Archives

Back To School Clothing & Footwear Allowance.

Low-income families are increasingly anxious that the next electricity bill will be the one they simply can’t meet, as everyday usage becomes a choice between heat, light and other essentials.

Official figures show that 7.4% of people went without heating at some stage in the past year, due to lack of money, while 4.5% said they were unable to keep their home adequately warm, a stark measure of energy deprivation even before the worst winter pressures bite.

At the same time, the energy regulator’s arrears updates show a significant share of domestic electricity accounts currently remain in arrears, with large numbers in longer-term debt (90+ days), underlining how quickly “a tough month” can become a lasting burden.

Anti-poverty groups, including SVP, warn that once-off supports have faded while costs remain punishing, leaving families fearful of disconnection, mounting repayment plans, and cold homes becoming normal.

However, there is a small glimmer of light at the end of this winter tunnel for people in receipt of Child Support Payments or getting a qualifying social protection payment or taking part in an approved employment, education or training support scheme, so do hang-in there.

Keep in mind that applications will open on June 1st for Back to School Clothing and Footwear Allowance eligibility for 2026.
Families who qualify for the Back to School Clothing and Footwear Allowance (BSCFA) can apply from June 1st to 30th September each year, with the Department of Social Protection confirming the scheme window and advising that the 2026 scheme will open in June 2026.

The once-off, means-tested payment is designed to help with the cost of children’s clothing and footwear ahead of the return to school each autumn.

Payment rates.
The allowance is paid per eligible child, at two rates:
€160 for children aged 4–11.
€285 for children aged 12–22 (where eligible).
Children aged 18–22 must be returning to second-level education to qualify.

Key change for 2026: extension to children aged 2 and 3.
As part of Budget 2026, the Department has confirmed that the €160 rate will be extended to children aged 2 and 3 who qualify, a change that will apply for the 2026 Back to School Clothing and Footwear Allowance BSCFA.

Who qualifies.
To be eligible, applicants must meet a number of conditions, including:

  • Be getting a qualifying social protection payment or taking part in an approved employment, education or training support scheme.
  • Be getting Child Support Payment (previously Increase for a Qualified Child) for each child claimed (with some exceptions).
  • Satisfy the household income limit (means test) and be resident in the State, as must each child claimed.

Operational guidelines set out weekly income limits (for 2025, for example: €694 for one child, €756 for two, €818 for three and €880 for four, with an additional €62 for each extra child).

How to apply and who gets paid automatically.
The Department says many families will be paid automatically through a data-matching process, with award notices issued to a person’s MyWelfare account or by post in June.
However, if you have not received an award notice by the end of June, and you meet the conditions, you will need to apply, even if you were paid automatically in previous years.

Applications are made online via MyWelfare.ie, which requires a verified MyGovID account.

Closing date.
The deadline to apply is September 30th of the scheme year.

Ford Issues Fire-Risk Warning To 2,865 Irish Kuga plug-In Hybrid Owners

Ford has issued an urgent safety warning to 2,865 Irish owners of its Kuga plug-in hybrid (PHEV), advising that a high-voltage battery defect could, in certain circumstances, lead to battery thermal venting and potentially a vehicle fire, with a risk of injury.

Kuga Plug-In Hybrid

The renewed warning follows an earlier safety notice issued in March 2025 affecting the same vehicles, when owners were instructed not to charge the battery due to the risk of a short circuit while driving. Ford later stated that a software update, rolled out in July 2025, would detect anomalies and prevent any fire risk.

However, owners who previously received, and in many cases installed, that update have now been sent a fresh warning letter instructing them to follow the latest guidance regardless of whether the earlier action was completed.

What owners are being told to do now
Until a permanent remedy is available, Ford is advising affected customers to:

  • Limit charging to a maximum of 80% and do not exceed this limit.
  • Use only the default “Auto EV” mode, and avoid Deep Mud and Snow modes until further notice.

