Archives

Shergar, IRA, Sinn Féin Connection – What Princess Zahra’s New Account Adds.

For more than four decades, the kidnapping of Shergar has stood as one of the darkest and strangest crimes in Irish racing history. The Derby-winning stallion, whose ten-length victory at Epsom in 1981 remains the widest winning margin in the race’s long history, was stolen from Ballymany Stud in County Kildare, on the night of February 8th, 1983.

Now Princess Zahra Aga Khan, daughter of the late Aga Khan, has spoken publicly about the trauma for the first time. Her account adds a chilling new detail; Shergar was not kept alive for a long ransom negotiation. She says he was killed within two days of being taken, and that his death was carried out “in an awful way.”

The ransom demand was £2 million, but it was never paid. Princess Zahra has explained that the decision was not as simple as one wealthy owner refusing to hand over money. Shergar had been syndicated, meaning the Aga Khan did not own him outright. The other shareholders had to be considered, and there was also a deeper moral question: if the money was going to the IRA, could it later be used against human beings?

Shergar.

That question helps explain why the ransom was withheld. It was not just about money, insurance, or ownership structure. It was about refusing to fund violence.
Shergar had not been insured against kidnapping. As Princess Zahra put it, who would ever have imagined that someone would kidnap a horse? Yet that is exactly what happened. Armed men broke into the stud, took the horse, and briefly abducted groom Mr Jim Fitzgerald, before releasing him. Shergar’s body to date has never been found.

The IRA has long been suspected of carrying out the kidnapping. The commonly accepted version is that the operation was amateurish and badly planned. The kidnappers were prepared for a ransom demand, but not for the reality of handling a valuable, nervous, full-grown thoroughbred stallion. Shergar was a national symbol of Irish breeding and racing, but to the gang that took him, he seems to have been a fundraising target they did not know how to control.

This is where Mr Sean O’Callaghan (Irish Republican Army’s Southern Commander) enters the story. Mr O’Callaghan was a former Provisional IRA member who later became an informer for the Gardaí. In later accounts, he claimed the Shergar plot was an IRA fundraising operation that went wrong almost immediately. His version was that the kidnappers could not manage the horse, that Shergar panicked, and that he was killed shortly after being taken. Princess Zahra’s new account appears to strengthen the general outline that Shergar died early in the abduction rather than after a prolonged captivity.

In 2008, The Sunday Telegraph reported claims from another IRA member that Shergar was killed after a planned vet failed to appear and the ransom was not paid. With Gardaí searches making release difficult, allegedly decided it was too risky to let the horse go and ordered him shot four days after the kidnapping. The source said two men entered the stable, one with a machine gun, and Shergar died a violent, bloody death.

“There was blood everywhere and the horse even slipped on his own blood. There was lots of cussin’ and swearin’ because the horse wouldn’t die. It was a very bloody death.”

But Mr O’Callaghan’s role also raises an important political point: what, if anything, is the Sinn Féin connection?
The true Sinn Féin connection is not that Sinn Féin has been proved to have ordered or carried out the Shergar kidnapping. No such proof has been established, and no one was ever convicted over Shergar’s disappearance.
The documented Sinn Féin connection is Mr Sean O’Callaghan himself. He was not only a former IRA figure and later informer; he was also elected in 1985 as a Sinn Féin councillor in Tralee, County Kerry. That means one of the best-known sources for the IRA account of Shergar’s death, had a real political connection to Sinn Féin.

That distinction matters.
Sinn Féin was widely regarded during the Troubles as the political wing of the republican movement, while the Provisional IRA was the armed organisation. The two were closely associated in public perception and republican politics, but they were not the same legal entity. So the accurate statement is this: the Shergar kidnapping has long been attributed to the Provisional IRA, and one of the key later sources on the alleged IRA role, Mr Sean O’Callaghan, was also a Sinn Féin councillor. That is the real Sinn Féin link personal, political, and historical, not a proven party role in the crime itself.

Princess Zahra’s comments bring the story back from conspiracy and folklore to its human and moral core. Shergar was not an abstract symbol, a ransom asset, or a political bargaining chip. He was a remarkable animal, described by those who knew him as kind and gentle, and he was killed because criminals tried to turn him into money.

The tragedy is sharpened by what he represented. Shergar was one of the greatest racehorses of his generation, a symbol of Irish racing excellence, and a source of national pride. His kidnapping was not only a blow to the Aga Khan’s family and racing operation; it was an act that shocked Ireland and Britain because it violated something people regarded as beyond politics.

More than forty years later, the essential facts remain grim. Shergar was kidnapped. A ransom was demanded. The money was not paid, partly because it could have funded violence. The IRA has long been suspected. Mr Sean O’Callaghan, a former IRA man, Garda informer, and later Sinn Féin councillor, gave one of the most influential accounts of what happened. Princess Zahra has now added that Shergar was killed within two days, and in a terrible way.

Shergar’s remains have never been recovered. His killers were never brought before a court. But the latest account from Princess Zahra makes one thing clearer than ever; the kidnapping was not a clever political operation. It was a cruel, bungled crime that destroyed one of racing’s greatest horses.

