessperson and a former member of the Thurles Chamber of Commerce, latter the very organisation that is tasked in promoting entrepreneurship and supporting small enterprises in the town.
The irony is not lost therefore on local small business owners: the private owner closing a facility that is absolutely vital to the community.

The car park is currently rented by Tipperary County Council, but unconfirmed reports suggest that lease negotiations have broken down, fuelling accusations of neglect and mismanagement.

A Town On The Brink:
Many in Thurles are now asking: how much more can local businesses absorb? How many more loyal customers will be lost because they simply cannot find a spot to park? And what message does this send when, at a time when the town should be rallying together, its own infrastructure fails exactly those who need it most?
The impending closure will also likely expose pedestrians and road-users to increasing risk. With school buses now allocated to street parking, and the Cathedral’s forecourt full, the potential for dangerous traffic congestion is all too real.

Businesses Call For Immediate Action:
Tipperary County Council must urgently intervene. This car park is not just a private asset; it is a public necessity.
Thurles Chamber of Commerce must reflect on its role: supporting small businesses means protecting their lifelines, not shutting them off.
Local elected representatives and stakeholders must demand a rapid, transparent solution that ensures parking is available for parishioners, shoppers, and visitors, especially during this Christmas season.

Conclusion:
This is more than a car park dispute. This is a story of a town’s heartbeat being squeezed: of faith, community, and commerce, all now under threat. With the Munster Hotel itself long derelict, the parking facility has become more than a convenience, it is a cornerstone of Thurles daily life.

Its closure cannot be allowed to be yet another casualty of short-term thinking.