Ford has said it does not yet have a fix, but anticipates a remedy by mid-year, and that customers will be contacted and instructed to arrange a dealer visit once the remedy is ready.

Vehicles affected.
Ford said the vehicles impacted were manufactured before 28th November 2023, and that unsold affected vehicles have been placed on hold.

Background and customer impact.
The Kuga crossover has been one of Ford’s strongest sellers in Ireland, with 3,124 registrations over the past three years, and more than 95% of those sales being plug-in hybrids.
Last year, some owners affected by the initial defect began legal actions against the car maker, with one Circuit Court claim alleging the vehicle was effectively worthless while repayments continued under a personal contract plan.
Asked why battery packs are not being replaced and whether compensation would be considered for owners facing difficulties selling affected vehicles, Ford said it would “define the right remedy for this issue”, adding: “We apologise for any inconvenience this may cause to our customers… We remain committed to providing our customers with safe and high-quality vehicles, addressing potential issues and responding quickly.”

Customer guidance:
Affected owners are advised to follow the instructions in Ford’s letter and contact Ford’s customer contact centre or their dealer for further assistance.

Councillors Warn Accommodation Shortage Is Limiting Tipperary’s Tourism Potential.

Thurles Tourism Debate : Part I.

Maybe I am missing something.

But where were the invitations issued to the people whose pay packets actually depend on Thurles and Tipperary tourism? How many hoteliers, B&B owners, tour operators, café and retail staff, guides and event organisers; those living the reality of the season, were to be found at this month’s council meeting to spell out, at firsthand, what is choking the industry and what must now change?

Isn’t there a deeper irony here? Are these not the very councillors and officials who, year after year, have presided over the slow neglect and destruction of our visitor attractions, allowing standards to slip, opportunities to be missed, and avoidable damage to mount, only to now lament the consequences as if they were bystanders rather than decision-makers?

I refer of course to the Tipperary County Council members who warned that a shortage of visitor accommodation is now the single biggest barrier to growing tourism in Tipperary, limiting the ability to host events, retain tour groups and convert day-trippers into overnight stays.

Tourism.

At the Tipperary County Council’s January meeting, elected members heard an update on tourism performance and marketing activity, but stressed that the county is effectively trying to grow the visitor economy with insufficient “bed nights” to support conferences, festivals and group travel.

Councillors also raised concerns that coach tours are increasingly stopping briefly at flagship attractions before moving on, while organisers of large gatherings are forced to seek accommodation outside the county due to limited capacity and difficulty securing blocks of rooms.

Councillors also stated that 5,000 visitors attended the two-day music festival in Thurles, [ Same hosting 17 Tribute Bands on July 4th & 5th, 2026] and yet they also claim events like this receive only paltry funding from Tipperary County Council, [press quote “not worth a damn to festivals …”.]

But is that claim borne out by the numbers?
With this year’s event already sold out, and with day tickets priced at €30 and weekend tickets at €45, even a basic calculation raises obvious questions. If the headline attendance figure of 5,000 daily in attendance is accurate, then 5,000 weekend tickets at €45.00, would suggest revenue in excess of €225,000 before any single day-ticket sales are even considered.

So why, then, is the Council’s support being described as paltry? On what basis is that judgement being made and against what set of accounts?

The difficulty is that, as far as we are aware, the Council has not publicly published last year’s accounts in relation to the Thurles Musical Festival. Without transparent figures, it is impossible for the public to assess what level of funding was provided, what costs were involved, or whether the paltry label is fair, exaggerated, or simply politically convenient. After all this so called paltry sum is taxpayers money; not the gift of a benevolent and nameless altruistic patroness or good fairy.

Indeed until those accounts are published, the questions will remain: how much public money was actually provided, where did it go, and how does it stack up against the event’s apparent income?

The core warning they claim is simple – promotion is outpacing capacity.
Members were clear that marketing alone cannot deliver tourism growth if Tipperary cannot provide sufficient accommodation to keep visitors in the county overnight. The meeting heard that reduced availability in some areas and the broader national pressures on accommodation is impacting Tipperary’s ability to capitalise on tourism demand.