Hamas’s Other Victims: Palestinians in Gaza.

If Irish political leaders from Sinn Féin and the Social Democrats want to speak about justice, human rights and moral responsibility, then they should be willing to condemn all terror, including Hamas’s terror against Palestinians, with the same force.

For years, too many people including members of Sinn Féin have labelled the present Hamas as “freedom fighters,” as if brutality becomes noble when it is wrapped in political language. But a new United Nations report makes the reality impossible to ignore: Hamas does not only terrorise Israelis. It terrorises Palestinians too.

The UN Independent International Commission of Inquiry has now documented a pattern of executions, torture, maiming and public punishment inside Gaza. This is not Israeli propaganda. This is not rumour. This is the United Nations describing Palestinians as “victims of all sides,” trapped between mass atrocities, repression and armed groups willing to rule through fear.

According to the report, the Commission identified 249 cases of executions and severe physical violence in Gaza during 2024–2025, resulting in at least 108 deaths and 384 injuries. The report says Hamas-affiliated forces were involved in at least 60 incidents, including public executions and brutal punishments carried out in front of communities.

The details are horrific. Men were reportedly blindfolded and shot in public squares. Others were beaten with metal pipes. Bones were deliberately broken. Victims were kneecapped, maimed, humiliated and punished in ways designed not only to injure the individual, but to send a message to everyone watching: obey, or this could be you.

The UN report describes these acts as amounting to the “war crimes of murder and torture.” That sentence should stop everyone in their tracks.
Public executions are not justice. Beatings with metal pipes are not resistance. Breaking the bones of Palestinians in the streets of Gaza is not liberation. It is terror.
And it matters that these crimes were carried out publicly. The Commission itself expressed alarm at the “severity and public nature” of the violence. Public punishment is a political tool. It is designed to spread fear, silence dissent, intimidate rivals, and remind ordinary civilians that the armed men are in control.

This is the truth many Irish people have refused to face: Hamas’s cruelty is not reserved for Israelis. It extends to Palestinians living under its rule. Palestinians in Gaza have been used as human shields, denied political freedom, exposed to ruinous wars, and now, according to the UN’s own findings, subjected to executions and torture by Hamas-affiliated forces.
None of this reduces the suffering of civilians in Gaza. It explains part of it. Palestinians are not served by pretending Hamas is a heroic movement. They are betrayed by that lie.

The UN has now put more evidence on the record. The question is whether those who excused Hamas for years will finally listen.
There is no freedom in being dragged into a square and shot. There is no dignity in being beaten with pipes. There is no liberation in broken bones.
Hamas is not a movement of freedom. It is a movement of fear.

A genuine concern for Palestinian lives must include concern for Palestinians abused by Hamas. A genuine defence of human rights must condemn torture whether the victim is Israeli or Palestinian. A genuine commitment to justice must reject the fantasy that armed extremists become moral actors simply because they claim to speak for an oppressed people.
Hamas has shown the world what it is through its actions: massacre, hostage-taking, repression, torture and public executions. It has brought misery to both Israelis and Palestinians alike.

That is why the latest Dáil debate on Ireland’s fixtures against Israel should trouble anyone who cares about moral consistency. Sinn Féin and the Social Democrats pushed motions aimed at stopping the Ireland-Israel matches and seeking Israel’s exclusion from international sport, but the Dáil rejected those proposals after Government amendments stated that the fixture is a matter for the Football Association of Ireland, not Government. The amended motions passed by 81 votes to 68.

The FAI is now considering whether the October 4th fixture should go ahead in Dublin or be moved to a neutral venue, with Hungary reported as a possible alternative, subject to UEFA approval.
But the wider question remains: why is there such political energy devoted to isolating Israel from sport, while far less attention is paid to the UN’s own findings that Hamas-affiliated forces have executed, tortured and maimed Palestinians in Gaza?

If Irish political leaders want to speak about justice, human rights and moral responsibility, then they should be willing to condemn all terror, including Hamas’s terror against Palestinians, with the same force.

The Dáil vote at least recognised that sporting fixtures are not for Government to dictate, but the debate also exposed how often the crimes of Hamas are treated as secondary, even when the victims are Palestinians themselves.

EU Migration Pact: Ireland Needs Compassion, But Also Control And Public Safety.

The EU Migration and Asylum Pact must be judged by one simple test: does it help Ireland and Europe manage migration in a way that is fair, humane, lawful and safe?

Compassion matters. People fleeing war, persecution and real danger should be treated with dignity. Ireland has a proud tradition of helping people in need, and that should not be abandoned.
But compassion cannot mean naivety. It cannot mean weak borders, poor screening, endless delays, or communities being told to accept decisions without proper consultation. It also cannot mean ignoring the genuine fear many Irish people now feel when they see violent attacks, pressure on housing, pressure on services, and a growing sense that ordinary people are not being listened to.