While officials noted this is a national challenge, councillors argued that the consequence for Tipperary is specific and immediate: events, tour groups and visitor spending are being lost because the county cannot consistently offer the volume of bed nights required to compete.

But the people whose pay packets depend on Thurles and Tipperary tourism ask the question “Where is all this promotion”?
Local councillors flagged caravan/campervan parking as a growing issue, particularly “unmanaged” parking in scenic spots (including lakeside areas), and warned it’s causing local frustration and putting pressure on amenities.

What was said, in plain terms:
Unmanaged campervan/caravan parking is becoming “a serious problem” in some areas, with councillors reporting that it is increasingly to be found along lakes and other high-amenity locations.
Councillors said they’re getting complaints from residents about inappropriate parking and pressure on local facilities, and that the situation needs planned, serviced, designated locations rather than ad hoc stopping.

Council officials responded that a dedicated campervan and caravanning strategy is being developed, backed byexternal funding, to ensure facilities are properly located/designed and to curb unmanaged activity.

We will be speaking more about these failures in the coming days, so do stay tuned. See Part II HERE.

New Thurles Car Park Entrance Widened To Ease Access & Improve Safety.

It started, as these things always do, with a local lad who had no reason to tell fibs, and every reason to be believed, because he said it with absolute conviction while pointing at the pile of rubble like he’d personally witnessed the fall of the ancient walls of Jericho.

“It was a pigeon,” he announced, solemn as a coroner. “Not your regular one either. Low-flying it was, doing eighty, like a feathery meteor.”

With the New Thurles Car Park entrance now widened, locals will also have noticed that the centre island/median at the mouth of the entrance has, for some time passed, also been demolished, leaving a cleaner, straighter run at the target.

Now, anyone with a bit of sense would have laughed, but the trouble was, the scene had the exact energy of a freak incident. The corner of the wall looked as if it had been clipped by something with intent. The slabs were splayed out like dominoes and there, faintly, on the remaining stone, was a dusty smear that could’ve been… anything. Cement, chalk, or, if you were inclined toward truth, pigeon ‘powder’.

The lad described it in detail, because once a man says “eighty,” he most certainly owes you a full reconstruction.

He’d been walking past with a breakfast roll, half thinking about nothing, when the air changed, that strange hush you get before something ridiculous happens. Then he heard it: a sound like a wet umbrella opening in a gale, followed by a “thwack” so crisp it could’ve been a cue in a slapstick film.

And out of the morning light came that pigeon; not flapping so much as committing to the air. Wings tucked. Head down. The posture of a creature that had made a decision and was seeing it through kamikaze style, consequences be damned. It skimmed the footpath at shin height, missing a drainpipe by inches, before striking the corner of the wall, with the confidence of something that had fully comprehensive insurance.

There was a split second of silence, then the wall gave a small, offended cough before the corner exploded. A puff of dust. A clatter of stone. Bits of dry mortar letting go. The slab on top shifted with a slow, dramatic slide, not fast, but certain, the way a decision, finally made, gathers momentum.

The pigeon, according to the lad, didn’t even look back. It hit, rebounded slightly, before landing on the path with a soft, insulting plop. It shook itself once, the way a dog shakes off rain, except this was more like a boxer loosening his shoulders after a solid clean punch, and then it waddled away. Yes, waddled. Not stumbled. Not fled. Not panicked. It waddled away with the leisurely swagger of a creature heading to a meeting that it was already late for, as if collapsing masonry was just part of its morning routine.

A split second of silence, then the wall gave a small, offended cough, before the corner exploded.

Our lad swore there was a moment of eye contact too, the pigeon looking at him with one eye, giving him that sideways judgement look, which sent a message; “You saw nothing”.