Across Ireland and Northern Ireland, people have been shaken by serious crimes and brutal attacks; the murder of teacher Ashling Murphy, the horrific attack on a priest in Downpatrick, and the shocking attempted beheading attack in Belfast. These cases are not all the same, and it would be wrong to use every tragedy to blame migrants as a whole. Most migrants are not criminals, and many come here to work, contribute and live peacefully.
But it would also be wrong for politicians to dismiss public concern as racism or extremism every time people ask serious questions about security, vetting, deportation, border control and community safety.

A fair migration system must protect refugees, but it must also protect the host community. That means proper identity checks, faster decisions, stronger removal of people who have no right to stay, and immediate action where anyone; be they Irish or non-Irish, poses a danger to the public.

The EU Migration Pact certainly may bring more structure to the asylum system, but structure alone is not enough. Faster procedures must still be fair. Human rights must be respected. But public safety must also be treated as a human right, because Irish people have the right to feel safe in their towns, churches, schools, streets and homes.
The debate should not be reduced to two extremes. On one side, there are people who want to shut the door completely. On the other, there are people who seem unwilling to admit that uncontrolled migration creates real problems. Ireland needs neither open-door idealism nor hatred. Ireland needs balance.

That balance should be clear:
We should welcome genuine refugees.
We should reject racism and violence against innocent people.
We should remove those who abuse the system.
We should never ignore crimes that terrify communities.
We should demand honesty from government instead of slogans.

The EU Migration Pact will only work if it restores trust. Trust requires fairness for asylum seekers, but also fairness for Irish citizens. Trust requires compassion, but also enforcement. Trust requires humanity, but also common sense.
Migration must be managed properly. Borders must mean something. Communities must be consulted. Dangerous people must not be allowed to fall through the cracks.

Ireland can be generous, but generosity must be matched with responsibility. A humane country protects the vulnerable, and that includes both those seeking refuge and the Irish people who expect their government to keep them safe.

Irish Government Moves Forward With Jennie’s Law.

Irish Government Moves Forward with Jennie’s Law to Strengthen Protection Against Domestic Violence

Government approval has been granted for the publication of new legislation designed to improve public access to information about serious domestic violence convictions.

The Domestic Violence (Judgments) Register Bill 2026, known as Jennie’s Law, will establish a public Register of Judgements for certain serious domestic violence offences committed against a partner or former partner.
The proposed register is intended to help people who are in, or are considering entering, a relationship to find out whether a person has a history of serious domestic violence convictions. It is named in memory of Jennifer Poole, who was murdered by her former partner in 2021.

Under the legislation, relevant convictions may be published as part of the court process. The register will be made available through the Courts Service website and will include judgements relating to serious domestic violence offences where publication is considered appropriate.
Publication will not be automatic in every case. The trial judge will have discretion to decide whether a judgement should be published. Victim consent will also be required before a convicted person can be named on the register.

The published judgement may include details of the conviction, the sentence imposed, and any other information the judge considers relevant to the offence. These judgements will appear online under a dedicated heading titled “Domestic Violence Register Judgements”.

The measure is designed to complement existing public access to criminal court outcomes, including media reporting of court proceedings. It is not intended to operate as an additional punishment, but as a means of improving transparency and supporting public safety.
The Bill will insert a new Part 3A into the Domestic Violence Act 2018 and will apply to convictions on indictment for serious domestic violence offences.
The register will also be presented in a way that links users to appropriate domestic violence supports and services. This will help ensure that anyone accessing the information, whether for themselves or out of concern for someone else, can be directed towards practical help.
A person named on the register will be able to apply to the court for removal no earlier than three years after conviction. Any decision to remove a judgement from the register will remain a matter for the court.

Jennie’s Law forms part of a wider approach to preventing domestic violence, protecting victims, and reducing the risk of reoffending. This includes ongoing protective measures led by An Garda Síochána, including initiatives aimed at supporting people who may be at risk from individuals with a history of serious domestic violence.

The Bill is expected to be published shortly and introduced in the Houses of the Oireachtas soon afterwards.

Government Publishes Report On Allegations of Child Sexual Abuse.

Irish Government Publishes Final Report Of Commission of Investigation in Response to Complaints of Allegations of Child Sexual Abuse made against Mr Bill Kenneally and Related Matters.

The Government has published the final report of the Commission of Investigation into the handling of complaints and allegations of child sexual abuse made against Mr Bill Kenneally.

The report concerns matters of profound public concern, including the response of An Garda Síochána, the HSE’s predecessor bodies, Basketball Ireland and others to allegations made over many years.
In publishing the report, the government has acknowledged the bravery, perseverance and strength of Kenneally’s victims in seeking truth and accountability, and recognised the serious impact of his crimes and the institutional failures surrounding them.

The Commission, led by a retired Judge of the High Court, Mr Michael White, having finalised its work and submitted its final report to the government, is now dissolved in accordance with section 43 of the Commissions of Investigation Act 2004 further to its submission of this Final Report.

The Final Report of the Commission on Investigation can be found HERE.

The terms of reference are available HERE.