He tried, naturally, to tell people immediately. But you can’t just say “pigeon doing eighty” without consequences. The first person he told laughed so hard they nearly swallowed their Voopoo Vape. The second person said, “It was probably a van.” The third said, “That wall’s been in a bad way for years. Sure they forgot to add water to the cement”

And that was the thing, the wall had been in a bad way. Everyone knew it. Old stone, dry mortar, a corner that had taken a full two years of weather and knocks from the occasional careless wheelie bin. So the sceptics had an easy explanation.
But the lad had his own, far more convincing logic, “A van would’ve left tyre marks,” he said. “A car would’ve stopped.” “A pigeon? A pigeon has no paperwork. No road tax, no NCT or comprehensive insurance details. No apology. It just flew off… gone.”

Soon the story grew legs, as stories do. Someone said the pigeon had been training, drafting behind Local Link buses, doing sprints off rooftops, building speed like an athlete. Another said it wasn’t a pigeon at all, others felt that this “grey blur,” was possibly a pigeon that had eaten something experimental behind a local chipper. A woman up the road claimed she’d seen a flock in formation earlier that week, flying like they were under command.

One fella, too confident by half, suggested it was an “urban falcon strike” until he was reminded falcons don’t waddle. And then, right when everyone had almost settled back into boring explanations, a child walked past, looked at the rubble and said: “That’s where the pigeon landed, isn’t it.” Because there, on the cleanest slab, plain as a signature, was a small white mark, ‘pigeon powder’. Not conclusive, not scientific, but deeply, spiritually… pigeonish.

By lunchtime today, the pigeon had become a local legend. People started blaming it for other things. A dent in their gate? (The pigeon). A missing wheelie bin? (The pigeon). A traffic cone mysteriously stuck up a tree? (The pigeon). A cracked phone screen? (Sure you know yourself).
But our lad, he stayed firm, unwavering. “Eighty,” he’d repeat, as if defending a sworn statement. “Low-flying. Like a feathery meteor. It hit it and walked away.” He paused, then added the final detail, the one that made you almost believe him: “And the worst part is,” he said, “it looked disappointed the wall didn’t put up more of a fight.”

Pigeon or no pigeon, after today’s minor earthquake, the remaining wall line now matches neatly with the partially demolished left-hand side of the entry, giving the whole approach a more uniform look.
In the spirit of getting it repaired properly, maybe it’s time to float a modest (and no doubt wildly popular) idea; another 5% on business rates ring-fenced specifically for repairs, which, no doubt would make this wall look like it was only built once, and had been actually done properly in the first instance.

Tipperary Beware – Fake “NCT Booking” Website Targeting Motorists Online.

Motorists are being urged to remain on high alert after reports of a fraudulent website impersonating the National Car Test (NCT) booking service, designed to mislead people into making payments without actually securing any test appointment.

This scam site has been reported as closely resembling the legitimate NCT booking pages and is understood to be appearing through search engine results, where drivers searching to book a test may be diverted to the counterfeit platform.

Recent reports indicate victims have been charged amounts ranging from approximately €60 up to €600 for what is presented as an “NCT booking” or “service fee”, but no valid booking is then made.

Only use the official NCT booking site.
The only official and legitimate website for booking or managing an NCT appointment is: ncts.ie

Motorists are advised to type the address directly into their browser rather than clicking on sponsored links or unfamiliar results.

How to protect yourself – Key advice for motorists
Book only via ncts.ie (avoid lookalike sites and “booking agents” charging extra fees).
Check the web address carefully before entering any personal or payment details.
Be cautious of sites that demand unexpected additional payments or apply pressure to pay quickly.
If in doubt, leave the page and go directly to ncts.ie in a fresh browser window.

If you think you have been scammed!
Anyone who believes they may have made a payment to a fraudulent site should act immediately:
Contact your bank or card provider without delay to report the transaction and seek advice on stopping or disputing payment.
Report the matter to your local Garda station, bringing any relevant evidence (screenshots, emails, transaction confirmations, and the web address used).